Lecturer, School of Civil Engineering, University of Sydney, Australia.
Associate Professor, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, United States.
Disasters. 2019 Oct;43(4):926-953. doi: 10.1111/disa.12405. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
Participation has long been considered important for post-disaster recovery. Establishing what constitutes participation in post-disaster shelter projects, however, has remained elusive, and the links between different types of participation and shelter programme outcomes are not well understood. Furthermore, recent case studies suggest that misguided participation strategies may be to blame for failures. This study analysed 19 shelter projects implemented in the Philippines following Typhoon Haiyan in November 2013 to identify the forms of participation employed. Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, it assessed how household participation in the planning, design, and construction phases of shelter reconstruction led to outcomes of household satisfaction and safe shelter design. Participation was operationalised via eight central project tasks, revealing that the involvement of households in the early planning stages of projects and in construction activities were important for satisfaction and design outcomes, whereas engagement during the design phase of projects had little impact on the selected outcomes.
参与长期以来一直被认为对灾后恢复很重要。然而，参与灾后避难所项目的具体构成仍然难以捉摸，不同类型的参与和避难所项目成果之间的联系也不为人所知。此外，最近的案例研究表明，参与策略有误可能是失败的原因。本研究分析了 2013 年 11 月台风“海燕”袭击菲律宾后实施的 19 个避难所项目，以确定所采用的参与形式。该研究采用模糊集定性比较分析方法，评估了家庭在规划、设计和建造阶段参与避难所重建对家庭满意度和安全设计的影响。参与是通过八项核心项目任务来实施的，结果表明，家庭在项目早期规划阶段和建设活动中的参与对满意度和设计成果很重要，而项目设计阶段的参与对选定成果几乎没有影响。
