Diana Alessia, Boyle Laura Ann, García Manzanilla Edgar, Leonard Finola Catherine, Calderón Díaz Julia Adriana
Pig Development Department, Teagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork Ireland.
2School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Porcine Health Manag. 2019 Jul 15;5:19. doi: 10.1186/s40813-019-0126-9. eCollection 2019.
Pig performance and risk of disease are associated with production flow. Given the link between health and welfare, it is likely that animal welfare indicators are also associated with production flow. This study investigated the association between production flow and tail, ear and skin lesions on a farm with a purported 'all-in/all-out' policy. This was an observational study whereby pigs were managed according to routine farm practice. A total of 1,016 pigs born within 1 week from the same batch were followed through the production stages and the presence or absence of welfare indicators was recorded at 4, 7, 9, 12, 16 and 24 weeks of age. Three production flows were retrospectively identified: flow 1 = 'normal' pigs that advanced through the production stages together 'on time', flow 2 = pigs delayed from advancing from the 1 to the 2 nursery stage by 1 week and flow 3 = pigs delayed from advancing through the production stages by > 1 week. A nested case control design was applied by matching pigs by sow parity, number of born alive and birth weight.
The presence of ear lesions was 4.5 less likely in pigs in flow 2 and 2.9 times less likely in pigs in flow 3 ( < 0.001) compared to pigs in flow 1. Pigs in flow 3 were 2.2 more likely to have tail and 1.6 times more likely to have ear lesions (P < 0.001) compared to pigs in flow 2. Pigs in flow 2 were less likely to have tail lesions compared with pigs in flow 1 ( < 0.05). Differences between production flows for the risk of skin lesions varied according to age (P < 0.05).
All production flows were associated with a high risk of lesions which raises concerns for pig welfare. However, risks for ear, tail and skin lesions varied according to each production flow likely due to the specific management practices inherent to each flow. Results from this study could be used to modify existing management practices, thus leading to improvements in animal welfare and possibly performance in intensive pig systems.
猪的生产性能和疾病风险与生产流程相关。鉴于健康与福利之间的联系,动物福利指标可能也与生产流程相关。本研究调查了一个声称实行“全进/全出”政策的农场中生产流程与猪的尾巴、耳朵和皮肤损伤之间的关联。这是一项观察性研究,猪按照农场常规做法进行管理。对同一批次在1周内出生的总共1016头猪进行跟踪,记录它们在4、7、9、12、16和24周龄时福利指标的有无情况。回顾性地确定了三种生产流程:流程1 = 按时一起顺利通过各生产阶段的“正常”猪;流程2 = 从第一保育阶段进入第二保育阶段延迟1周的猪;流程3 = 整个生产阶段延迟超过1周的猪。采用巢式病例对照设计,按照母猪胎次、活产仔猪数和出生体重对猪进行匹配。
与流程1的猪相比,流程2的猪出现耳部损伤的可能性低4.5倍,流程3的猪出现耳部损伤的可能性低2.9倍(<0.001)。与流程2的猪相比,流程3的猪出现尾巴损伤的可能性高2.2倍,出现耳部损伤的可能性高1.6倍(P<0.001)。与流程1的猪相比,流程2的猪出现尾巴损伤的可能性较小(<0.05)。不同生产流程中皮肤损伤风险的差异随年龄而异(P<0.05)。
所有生产流程都与较高的损伤风险相关,这引发了对猪福利的担忧。然而,耳朵、尾巴和皮肤损伤的风险因每个生产流程而异,这可能是由于每个流程固有的特定管理方式。本研究结果可用于改进现有管理方式,从而改善集约化养猪系统中的动物福利,并可能提高生产性能。