Tonso Victor Martins, Yamauchi Fernando Ide, Mussi Thais Caldara, Figueiredo Eduardo, Baroni Ronaldo Hueb
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
General Electric's Health Care, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2019 Jul 18;17(3):eAO4615. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AO4615.
To compare qualitatively and quantitatively, in terms of image quality, a new biexponential diffusion sequence protocol with the standard monoexponential diffusion protocol on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging.
This study had a prospective data collection and cross-sectional analysis. Between August and November 2017, a total of 70 patients who underwent multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging due to clinical suspicion of prostatic neoplasia were recruited. The images obtained were evaluated by two independent readers regarding subjective/qualitative criteria (six criteria) and objective/quantitative criteria (three criteria), always comparing the monoexponential to biexponential acquisition protocols. The results were compared by statistical analysis (interobserver agreement - Gwet coefficient; analysis of the qualitative variables - Stuart-Maxwell test; and analysis of the quantitative variables - Wilcoxon test).
After exclusion of four patients, the final sample consisted of 66 patients. A good/excellent inter observer agreement was stablished for subjective criteria (except in one criteria). For the qualitative analysis the amount of good or excellent evaluations was higher for the monoexponential protocol (except in one category), with evidence of significant differences for three criteria (diffusion weighted imaging global quality; diffusion weighted imaging signal-to-noise ratio; and apparent diffusion coefficient signal-to-noise ratio). For the quantitative data analysis, the monoexponential protocol showed less variability of the anteroposterior diameters, meaning less distortion of the images, and better estimated signal-to-noise ratio.
In our data, the quality of the images of the monoexponential standard diffusion sequence was qualitatively and quantitatively superior to those of the biexponential diffusion weighted imaging sequence.
在多参数前列腺磁共振成像中,从图像质量方面对一种新的双指数扩散序列协议与标准单指数扩散协议进行定性和定量比较。
本研究采用前瞻性数据收集和横断面分析。2017年8月至11月期间,共招募了70例因临床怀疑前列腺肿瘤而接受多参数前列腺磁共振成像的患者。由两名独立的阅片者根据主观/定性标准(六个标准)和客观/定量标准(三个标准)对获得的图像进行评估,始终将单指数采集协议与双指数采集协议进行比较。通过统计分析(观察者间一致性 - Gwet系数;定性变量分析 - Stuart-Maxwell检验;定量变量分析 - Wilcoxon检验)比较结果。
排除4例患者后,最终样本包括66例患者。主观标准(除一项标准外)建立了良好/优秀的观察者间一致性。对于定性分析,单指数协议的良好或优秀评估数量更高(除一类外),有三个标准存在显著差异的证据(扩散加权成像整体质量;扩散加权成像信噪比;表观扩散系数信噪比)。对于定量数据分析,单指数协议显示前后径的变异性较小,这意味着图像的失真较小,并且信噪比估计更好。
在我们的数据中,单指数标准扩散序列的图像质量在定性和定量方面均优于双指数扩散加权成像序列。