Visiting Researcher, Centre for Development and Emergency Practice, School of Architecture, Oxford Brookes University, United Kingdom.
Senior Lecturer, Centre for Development and Emergency Practice, School of Architecture, Oxford Brookes University, United Kingdom.
Disasters. 2020 Apr;44(2):307-335. doi: 10.1111/disa.12397. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
The humanitarian sector is increasingly aware of the role that good quality evidence plays in the underpinning of effective and accountable practice. This review addresses the need for reliable evidence by evaluating current knowledge about the intersection of two key outcome targets of post-disaster shelter response: supporting shelter self-recovery and building back safer. Evidence about post-disaster shelter programmes that aim to improve hazard resistance while supporting shelter self-recovery has been systematically analysed and evaluated. Technical support, especially training in safer construction techniques, was found to be a central programme feature, but the impact of this and other programme attributes on building safety was largely not ascertainable. Programme reports and studies lack sufficient detail, especially on the hazard resistance of repaired houses. Accounts of shelter programmes need to include more reliable reporting of key activities and assessment of outcomes, in order to contribute to the growing evidence base in this field.
人道主义部门越来越意识到高质量证据在支持有效和负责任的实践中的作用。本审查通过评估有关灾后避难所反应两个关键结果目标交叉点的现有知识，来解决对可靠证据的需求：支持避难所自我恢复和更安全地重建。对旨在提高抗灾能力同时支持避难所自我恢复的灾后避难所方案的证据进行了系统的分析和评估。技术支持，特别是更安全的施工技术培训，被发现是方案的核心特征，但这种支持以及其他方案属性对建筑安全的影响在很大程度上无法确定。方案报告和研究缺乏足够的细节，特别是关于修复房屋的抗灾能力。为了为这一领域不断增长的证据基础做出贡献，需要更可靠地报告关键活动并评估结果。
