• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Chinese EPOCH Measure of Adolescent Wellbeing: Further Testing of the Psychometrics of the Measure.中国青少年幸福感的EPOCH量表:该量表心理测量学的进一步测试
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 3;10:1457. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01457. eCollection 2019.
2
Testing the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the EPOCH measure of adolescent well-being.测试瑞典版 EPOCH 青少年幸福感量表的心理测量学特性。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 29;16(10):e0259191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259191. eCollection 2021.
3
The EPOCH Measure of Adolescent Well-Being.青少年幸福感的EPOCH衡量标准。
Psychol Assess. 2016 May;28(5):586-97. doi: 10.1037/pas0000201. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
4
Translation and psychometric properties of the Persian version of self-management of type 1 diabetes for adolescents.青少年1型糖尿病自我管理波斯语版本的翻译及心理测量特性
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jul 1;29(7):761-7. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2015-0403.
5
Chinese Version of the Nine Item ARFID Screen: Psychometric Properties and Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance.九项 ARFID 筛查简体中文版:心理测量学特性和跨文化测量不变性。
Assessment. 2021 Mar;28(2):537-550. doi: 10.1177/1073191120936359. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
6
Assessing adolescents' positive psychological functioning at school: Development and validation of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire.评估青少年在学校的积极心理功能:学生主观幸福感问卷的编制与验证
Sch Psychol Q. 2015 Dec;30(4):534-552. doi: 10.1037/spq0000088. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
7
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale: prevalence and demographic correlates of orthorexia nervosa among Chinese university students.中文版杜塞尔多夫饮食失调量表的心理测量特性:中国大学生饮食失调症的患病率及人口统计学相关性。
Eat Weight Disord. 2019 Jun;24(3):453-463. doi: 10.1007/s40519-019-00656-1. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
8
The psychometric properties of the 5-item gratitude questionnaire in Chinese adolescents.中文版5项感恩问卷在中国青少年中的心理测量学特性。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 May;24(4):203-210. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12372.
9
Examining the Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Life Orientation Test in Older Chinese Immigrants.考察中文版生活取向测验在老年中国移民中的因子结构和心理测量特性。
Psychol Rep. 2020 Dec;123(6):2617-2636. doi: 10.1177/0033294119868800. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
10
Psychometric properties of the Chinese Family Assessment Instrument: evidence from mainland China.《中国家庭评估工具的心理测量学特性:来自中国大陆的证据》
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 11;14:1290224. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1290224. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical activity and two-year change in adolescent well-being in nine countries.九个国家青少年幸福感的体育活动与两年变化情况
J Res Adolesc. 2025 Jun;35(2):e70035. doi: 10.1111/jora.70035.
2
Adolescent hope and optimism: A scoping review of measures and their psychometric properties.青少年的希望与乐观:对相关测量方法及其心理测量特性的范围综述。
Afr J Psychol Assess. 2023 Sep 26;5:137. doi: 10.4102/ajopa.v5i0.137. eCollection 2023.
3
Psychological well-being and its associated factors among university students in Sichuan, China.中国四川大学生的心理健康及其相关因素
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 27;16:1473871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1473871. eCollection 2025.
4
If you're happy and you know it: neural correlates of self-evaluated psychological health and well-being.如果你感到快乐并且知道它:自我评估的心理健康和幸福感的神经相关物。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Nov 20;18(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad065.
5
Dysregulation profile in children of ethnoracially diverse at-risk families: Factor structure and longitudinal correlates.不同种族和高危家庭儿童的失调特征:因素结构和纵向相关性。
Dev Psychopathol. 2024 May;36(2):787-798. doi: 10.1017/S095457942300007X. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
6
Measuring Happiness in Adolescent Samples: A Systematic Review.青少年样本中的幸福感测量:一项系统综述。
Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 8;9(2):227. doi: 10.3390/children9020227.
7
Testing the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the EPOCH measure of adolescent well-being.测试瑞典版 EPOCH 青少年幸福感量表的心理测量学特性。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 29;16(10):e0259191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259191. eCollection 2021.
8
The Network Structure of Adolescent Well-Being Traits: Results From a Large-Scale Chinese Sample.青少年幸福感特质的网络结构:来自大规模中国样本的结果。
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 20;10:2783. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02783. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The EPOCH Measure of Adolescent Well-Being.青少年幸福感的EPOCH衡量标准。
Psychol Assess. 2016 May;28(5):586-97. doi: 10.1037/pas0000201. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
2
Personality, well-being, and health.人格、幸福感与健康。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:719-42. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115123.
3
Integrating prospective longitudinal data: modeling personality and health in the Terman Life Cycle and Hawaii Longitudinal Studies.整合前瞻性纵向数据:在特曼生命周期研究和夏威夷纵向研究中对人格和健康进行建模。
Dev Psychol. 2014 May;50(5):1390-406. doi: 10.1037/a0030874. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
4
Establishing measurement invariance: English and Spanish Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire.建立测量不变性:儿童哮喘生活质量问卷的英文和西班牙文版本。
Nurs Res. 2012 May-Jun;61(3):171-80. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182544750.
5
Integrative data analysis: the simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets.整合数据分析:对多个数据集进行同步分析。
Psychol Methods. 2009 Jun;14(2):81-100. doi: 10.1037/a0015914.
6
Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals.坚毅:对长期目标的坚持不懈和热情。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;92(6):1087-101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087.
7
What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect.主观李克特量表的跨文化比较存在什么问题?:参照群体效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):903-18.
8
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.自我决定理论与内在动机、社会发展和幸福感的促进
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68.
9
On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being.论幸福与人类潜能:享乐主义幸福与实现自我幸福的研究综述
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:141-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.

中国青少年幸福感的EPOCH量表:该量表心理测量学的进一步测试

The Chinese EPOCH Measure of Adolescent Wellbeing: Further Testing of the Psychometrics of the Measure.

作者信息

Zeng Guang, Kern Margaret L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 3;10:1457. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01457. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01457
PMID:31333530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6617957/
Abstract

Given the enormous population of Chinese-speaking people worldwide, it is important to establish measures of adolescent wellbeing with adequate evidence for reliability and validity. The EPOCH Measure of Adolescent Wellbeing assesses five positive psychological characteristics (engagement, perseverance, optimism, connectedness, and happiness). An initial study with the English version of the measure found support for a five-factor structure, and evidence for internal reliability, convergence with other wellbeing measures, and divergence across factors and with unrelated constructs. An initial study translated the measure into Chinese and found support for the factor structure of the measure. To further test the measure's psychometric properties, data were collected from 11 Chinese student samples ( = 17,854) from several regions of China. All students completed the EPOCH measure, along with a variety of other measures. In cases where measures overlapped, samples were combined, with relevant sub-sets used to examine convergent and divergent patterns. Confirmatory analyses supported the five-factor structure and factors were internally reliable, but consistency over time was low. The five factors were more strongly correlated with other wellbeing factors than with illbeing factors. While some correlations demonstrated expected convergent and divergent patterns with other constructs, there were also considerable deviations from expected patterns. Norm values specific to the Chinese version of the measure are provided. The study supports the EPOCH measure as a useful cross-sectional tool for measuring adolescent positive functioning, but additional consideration of cross time stability, change, and correlations with other constructs is needed.

摘要

鉴于全球说中文的人口众多,建立具有充分可靠性和有效性证据的青少年幸福感衡量标准非常重要。《青少年幸福感的时代衡量标准》评估了五个积极的心理特征(参与度、毅力、乐观主义、人际关系和幸福感)。对该衡量标准英文版本的初步研究发现了对五因素结构的支持,以及内部可靠性、与其他幸福感衡量标准的趋同性、各因素之间以及与不相关结构的差异性的证据。一项初步研究将该衡量标准翻译成中文,并发现了对该衡量标准因素结构的支持。为了进一步测试该衡量标准的心理测量特性,从中国几个地区的11个中国学生样本(n = 17,854)中收集了数据。所有学生都完成了《时代衡量标准》以及各种其他衡量标准。在衡量标准重叠的情况下,将样本合并,并使用相关子集来检验趋同和差异模式。验证性分析支持五因素结构,各因素内部可靠,但随时间的一致性较低。这五个因素与其他幸福感因素的相关性比与不良因素的相关性更强。虽然一些相关性显示出与其他结构预期的趋同和差异模式,但也存在与预期模式的相当大偏差。提供了该衡量标准中文版的常模值。该研究支持《时代衡量标准》作为衡量青少年积极功能的有用横断面工具,但需要进一步考虑跨时间稳定性、变化以及与其他结构的相关性。