• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Vital Sign Abnormalities on Discharge Do Not Predict 30-Day Readmission.出院时生命体征异常不能预测30天再入院情况。
Clin Med Res. 2019 Dec;17(3-4):63-71. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2019.1461. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
2
HOSPITAL Score, LACE Index and LACE+ Index as predictors of 30-day readmission in patients with heart failure.医院评分、LACE 指数和 LACE+指数对心力衰竭患者 30 天再入院的预测价值。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Oct;25(5):166-167. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111271. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
3
The HOSPITAL score and LACE index as predictors of 30 day readmission in a retrospective study at a university-affiliated community hospital.在一所大学附属医院进行的回顾性研究中,医院评分(HOSPITAL score)和LACE指数作为30天再入院的预测指标。
PeerJ. 2017 Mar 29;5:e3137. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3137. eCollection 2017.
4
Evaluating the predictive strength of the LACE index in identifying patients at high risk of hospital readmission following an inpatient episode: a retrospective cohort study.评估LACE指数在识别住院患者出院后再次入院高风险患者方面的预测强度:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):e016921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016921.
5
The HOSPITAL score as a predictor of 30 day readmission in a retrospective study at a university affiliated community hospital.在一所大学附属医院的回顾性研究中,HOSPITAL评分作为30天再入院的预测指标。
PeerJ. 2016 Sep 8;4:e2441. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2441. eCollection 2016.
6
LACE+ Index as Predictor of 30-Day Readmission in Brain Tumor Population.LACE+指数作为脑肿瘤患者30天再入院的预测指标
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e443-e448. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.169. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
7
LACE Index to Predict the High Risk of 30-Day Readmission in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction at a University Affiliated Hospital.预测某大学附属医院急性心肌梗死患者30天再入院高风险的LACE指数
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 11;9:925965. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.925965. eCollection 2022.
8
LACE+ index: extension of a validated index to predict early death or urgent readmission after hospital discharge using administrative data.LACE+指数:一种经过验证的指数的扩展,用于利用行政数据预测出院后早期死亡或紧急再入院情况。
Open Med. 2012 Jul 19;6(3):e80-90. Print 2012.
9
Evaluation of prediction strategy and care coordination for COPD readmissions.慢性阻塞性肺疾病再入院的预测策略与护理协调评估
Hosp Pract (1995). 2016 Aug;44(3):123-8. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2016.1210472. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
10
Using the LACE index to predict hospital readmissions in congestive heart failure patients.使用LACE指数预测充血性心力衰竭患者的医院再入院情况。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014 Aug 7;14:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-97.

引用本文的文献

1
Deviating vital signs in continuous monitoring prior to discharge and risk of readmission: an observational study.出院前连续监测中生命体征的变化与再入院风险:一项观察性研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;18(5):1453-1461. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03318-4. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
2
Heart Failure Drug Class Effects on 30-Day Readmission Rates in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Retrospective Single Center Study.射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者中,心力衰竭药物类别对30天再入院率的影响:一项回顾性单中心研究
Medicines (Basel). 2020 May 20;7(5):30. doi: 10.3390/medicines7050030.
3
Predictors of 30-day hospital readmission: The direct comparison of number of discharge medications to the HOSPITAL score and LACE index.30天再入院的预测因素:出院用药数量与医院评分及LACE指数的直接比较。
Future Healthc J. 2019 Oct;6(3):209-214. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2018-0039.

本文引用的文献

1
Age trends in 30 day hospital readmissions: US national retrospective analysis.30天内医院再入院情况的年龄趋势:美国全国性回顾性分析。
BMJ. 2018 Feb 27;360:k497. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k497.
2
Development and prospective validation of a model estimating risk of readmission in cancer patients.癌症患者再入院风险评估模型的开发与前瞻性验证
J Surg Oncol. 2018 May;117(6):1113-1118. doi: 10.1002/jso.24968. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
3
A qualitative investigation of healthcare workers' strategies in response to readmissions.对医护人员应对再入院策略的定性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 27;18(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2945-9.
4
Short-term rehospitalization across the spectrum of age and insurance types in the United States.美国不同年龄和保险类型人群的短期再住院情况。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 10;12(7):e0180767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180767. eCollection 2017.
5
The HOSPITAL score and LACE index as predictors of 30 day readmission in a retrospective study at a university-affiliated community hospital.在一所大学附属医院进行的回顾性研究中,医院评分(HOSPITAL score)和LACE指数作为30天再入院的预测指标。
PeerJ. 2017 Mar 29;5:e3137. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3137. eCollection 2017.
6
Comparing performance of 30-day readmission risk classifiers among hospitalized primary care patients.比较住院初级保健患者中30天再入院风险分类器的性能。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;23(3):524-529. doi: 10.1111/jep.12656. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
7
The HOSPITAL score as a predictor of 30 day readmission in a retrospective study at a university affiliated community hospital.在一所大学附属医院的回顾性研究中,HOSPITAL评分作为30天再入院的预测指标。
PeerJ. 2016 Sep 8;4:e2441. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2441. eCollection 2016.
8
Vital Signs Are Still Vital: Instability on Discharge and the Risk of Post-Discharge Adverse Outcomes.生命体征仍然至关重要:出院时的不稳定与出院后不良结局的风险
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jan;32(1):42-48. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3826-8. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
9
Prospective validation and adaptation of the HOSPITAL score to predict high risk of unplanned readmission of medical patients.前瞻性验证和调整医院评分以预测内科患者计划外再入院的高风险。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2016 Aug 6;146:w14335. doi: 10.4414/smw.2016.14335. eCollection 2016.
10
Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review.预测28天或30天非计划住院再入院的模型效用:一项更新的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 27;6(6):e011060. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011060.

出院时生命体征异常不能预测30天再入院情况。

Vital Sign Abnormalities on Discharge Do Not Predict 30-Day Readmission.

作者信息

Robinson Robert, Bhattarai Mukul, Hudali Tamer

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois, University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois.

Department of Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois, University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois

出版信息

Clin Med Res. 2019 Dec;17(3-4):63-71. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2019.1461. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

DOI:10.3121/cmr.2019.1461
PMID:31324735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6886897/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hospital readmissions are common and expensive. Risk factors for hospital readmission may include vital sign abnormalities (VSA) at the time of discharge. The study aimed to validate VSA at the time of discharge as a useful predictor of hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge. VSA was compared to the validated HOSPITAL score and LACE index readmission risk prediction models.

DESIGN

All adult medical patients discharged from internal medicine hospitalist service were studied retrospectively. Variables such as age, gender, diagnoses, vital signs at discharge, 30-day hospital readmission, and components for the HOSPITAL score and LACE index were extracted from the electronic health record for analysis.

SETTINGS

A 507-bed university-affiliated tertiary care center.

PARTICIPANTS

During the 2-year study period, a cohort of 1,916 discharges for the hospitalist service were evaluated. The final analysis was based on the data from 1,781 hospital discharges that met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

VSA was found in 13% of the study population. Only one abnormal vital sign was present in a higher proportion readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. No discharges had three or more unstable vital signs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) comparisons of the HOSPITAL score (C statistic of 0.67, P < 0.001), LACE index (C statistic of 0.61, P < 0.001), and VSA (C statistic of 0.52, P = 0.318) indicated that VSA at time of discharge was not a useful predictor of hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated that VSA at the time of discharge is not a useful predictor of 30-day hospital readmission at a university-affiliated teaching hospital. The more complex and validated HOSPITAL score and LACE index were useful predictors of hospital readmission in this patient population.

摘要

目的

医院再入院情况常见且费用高昂。出院时生命体征异常(VSA)可能是医院再入院的风险因素。本研究旨在验证出院时的VSA作为出院后30天内医院再入院的有效预测指标。将VSA与经过验证的医院评分(HOSPITAL score)和LACE指数再入院风险预测模型进行比较。

设计

对内科住院医师服务出院的所有成年内科患者进行回顾性研究。从电子健康记录中提取年龄、性别、诊断、出院时生命体征、30天内医院再入院情况以及医院评分和LACE指数的组成部分等变量进行分析。

地点

一家拥有507张床位的大学附属三级医疗中心。

参与者

在为期2年的研究期间,对住院医师服务的1916例出院病例进行了评估。最终分析基于符合纳入标准的1781例出院病例的数据。

结果

研究人群中13%存在VSA。在出院后30天内再次入院的患者中,仅有一种异常生命体征的比例更高。没有出院病例有三种或更多不稳定的生命体征。医院评分(C统计量为0.67,P < 0.001)、LACE指数(C统计量为0.61,P < 0.001)和VSA(C统计量为0.52,P = 0.318)的受试者工作特征(ROC)比较表明,出院时的VSA不是出院后30天内医院再入院的有效预测指标。

结论

我们的研究表明,在大学附属教学医院,出院时的VSA不是30天内医院再入院的有效预测指标。更复杂且经过验证的医院评分和LACE指数是该患者群体医院再入院的有效预测指标。