• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

QUIPP App v.2 预测模型的建立和验证:用于预测无症状高危孕妇早产的工具。

Development and validation of predictive models for QUiPP App v.2: tool for predicting preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women.

机构信息

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;55(3):348-356. doi: 10.1002/uog.20401.

DOI:10.1002/uog.20401
PMID:31325332
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Accurate mid-pregnancy prediction of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) is essential to ensure appropriate surveillance of high-risk women. Advancing the QUiPP App prototype, QUiPP App v.2 aimed to provide individualized risk of delivery based on cervical length (CL), quantitative fetal fibronectin (qfFN) or both tests combined, taking into account further risk factors, such as multiple pregnancy. Here we report development of the QUiPP App v.2 predictive models for use in asymptomatic high-risk women, and validation using a distinct dataset in order to confirm the accuracy and transportability of the QUiPP App, overall and within specific clinically relevant time frames.

METHODS

This was a prospective secondary analysis of data of asymptomatic women at high risk of sPTB recruited in 13 UK preterm birth clinics. Women were offered longitudinal qfFN testing every 2-4 weeks and/or transvaginal ultrasound CL measurement between 18 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. A total of 1803 women (3878 visits) were included in the training set and 904 women (1400 visits) in the validation set. Prediction models were created based on the training set for use in three groups: patients with risk factors for sPTB and CL measurement alone, with risk factors for sPTB and qfFN measurement alone, and those with risk factors for sPTB and both CL and qfFN measurements. Survival analysis was used to identify the significant predictors of sPTB, and parametric structures for survival models were compared and the best selected. The estimated overall probability of delivery before six clinically important time points (< 30, < 34 and < 37 weeks' gestation and within 1, 2 and 4 weeks after testing) was calculated for each woman and analyzed as a predictive test for the actual occurrence of each event. This allowed receiver-operating-characteristics curves to be plotted, and areas under the curve (AUC) to be calculated. Calibration was performed to measure the agreement between expected and observed outcomes.

RESULTS

All three algorithms demonstrated high accuracy for the prediction of sPTB at < 30, < 34 and < 37 weeks' gestation and within 1, 2 and 4 weeks of testing, with AUCs between 0.75 and 0.90 for the use of qfFN and CL combined, between 0.68 and 0.90 for qfFN alone, and between 0.71 and 0.87 for CL alone. The differences between the three algorithms were not statistically significant. Calibration confirmed no significant differences between expected and observed rates of sPTB within 4 weeks and a slight overestimation of risk with the use of CL measurement between 22 + 0 and 25 + 6 weeks' gestation.

CONCLUSIONS

The QUiPP App v.2 is a highly accurate prediction tool for sPTB that is based on a unique combination of biomarkers, symptoms and statistical algorithms. It can be used reliably in the context of communicating to patients the risk of sPTB. Whilst further work is required to determine its role in identifying women requiring prophylactic interventions, it is a reliable and convenient screening tool for planning follow-up or hospitalization for high-risk women. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

摘要

目的

准确预测中期妊娠自发性早产(sPTB)对于确保高危女性的适当监测至关重要。推进 QUiPP App 原型,QUiPP App v.2 的目的是提供基于宫颈长度(CL)、定量胎儿纤维连接蛋白(qfFN)或两者联合检测的个体化分娩风险,同时考虑其他风险因素,如多胎妊娠。本研究旨在报告无症状高危女性使用 QUiPP App v.2 预测模型的开发情况,并使用独立数据集进行验证,以确认 QUiPP App 的准确性和可转移性,总体和特定临床相关时间框架内的准确性和可转移性。

方法

这是一项针对在英国 13 家早产诊所招募的高危无症状 sPTB 女性的前瞻性二次分析。为高危无症状女性提供 qfFN 每 2-4 周或阴道超声 CL 测量,从 18+0 周到 36+6 周。共有 1803 名女性(3878 次就诊)被纳入训练集,904 名女性(1400 次就诊)被纳入验证集。基于训练集为 sPTB 风险因素和单独进行 CL 测量、sPTB 风险因素和单独进行 qfFN 测量以及 sPTB 风险因素和 CL 和 qfFN 测量的女性建立预测模型。生存分析用于识别 sPTB 的显著预测因子,并比较和选择参数结构生存模型。为每位女性计算了六个重要临床时间点(<30、<34 和<37 周妊娠以及检测后 1、2 和 4 周)之前发生 sPTB 的总概率,并将其分析为实际发生的预测性测试每个事件。这允许绘制接收者操作特征曲线,并计算曲线下面积(AUC)。进行校准以测量预期结果和观察结果之间的一致性。

结果

所有三种算法在预测<30、<34 和<37 周妊娠以及检测后 1、2 和 4 周内的 sPTB 方面均表现出较高的准确性,qfFN 和 CL 联合使用的 AUC 在 0.75 至 0.90 之间,qfFN 单独使用的 AUC 在 0.68 至 0.90 之间,CL 单独使用的 AUC 在 0.71 至 0.87 之间。三种算法之间的差异无统计学意义。校准证实,在 4 周内,sPTB 的预期和观察发生率之间没有显著差异,在 22+0 至 25+6 周妊娠期间使用 CL 测量时存在轻微的风险高估。

结论

QUiPP App v.2 是一种基于独特的生物标志物、症状和统计算法组合的 sPTB 高度准确的预测工具。它可以在向患者传达 sPTB 风险的背景下可靠地使用。虽然需要进一步研究来确定其在识别需要预防性干预的女性中的作用,但它是一种可靠且方便的筛查工具,可用于计划高危女性的随访或住院治疗。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of predictive models for QUiPP App v.2: tool for predicting preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women.QUIPP App v.2 预测模型的建立和验证:用于预测无症状高危孕妇早产的工具。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;55(3):348-356. doi: 10.1002/uog.20401.
2
Development and validation of predictive models for QUiPP App v.2: tool for predicting preterm birth in women with symptoms of threatened preterm labor.QUIPP App v.2 预测模型的开发与验证:一种预测有早产先兆症状的孕妇早产的工具。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;55(3):357-367. doi: 10.1002/uog.20422.
3
Development and validation of a tool incorporating cervical length and quantitative fetal fibronectin to predict spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women.一种结合宫颈长度和定量胎儿纤维连接蛋白来预测无症状高危女性自发性早产的工具的开发与验证。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;47(1):104-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.14865.
4
Effect of QUiPP prediction algorithm on treatment decisions in women with a previous preterm birth: a prospective cohort study.QUIPP 预测算法对有既往早产史的女性治疗决策的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BJOG. 2019 Dec;126(13):1569-1575. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15886. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
5
The use of fetal fibronectin and cervical length measurements in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in women with an Arabin pessary in situ.阿拉伯宫颈扩张球囊在位孕妇中使用胎儿纤维连接蛋白和宫颈长度测量预测自发性早产。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Sep;276:113-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.06.025. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
6
Development and validation of a tool incorporating quantitative fetal fibronectin to predict spontaneous preterm birth in symptomatic women.一种结合定量胎儿纤连蛋白的工具的开发与验证,用于预测有症状女性的自发性早产。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;47(2):210-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.14894.
7
Performance of QUiPP App v.2 tool for prediction of preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women attending preterm specialist clinic: external validation study.QUIPP App v.2 工具预测无症状高危孕妇早产的表现:在早产专科诊所就诊的外部验证研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul;64(1):71-78. doi: 10.1002/uog.27619. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
8
Evaluation of additive effect of quantitative fetal fibronectin to cervical length for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth among asymptomatic high-risk women.评估定量胎儿纤维连接蛋白对宫颈长度的附加效应,以预测无症状高危人群自发性早产。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Aug;33(15):2628-2634. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1555816. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
9
The QUiPP App: a safe alternative to a treat-all strategy for threatened preterm labor.QUIPP 应用程序:一种有威胁性早产的安全替代治疗方法。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;50(3):342-346. doi: 10.1002/uog.17499. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
10
Mid-trimester sonographic cervical consistency index to predict spontaneous preterm birth in a low-risk population.中孕期超声宫颈一致性指数预测低危人群自发性早产。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;51(5):629-636. doi: 10.1002/uog.17482. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Task shifting: a key aspect to improving care for women at risk of preterm birth.任务转移:改善早产风险妇女护理的关键方面。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Aug 22;14(3):e003104. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003104.
2
Deep Learning in Predicting Preterm Birth: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms.深度学习在预测早产中的应用:机器学习算法的比较研究
Matern Fetal Med. 2024 Jul 18;6(3):141-146. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000236. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Evaluation of a two-tier preterm birth prevention service in a tertiary hospital in the United Kingdom: a retrospective cohort study.
英国一家三级医院的两层级早产预防服务评估:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07538-8.
4
Developing a logistic regression model to predict spontaneous preterm birth from maternal socio-demographic and obstetric history at initial pregnancy registration.建立逻辑回归模型,以预测初始妊娠登记时的产妇社会人口学和产科史自发性早产。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):688. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06892-3.
5
Prediction model for spontaneous preterm birth less than 32 weeks of gestation in low-risk women with mid-trimester short cervical length: a retrospective cohort study.孕中期宫颈长度短的低风险女性妊娠小于32周自发性早产的预测模型:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06822-3.
6
Socioeconomic and ethnic disparities in preterm births in an English maternity setting: a population-based study of 1.3 million births.在英国的产科环境中,社会经济和种族差异与早产有关:一项基于人群的 130 万例分娩研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Sep 20;22(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03493-x.
7
Assessment of current biomarkers and interventions to identify and treat women at risk of preterm birth.评估当前用于识别和治疗有早产风险女性的生物标志物及干预措施。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 26;11:1414428. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1414428. eCollection 2024.
8
Preterm Birth: Screening and Prediction.早产:筛查与预测
Int J Womens Health. 2023 Dec 21;15:1981-1997. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S436624. eCollection 2023.
9
Functional assessment of brain development in fetuses that subsequently deliver very preterm: An MRI pilot study.胎儿期大脑发育的功能评估:随后早产的 MRI 初步研究。
Prenat Diagn. 2024 Jan;44(1):49-56. doi: 10.1002/pd.6498. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
10
Assessment of cervical softening and the prediction of preterm birth (STIPP): protocol for a prospective cohort study.评估宫颈软化程度和预测早产(STIPP):一项前瞻性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 21;13(11):e071597. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071597.