• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项多领域范围综述的方案,旨在确定老年人群决策能力的衡量指标。

Protocol for a multi-domain scoping review to identify measures of decision-making ability in an ageing population.

作者信息

Ho Emily H, Ece Berivan, Novack Miriam A, Pila Sarah, Karpouzian-Rogers Tatiana, Mather Molly A, Dworak Elizabeth McManus, Hosseinian Zahra, Bucko Patricia, Kaat Aaron James, Han S Duke, Lichtenberg Peter, Hanmer Janel, Miller Corinne H, Gershon Richard, Weintraub Sandra

机构信息

Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 22;14(12):e084178. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084178.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084178
PMID:39806701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11664363/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Deficits in decision-making (DM) can lead to adverse outcomes across multiple domains such as financial management and medical care. By hindering such DM abilities, cognitive impairment (CI) often affects quality of life. Routine screening for CI, however, does not include systematic and comprehensive assessment of DM ability. While there are many DM measures, there is considerable heterogeneity in what constructs are measured and the populations in which they have been validated. This scoping review protocol details the proposed comprehensive examination of published literature on DM measures used in adults aged 45 years and older.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) scoping review methodology framework will guide the current scoping review. We will systematically search Embase (Elsevier), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ebsco), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Web of Science (Clarivate) and Scopus (Elsevier) to identify the studies meeting our eligibility criteria. We will review literature published between January 2018 and November 2023. Following best practice recommendations, a two-stage study selection process will be applied. First, titles and abstracts will be independently reviewed by two reviewers based on our eligibility criteria. Second, full texts will be screened and data will be extracted only from the articles included after the full review. The results of the current scoping review will be reported in adherence to PRISMA-Scr guidelines.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study does not require ethics approval as the scoping review methodology involves reviewing results from publicly available published materials. Results of the scoping review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NIA grant number 1U24AG082022-01.

摘要

引言

决策能力缺陷会在财务管理和医疗保健等多个领域导致不良后果。认知障碍会阻碍这些决策能力,进而常常影响生活质量。然而,认知障碍的常规筛查并不包括对决策能力的系统全面评估。虽然有许多决策测量方法,但在测量的结构和已验证的人群方面存在相当大的异质性。本范围综述方案详细介绍了拟对45岁及以上成年人决策测量的已发表文献进行的全面审查。

方法与分析

阿克西和奥马利(2005年)的范围综述方法框架将指导本次范围综述。我们将系统检索Embase(爱思唯尔)、MEDLINE(Ovid)、PsycINFO(Ebsco)、Cochrane图书馆(威利)、科学引文索引(科睿唯安)和Scopus(爱思唯尔),以识别符合我们纳入标准的研究。我们将回顾2018年1月至2023年11月发表的文献。遵循最佳实践建议,将应用两阶段的研究选择过程。首先,两位评审员将根据我们的纳入标准独立评审标题和摘要。其次,将筛选全文,仅从全面评审后纳入的文章中提取数据。本次范围综述的结果将按照PRISMA-Scr指南进行报告。

伦理与传播

本研究无需伦理批准,因为范围综述方法涉及审查公开可用的已发表材料的结果。范围综述的结果将提交至同行评审期刊发表。

试验注册号

美国国立衰老研究所资助号1U24AG082022-01。

相似文献

1
Protocol for a multi-domain scoping review to identify measures of decision-making ability in an ageing population.一项多领域范围综述的方案,旨在确定老年人群决策能力的衡量指标。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 22;14(12):e084178. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084178.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
6
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
7
Characteristics of programmes designed to link community-dwelling older adults in high-income countries from community to clinical sectors: a scoping review protocol.旨在将高收入国家社区居住的老年人群从社区连接到临床领域的方案的特点:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 12;13(9):e072617. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072617.
8
Healthy ageing and occupational therapy in South Asian countries: a scoping review protocol.健康老龄化与南亚国家的职业疗法:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 5;11(5):e044657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044657.
9
Patient engagement, treatment preferences and shared decision-making in the treatment of opioid use disorder in adults: a scoping review protocol.成人阿片类物质使用障碍治疗中的患者参与、治疗偏好与共同决策:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 17;8(10):e022267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022267.
10
Family participation in dignity interventions for patients with cancer receiving palliative care: a scoping review protocol.家庭参与对接受姑息治疗的癌症患者的尊严干预:一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 15;14(12):e090338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090338.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification and synthesis of end-of-life decision-making measures: a scoping review.临终决策措施的识别与综合:一项范围综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 31;12:1540486. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1540486. eCollection 2025.
2
Measures of healthcare decision-making ability in cognitive aging: a scoping review from the Advancing Reliable Measurement in Cognitive Aging and Decision-Making Ability (ARMCADA) research initiative.认知衰老中医疗保健决策能力的测量:来自认知衰老与决策能力可靠测量推进(ARMCADA)研究计划的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 12;13:1582764. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1582764. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Recent Advances in Neuropsychological Test Interpretation for Clinical Practice.临床实践中神经心理学测试解释的最新进展。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Jun;34(2):637-667. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09596-1. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
Management of Financial Assets by Older Adults With and Without Dementia or Other Cognitive Impairments.老年人管理金融资产:痴呆症或其他认知障碍患者与非痴呆症或非认知障碍患者的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231436. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31436.
3
Methodological guidance for rapid reviews in healthcare: A scoping review.
Measures of decision-making ability and functional outcomes in older adults: results from a scoping review in the ARMCADA study.
老年人决策能力与功能结局的测量:ARMCADA研究的范围综述结果
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 21;16:1540493. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1540493. eCollection 2025.
4
A scoping review of financial decision-making measures in midlife and beyond: results from the advancing reliable measurement in cognitive aging and decision-making ability (ARMCADA) study.中年及以后财务决策测量的范围综述:认知衰老与决策能力可靠测量进展(ARMCADA)研究的结果
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 17;16:1540508. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1540508. eCollection 2025.
医疗保健快速审查方法学指南:范围综述。
Res Synth Methods. 2022 Jul;13(4):394-404. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1555. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
4
Impact of Early Life Socioeconomic Status on Decision Making in Older Adults Without Dementia.早年社会经济地位对无痴呆老年成人决策的影响。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Jul-Aug;95:104432. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104432. Epub 2021 May 9.
5
Global Cognitive Impairment Prevalence and Incidence in Community Dwelling Older Adults-A Systematic Review.社区居住老年人中全球认知障碍的患病率和发病率——一项系统综述
Geriatrics (Basel). 2020 Oct 27;5(4):84. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics5040084.
6
How does decisional capacity evolve with normal cognitive aging: systematic review of the literature.正常认知衰老过程中决策能力如何演变:文献系统回顾。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2020 Feb;11(1):117-129. doi: 10.1007/s41999-019-00251-8. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
7
Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.老年人认知障碍筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):757-763. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0435.
8
Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.老年人认知障碍筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):764-785. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22258.
9
Judgment and Decision Making.判断与决策。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2020 Jan 4;71:331-355. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050747. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
10
Current Status of Cognitive Remediation for Psychiatric Disorders: A Review.精神疾病认知矫正的现状:综述
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 1;9:461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00461. eCollection 2018.