Watkins C Edward, Hook Joshua N, Owen Jesse, DeBlaere Cirleen, Davis Don E, Callahan Jennifer L
Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Union Circle # 311280, Denton, TX, 76203, USA.
Counseling Psychology Department, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Am J Psychoanal. 2019 Sep;79(3):352-374. doi: 10.1057/s11231-019-09203-4.
Although recognized as highly crucial to supervision practice (e.g., Tummala-Narra, 2004), culture has been addressed minimally in the psychoanalytic supervision literature. Calls to remedy that limitation have been made and making culture matter has been identified as a most pressing need for psychoanalytic supervision. But how then do we as supervisors go about doing that? How might we better position culture in, and make culture central to, our psychoanalytic supervisory conceptualization and conduct? We subsequently take up those questions, expanding upon our earlier proposals about cultural humility and the Cultural Third (Watkins and Hook, 2016) by (a) proposing a tripartite multicultural perspective (i.e., cultural humility-cultural comfort-cultural opportunities) as supervision sine qua non; (b) using recognition theory as a way to better understand that very process of Third creation and elaboration; and (c) providing a rupture/repair case example that shows efforts to create and build the Cultural Third in supervision. The Cultural Third is conceptualized as a product of doers-doing with so as to culturally learn together through "not knowing".
