Department of Public Health Sciences, Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States of America.
Department of Psychology, Center for the Study on Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0220300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220300. eCollection 2019.
The capability of electronic cigarette devices (e-cigs) to deliver nicotine is key to their potential to replace combustible cigarettes. We compared nicotine delivery and subjective effects associated with the use of two classes of e-cigarettes and cigarettes.
14 e-cigarette users were instructed to vape their own e-cigarette device every 20 seconds for 10 minutes while blood was drawn at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12, and 15 minutes after initiating vaping. Users rated withdrawal symptoms and side effects before and after vaping. E-cigarette devices were classified as first-generation (same size as cigarette, no activation button) or advanced (larger than cigarette with an activation button). Separately, 10 cigarette smokers completed a similar protocol. Fisher's Exact Test and two-sided t-tests were used as appropriate to determine differences in outcomes between first-generation e-cigarette users, advanced e-cigarette users, and smokers.
Compared to first-generation devices, advanced devices were associated with greater serum nicotine Cmax (ng/ml) (11.5 v. 2.8, p = 0.0231) and greater nicotine boost (ng/ml) (10.8 v. 1.8, p = 0.0177). Overall, e-cigarettes users experienced a significant reduction in withdrawal and craving, although there were no significant differences between users of first-generation and advanced devices. Comparing e-cigarettes overall to cigarettes, cigarettes were associated with greater Cmax (25.9 v. 9.0, p = 0.0043) and greater nicotine boost (21.0 v. 8.2, p = 0.0128).
Advanced e-cigarettes delivered significantly more nicotine than first-generation devices but less than combustible cigarettes. Overall, e-cigarette use was associated with a reduction in withdrawal and craving with no reported side effects. The wide variation in nicotine absorption from different e-cigarette devices should be considered in studies of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.
电子烟设备(电子烟)输送尼古丁的能力是其替代可燃香烟的潜力的关键。我们比较了两类电子烟和香烟的尼古丁输送和使用相关的主观效果。
14 名电子烟使用者被指示每隔 20 秒使用自己的电子烟设备抽一次,每次抽吸 10 分钟,在开始抽吸后 1、2、4、6、8、10、12 和 15 分钟采血。使用者在抽吸前后评估戒断症状和副作用。电子烟装置被分类为第一代(与香烟大小相同,没有激活按钮)或高级(大于香烟,带有激活按钮)。此外,10 名吸烟者完成了类似的方案。适当使用 Fisher 精确检验和双侧 t 检验来确定第一代电子烟使用者、高级电子烟使用者和吸烟者之间结果的差异。
与第一代装置相比,高级装置与血清尼古丁 Cmax(ng/ml)更高(11.5 v. 2.8,p = 0.0231)和尼古丁提升更大(10.8 v. 1.8,p = 0.0177)。总体而言,电子烟使用者的戒断和渴望感显著降低,尽管第一代和高级装置使用者之间没有显著差异。将电子烟与香烟进行整体比较,香烟与更高的 Cmax(25.9 v. 9.0,p = 0.0043)和更大的尼古丁提升(21.0 v. 8.2,p = 0.0128)相关。
高级电子烟输送的尼古丁明显多于第一代装置,但少于可燃香烟。总体而言,电子烟的使用与戒断和渴望感的降低相关,且没有报告副作用。不同电子烟装置的尼古丁吸收差异较大,在电子烟戒烟研究中应予以考虑。