Suppr超能文献

道路交通事故死亡中弱势道路使用者与机动车驾乘人员的流行病学和损伤特征比较。

Comparison of epidemiology and injury profile between vulnerable road users and motor vehicle occupants in road traffic fatalities.

机构信息

a Department of Emergency Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital , Seowon-gu , Cheongju-si , Chungcheongbuk-do , South Korea.

b Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital , Jongno-gu , Seoul , South Korea.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(6):581-587. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1539840. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

Abstract

Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are a major global health issue causing a global burden of mortality and morbidity. Half of all fatalities on the world's roads are vulnerable road users (VRUs). The targeted intervention strategies based on fatality analysis focusing on VRUs can effectively contribute to reducing RTIs. This study aimed to compare VRUs and motor vehicle occupants (MVOs) in terms of epidemiology and injury profile. We utilized a nationwide, prospective database of RTI-related mortality cases for patients who visited 23 emergency departments between January 2011 and December 2015. All fatalities due to RTIs in the prehospital phase or in-hospital were eligible, excluding patients with unknown mode of transport and those admitted to general wards. The primary and secondary outcomes were fracture injuries and visceral injuries diagnosed using the , Tenth Revision (ICD-10). We compared fracture injuries between VRUs and MVOs using Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2- and 2+ classification. Among a total 3,694 road traffic fatalities (RTFs), 43.3% were pedestrians, followed by MVOs (27.0%), motorcyclists (18.9), bicyclists (6.6%), and agricultural vehicle users (4.2%). The elderly (>60 years old) accounted for 54.9% of VRU fatalities. RTFs occurred most frequently in the autumn and the VRU group and the MVO group showed significant differences in weekly and diurnal variation in RTFs. The injury severities (AIS 2+) of the head, neck, and thorax were significantly different between the 2 groups ( < 0.05). Head (32.1%) and intracranial (58.6%) injuries were the most common fracture and visceral injury sites for RTFs, followed by the thorax and intrathoracic organs (25.3 and 28.8%, respectively). Elderly pedestrians should be targeted for decreases in RTFs, and road traffic safety interventions for VRUs should be made based on the analysis of temporal epidemiology and injury profiles of RTFs.

摘要

道路交通事故伤害(RTIs)是一个全球性的主要健康问题,导致全球死亡率和发病率负担沉重。世界道路上一半的死亡人数是弱势道路使用者(VRUs)。基于针对 VRUs 的死亡率分析的有针对性的干预策略可以有效减少 RTIs。本研究旨在比较 VRUs 和机动车乘员(MVOs)在流行病学和损伤特征方面的差异。

我们利用了一个全国性的、前瞻性的 RTI 相关死亡率病例数据库,该数据库涵盖了 2011 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间 23 个急诊部门就诊的患者。所有在院前阶段或院内因 RTIs 死亡的患者均符合条件,不包括运输方式未知的患者和入住普通病房的患者。主要和次要结局是使用第十次修订版(ICD-10)诊断的骨折损伤和内脏损伤。我们使用损伤严重程度评分(AIS)2- 和 2+分类比较了 VRUs 和 MVOs 之间的骨折损伤。

在总共 3694 例道路交通事故死亡(RTFs)中,行人占 43.3%,其次是 MVOs(27.0%)、摩托车手(18.9%)、自行车手(6.6%)和农业车辆使用者(4.2%)。老年人(>60 岁)占 VRU 死亡人数的 54.9%。RTFs 最常发生在秋季,VRU 组和 MVO 组在 RTFs 的周和日变化方面存在显著差异。两组之间头部、颈部和胸部的损伤严重程度(AIS 2+)有显著差异(<0.05)。头部(32.1%)和颅内(58.6%)损伤是 RTFs 最常见的骨折和内脏损伤部位,其次是胸部和胸内器官(分别为 25.3%和 28.8%)。

应针对老年人行人减少 RTFs,并且应根据 RTFs 的时间流行病学和损伤特征分析,为 VRUs 制定道路交通安全干预措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验