Robinson Robert, Bhattarai Mukul, Hudali Tamer
Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois, University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois.
Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois, University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois
Clin Med Res. 2019 Dec;17(3-4):63-71. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2019.1461. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
Hospital readmissions are common and expensive. Risk factors for hospital readmission may include vital sign abnormalities (VSA) at the time of discharge. The study aimed to validate VSA at the time of discharge as a useful predictor of hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge. VSA was compared to the validated HOSPITAL score and LACE index readmission risk prediction models.
All adult medical patients discharged from internal medicine hospitalist service were studied retrospectively. Variables such as age, gender, diagnoses, vital signs at discharge, 30-day hospital readmission, and components for the HOSPITAL score and LACE index were extracted from the electronic health record for analysis.
A 507-bed university-affiliated tertiary care center.
During the 2-year study period, a cohort of 1,916 discharges for the hospitalist service were evaluated. The final analysis was based on the data from 1,781 hospital discharges that met the inclusion criteria.
VSA was found in 13% of the study population. Only one abnormal vital sign was present in a higher proportion readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. No discharges had three or more unstable vital signs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) comparisons of the HOSPITAL score (C statistic of 0.67, P < 0.001), LACE index (C statistic of 0.61, P < 0.001), and VSA (C statistic of 0.52, P = 0.318) indicated that VSA at time of discharge was not a useful predictor of hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge.
Our study indicated that VSA at the time of discharge is not a useful predictor of 30-day hospital readmission at a university-affiliated teaching hospital. The more complex and validated HOSPITAL score and LACE index were useful predictors of hospital readmission in this patient population.
医院再入院情况常见且费用高昂。出院时生命体征异常(VSA)可能是医院再入院的风险因素。本研究旨在验证出院时的VSA作为出院后30天内医院再入院的有效预测指标。将VSA与经过验证的医院评分(HOSPITAL score)和LACE指数再入院风险预测模型进行比较。
对内科住院医师服务出院的所有成年内科患者进行回顾性研究。从电子健康记录中提取年龄、性别、诊断、出院时生命体征、30天内医院再入院情况以及医院评分和LACE指数的组成部分等变量进行分析。
一家拥有507张床位的大学附属三级医疗中心。
在为期2年的研究期间,对住院医师服务的1916例出院病例进行了评估。最终分析基于符合纳入标准的1781例出院病例的数据。
研究人群中13%存在VSA。在出院后30天内再次入院的患者中,仅有一种异常生命体征的比例更高。没有出院病例有三种或更多不稳定的生命体征。医院评分(C统计量为0.67,P < 0.001)、LACE指数(C统计量为0.61,P < 0.001)和VSA(C统计量为0.52,P = 0.318)的受试者工作特征(ROC)比较表明,出院时的VSA不是出院后30天内医院再入院的有效预测指标。
我们的研究表明,在大学附属教学医院,出院时的VSA不是30天内医院再入院的有效预测指标。更复杂且经过验证的医院评分和LACE指数是该患者群体医院再入院的有效预测指标。