Department of Engineering and Public Policy, and Institute for Politics and Strategy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA; email:
Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA; email:
Annu Rev Psychol. 2020 Jan 4;71:331-355. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050747. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
The science of judgment and decision making involves three interrelated forms of research: analysis of the decisions people face, description of their natural responses, and interventions meant to help them do better. After briefly introducing the field's intellectual foundations, we review recent basic research into the three core elements of decision making: judgment, or how people predict the outcomes that will follow possible choices; preference, or how people weigh those outcomes; and choice, or how people combine judgments and preferences to reach a decision. We then review research into two potential sources of behavioral heterogeneity: individual differences in decision-making competence and developmental changes across the life span. Next, we illustrate applications intended to improve individual and organizational decision making in health, public policy, intelligence analysis, and risk management. We emphasize the potential value of coupling analytical and behavioral research and having basic and applied research inform one another.
分析人们面临的决策、描述他们的自然反应,以及旨在帮助他们做得更好的干预措施。在简要介绍该领域的知识基础后,我们回顾了最近关于决策的三个核心要素的基础研究:判断,即人们如何预测可能选择的结果;偏好,即人们如何权衡这些结果;以及选择,即人们如何结合判断和偏好做出决策。然后,我们回顾了关于行为异质性的两个潜在来源的研究:决策能力的个体差异和整个生命周期的发展变化。接下来,我们举例说明了旨在改善健康、公共政策、情报分析和风险管理中的个人和组织决策的应用。我们强调了将分析和行为研究相结合并使基础研究和应用研究相互借鉴的潜在价值。