Latulippe Karine, Provencher Véronique, Boivin Katia, Vincent Claude, Guay Manon, Kairy Dahlia, Morales Ernesto, Pellerin Marc-André, Giroux Dominique
Center of Excellence on Aging Quebec, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Department of Teaching and Learning Studies, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jan 14;8(1):e11674. doi: 10.2196/11674.
Occupational therapists working in hospitals are usually involved in discharge planning to assess patients' safety and autonomy upon returning home. However, their assessment is usually done at the hospital due to organizational and financial constraints. The lack of visual data about the patients' home may thus reduce the appropriateness and applicability of the support recommended upon discharge. Although various technological tools such as mobile devices (mobile health) are promising methods for home-based distance assessment, their application in hospital settings may raise several feasibility issues. To our knowledge, their usefulness and added value compared to standard procedure have not been addressed yet in previous studies. Moreover, several feasibility issues need to be explored.
This paper aims to (1) document the clinical feasibility of using an electronic tablet to assess the patient's home environment by mobile videoconferencing and (2) explore the added value of using mobile videoconferencing, compared to the standard procedure.
A feasibility and comparative study using a mixed-methods (convergent) design is currently undergoing. Six occupational therapists will assess the home environment of their patients in the hospital setting: they will first perform a semistructured interview (a) and then use mobile videoconferencing (b) to compare "a versus a+b." Interviews with occupational therapists and patients and their caregivers will further explore the advantages and disadvantages of mobile videoconferencing. Two valid tools are used (the Canadian Measure of Occupational Performance and the telehealth responsivity questionnaire). Direct and indirect time is also collected.
The project was funded in the spring of 2016 and authorized by the ethics committee in February 2017. Enrollment started in April 2017. Five triads (n=4 occupational therapists, n=5 clients, n=5 caregivers) have been recruited until now. The experiment is expected to be completed by April 2019 and analysis of the results by June 2019.
Mobile videoconferencing may be a familiar and easy solution for visualizing environmental barriers in the home by caregivers and clinicians, thus providing a promising and inexpensive option to promote a safe return home upon hospital discharge, but clinical feasibility and obstacles to the use of mobile videoconferencing must be understood.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/11674.
在医院工作的职业治疗师通常参与出院计划,以评估患者回家后的安全性和自主性。然而,由于组织和财务方面的限制,他们的评估通常在医院进行。因此,缺乏患者家中的视觉数据可能会降低出院时所推荐支持措施的适当性和适用性。尽管各种技术工具,如移动设备(移动健康)是用于家庭远程评估的有前景的方法,但其在医院环境中的应用可能会引发一些可行性问题。据我们所知,与标准程序相比,它们的有用性和附加值在以往的研究中尚未得到探讨。此外,还需要探索几个可行性问题。
本文旨在(1)记录使用电子平板电脑通过移动视频会议评估患者家庭环境的临床可行性,以及(2)探讨与标准程序相比,使用移动视频会议的附加值。
目前正在进行一项采用混合方法(收敛性)设计的可行性和比较性研究。六位职业治疗师将在医院环境中评估他们患者的家庭环境:他们将首先进行半结构化访谈(a),然后使用移动视频会议(b)来比较“a与a + b”。对职业治疗师、患者及其照顾者的访谈将进一步探讨移动视频会议的优缺点。使用两种有效的工具(加拿大职业表现测量工具和远程医疗反应性问卷)。还收集直接和间接时间。
该项目于2016年春季获得资助,并于2017年2月获得伦理委员会批准。招募工作于2017年4月开始。截至目前,已招募了五个三人小组(4名职业治疗师、5名患者、5名照顾者)。预计实验将于2019年4月完成,结果分析将于2019年6月完成。
移动视频会议对于照顾者和临床医生来说可能是一种熟悉且便捷的解决方案,用于可视化家中的环境障碍,从而为促进患者出院后安全回家提供一种有前景且廉价的选择,但必须了解移动视频会议的临床可行性和使用障碍。
国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/11674