• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激前反馈连接会影响视觉体验的内容。

Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences.

机构信息

Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria;

Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 6;116(32):16056-16061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817317116. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1817317116
PMID:31332019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6689959/
Abstract

Ongoing fluctuations in neural excitability and in networkwide activity patterns before stimulus onset have been proposed to underlie variability in near-threshold stimulus detection paradigms-that is, whether or not an object is perceived. Here, we investigated the impact of prestimulus neural fluctuations on the content of perception-that is, whether one or another object is perceived. We recorded neural activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) before and while participants briefly viewed an ambiguous image, the Rubin face/vase illusion, and required them to report their perceived interpretation in each trial. Using multivariate pattern analysis, we showed robust decoding of the perceptual report during the poststimulus period. Applying source localization to the classifier weights suggested early recruitment of primary visual cortex (V1) and ∼160-ms recruitment of the category-sensitive fusiform face area (FFA). These poststimulus effects were accompanied by stronger oscillatory power in the gamma frequency band for face vs. vase reports. In prestimulus intervals, we found no differences in oscillatory power between face vs. vase reports in V1 or in FFA, indicating similar levels of neural excitability. Despite this, we found stronger connectivity between V1 and FFA before face reports for low-frequency oscillations. Specifically, the strength of prestimulus feedback connectivity (i.e., Granger causality) from FFA to V1 predicted not only the category of the upcoming percept but also the strength of poststimulus neural activity associated with the percept. Our work shows that prestimulus network states can help shape future processing in category-sensitive brain regions and in this way bias the content of visual experiences.

摘要

在刺激出现前,神经兴奋性和全网活动模式的持续波动被认为是在近阈刺激检测范式中产生变异性的基础,即是否能感知到某个物体。在这里,我们研究了刺激前神经波动对感知内容的影响,即感知到的是一个物体还是另一个物体。我们使用脑磁图(MEG)在参与者短暂观察一个模糊的图像,即鲁宾花瓶/人脸错觉时,记录他们的神经活动,并要求他们在每次试验中报告自己的感知解释。使用多变量模式分析,我们在刺激后期间显示了对感知报告的强大解码。将源定位应用于分类器权重表明,初级视觉皮层(V1)和大约 160 毫秒时的类别敏感梭状回面孔区(FFA)被早期招募。这些刺激后效应伴随着面孔报告的γ频带中更强的振荡功率,而花瓶报告则没有。在刺激前间隔中,我们在 V1 或 FFA 中没有发现面孔与花瓶报告之间的振荡功率差异,表明神经兴奋性相似。尽管如此,我们发现,在面孔报告之前,低频振荡的 V1 和 FFA 之间存在更强的反馈连接。具体来说,从 FFA 到 V1 的刺激前反馈连接(即格兰杰因果关系)的强度不仅预测了即将到来的感知的类别,而且还预测了与感知相关的刺激后神经活动的强度。我们的工作表明,刺激前的网络状态可以帮助塑造在类别敏感的大脑区域的未来处理,并以这种方式影响视觉体验的内容。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e9/6689959/dbdb3fc36967/pnas.1817317116fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e9/6689959/c5bac12211ae/pnas.1817317116fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e9/6689959/273f76736133/pnas.1817317116fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e9/6689959/16f808ab37b2/pnas.1817317116fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e9/6689959/dbdb3fc36967/pnas.1817317116fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e9/6689959/c5bac12211ae/pnas.1817317116fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e9/6689959/273f76736133/pnas.1817317116fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e9/6689959/16f808ab37b2/pnas.1817317116fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e9/6689959/dbdb3fc36967/pnas.1817317116fig04.jpg

相似文献

1
Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences.刺激前反馈连接会影响视觉体验的内容。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 6;116(32):16056-16061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817317116. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
2
Efficient Prestimulus Network Integration of Fusiform Face Area Biases Face Perception during Binocular Rivalry.梭状回面孔区的有效预刺激网络整合在双眼竞争期间偏向面孔感知。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 May 2;34(6):1001-1014. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01843.
3
Prestimulus Alpha Power Influences Tactile Temporal Perceptual Discrimination and Confidence in Decisions.刺激前α波功率影响触觉时间知觉辨别及决策信心。
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Mar;26(3):891-903. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu247. Epub 2014 Oct 19.
4
How ongoing fluctuations in human visual cortex predict perceptual awareness: baseline shift versus decision bias.人类视觉皮层的持续波动如何预测知觉意识:基线偏移与决策偏差。
J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 8;29(27):8715-25. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0962-09.2009.
5
U-shaped Relation between Prestimulus Alpha-band and Poststimulus Gamma-band Power in Temporal Tactile Perception in the Human Somatosensory Cortex.人类体感皮层中时间触觉感知的刺激前α波段和刺激后γ波段功率之间的 U 型关系。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Apr;30(4):552-564. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01219. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
6
Pre-stimulus alpha-band power and phase fluctuations originate from different neural sources and exert distinct impact on stimulus-evoked responses.刺激前的 alpha 波段功率和相位波动源自不同的神经源,对刺激诱发的反应产生不同的影响。
Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Jun;55(11-12):3178-3190. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15138. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
7
Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance.刺激前 EEG 功率可预测意识清醒度,但不能预测客观视觉绩效。
eNeuro. 2017 Dec 12;4(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0182-17.2017. eCollection 2017 Nov-Dec.
8
Prior Knowledge Uses Prestimulus Alpha Band Oscillations and Persistent Poststimulus Neural Templates for Conscious Perception.先前知识利用刺激前的阿尔法波段振荡和持续的刺激后神经模板进行意识感知。
J Neurosci. 2023 Aug 30;43(35):6164-6175. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0263-23.2023. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
9
Detecting Pre-Stimulus Source-Level Effects on Object Perception with Magnetoencephalography.利用脑磁图检测刺激前源水平对物体感知的影响。
J Vis Exp. 2019 Jul 26(149). doi: 10.3791/60120.
10
The Triple-Flash Illusion Reveals a Driving Role of Alpha-Band Reverberations in Visual Perception.三闪光错觉揭示了α波段回响在视觉感知中的驱动作用。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jul 26;37(30):7219-7230. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3929-16.2017. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A multiplex of connectome trajectories enables several connectivity patterns in parallel.连接组轨迹的多重性能够并行实现多种连接模式。
Elife. 2025 Jun 13;13:RP98777. doi: 10.7554/eLife.98777.
2
Context-Sensitive Conscious Interpretation and Layer-5 Pyramidal Neurons in Multistable Perception.多稳态感知中的上下文敏感意识解释与第5层锥体神经元
Brain Behav. 2025 Mar;15(3):e70393. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70393.
3
Pre-stimulus activities affect subsequent visual processing: Empirical evidence and potential neural mechanisms.刺激前活动影响后续视觉处理:实证证据与潜在神经机制。

本文引用的文献

1
Bistable perception: neural bases and usefulness in psychological research.双稳态知觉:神经基础及其在心理学研究中的效用
Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2018 Jul-Dec;11(2):63-76. doi: 10.21500/20112084.3375.
2
How Do Expectations Shape Perception?期望如何塑造感知?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Sep;22(9):764-779. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
3
Input-dependent modulation of MEG gamma oscillations reflects gain control in the visual cortex.输入依赖性调制的 MEG 伽马振荡反映了视觉皮层中的增益控制。
Brain Behav. 2025 Feb;15(2):e3654. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3654.
4
Spontaneous slow cortical potentials and brain oscillations independently influence conscious visual perception.自发性慢皮层电位和脑振荡独立影响有意识的视觉感知。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Jan 16;23(1):e3002964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002964. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Relevance of pre-stimulus oscillatory activity for the perceived valence of emotional facial expressions.情绪面部表情感知效价的前刺激振荡活动的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 20;14(1):19263. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69433-0.
6
Network mechanisms of ongoing brain activity's influence on conscious visual perception.持续脑活动对意识视觉感知影响的网络机制。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 8;15(1):5720. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50102-9.
7
Bias in Prestimulus Motor Cortical Activity Determines Decision-making Error in Rodents.刺激前运动皮层活动中的偏差决定啮齿动物的决策错误。
Exp Neurobiol. 2023 Aug 31;32(4):271-284. doi: 10.5607/en23020.
8
Accounting for endogenous effects in decision-making with a non-linear diffusion decision model.用非线性扩散决策模型来解释决策中的内源性效应。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 18;13(1):6323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32841-9.
9
Pre-stimulus Alpha Activity Modulates Face and Object Processing in the Intra-Parietal Sulcus, a MEG Study.一项MEG研究:刺激前阿尔法活动调节顶内沟中的面孔和物体加工
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 May 2;16:831781. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.831781. eCollection 2022.
10
Preparatory delta phase response is correlated with naturalistic speech comprehension performance.预备δ波相位反应与自然语言理解能力相关。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Apr;16(2):337-352. doi: 10.1007/s11571-021-09711-z. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
Sci Rep. 2018 May 31;8(1):8451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26779-6.
4
Top-Down Control of Alpha Phase Adjustment in Anticipation of Temporally Predictable Visual Stimuli.自上而下控制对时间可预测视觉刺激的 Alpha 相位调整。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Aug;30(8):1157-1169. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01280. Epub 2018 May 15.
5
Top-down beta oscillatory signaling conveys behavioral context in early visual cortex.自上而下的β振荡信号在早期视觉皮层中传递行为背景信息。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 3;8(1):6991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25267-1.
6
Frequency modulation of neural oscillations according to visual task demands.根据视觉任务需求对神经振荡进行调频。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 6;115(6):1346-1351. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713318115. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
7
Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance.刺激前 EEG 功率可预测意识清醒度,但不能预测客观视觉绩效。
eNeuro. 2017 Dec 12;4(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0182-17.2017. eCollection 2017 Nov-Dec.
8
Discrete and continuous mechanisms of temporal selection in rapid visual streams.快速视觉流中时间选择的离散和连续机制。
Nat Commun. 2017 Dec 5;8(1):1955. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02079-x.
9
Multistable Perception and the Role of the Frontoparietal Cortex in Perceptual Inference.多稳态感知与前额顶叶皮层在知觉推断中的作用。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:77-103. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010417-085944. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
10
Prefrontal cortex modulates posterior alpha oscillations during top-down guided visual perception.前额皮质在自上而下引导的视觉感知过程中调节后顶叶α 振荡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 29;114(35):9457-9462. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705965114. Epub 2017 Aug 14.