Suppr超能文献

识别采用全进全出管理方式的猪场在控制体重变化方面面临的挑战及其对动物健康可能产生的影响:一项案例研究。

Identifying challenges to manage body weight variation in pig farms implementing all-in-all-out management practices and their possible implications for animal health: a case study.

作者信息

Rodrigues da Costa Maria, García Manzanilla Edgar, Diana Alessia, van Staaveren Nienke, Torres-Pitarch Alberto, Boyle Laura Ann, Calderón Díaz Julia Adriana

机构信息

Pig Development Department, Teagasc Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.

School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Porcine Health Manag. 2021 Jan 11;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40813-021-00190-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Managing body weight (BW) variation is a challenge in farrow-to-finish farms implementing all-in/all-out (AIAO) production systems due to the lack of "off-site" facilities to segregate slow growing pigs (SGP). This case study investigated different approaches to managing BW variation in a farrow-to-finish commercial pig farm with a self-declared AIAO management and the possible implications for animal health.

CASE PRESENTATION

A total of 1096 pigs (1047 pigs born within 1 week plus 49 pigs born 1 week later) were tracked until slaughter as they moved through the production stages. Piglets were individually tagged at birth and their location on the farm was recorded on a weekly basis. In total, 10.3% of pigs died during lactation. Four main cohorts of pigs were created at weaning and retrospectively identified: cohort 1 = pigs weaned at 21 days (4.5%); cohort 2 = pigs weaned at 28 days (81.0%), which was sub-divided at the end of the first nursery stage into sub-cohort 2a = pigs split at 3 weeks post-weaning (29.7%); sub-cohort 2b = pigs split at 3 weeks post-weaning from cohort 2a and split again 5 weeks post-weaning (35.5%) and sub-cohort 2c = remaining smaller size pigs from cohort 2b (10.9%); cohort 3 = pigs weaned at 35 days (2.7%) and cohort 4 = pigs weaned at 49 days (1.5%) that were later mixed with SPG, delayed pigs from other cohorts and sick/injured pigs that recovered. Four strategies to manage BW variation were identified: i) earlier weaning (cohort 1); ii) delayed weaning of SGP (cohort 3 and 4); iii) re-grading pens by BW (sub-cohorts 2a, 2b and 2c) and, iv) delayed movement of SGP to the next production stage (several pigs from all cohorts). A higher percentage of delayed pigs presented pericarditis, pleurisy and enzootic pneumonia like lesions at slaughter compared with pigs under other strategies.

CONCLUSION

A variety of management practices were implemented to minimise BW variation during the production cycle. However, several cohorts of pigs were created disrupting AIAO management. Earlier weaning should only be practiced under specific circumstances where optimal animal health and welfare are guaranteed. Delayed weaning of SGP and delaying pigs to move to the next production stage could negatively affect animal health and should be avoided.

摘要

背景

在采用全进全出(AIAO)生产系统的仔猪到育肥猪养殖场中,由于缺乏“场外”设施来隔离生长缓慢的猪(SGP),管理体重(BW)变化是一项挑战。本案例研究调查了一家自称采用AIAO管理的仔猪到育肥猪商业养殖场管理BW变化的不同方法以及对动物健康可能产生的影响。

案例介绍

共有1096头猪(1047头在1周内出生的猪加上49头在1周后出生的猪)在其整个生产阶段被跟踪直至屠宰。仔猪在出生时进行个体标记,并每周记录它们在农场中的位置。总共有10.3%的猪在哺乳期死亡。断奶时创建了四个主要猪群并进行回顾性识别:第1组=21日龄断奶的猪(4.5%);第2组=28日龄断奶的猪(81.0%),在第一个保育阶段结束时又细分为第2a亚组=断奶后3周分开的猪(29.7%);第2b亚组=在断奶后3周从第2a组分开并在断奶后5周再次分开的猪(35.5%)以及第2c亚组=第2b组中剩余的较小体型的猪(10.9%);第3组=35日龄断奶的猪(2.7%)和第4组=49日龄断奶的猪(1.5%),这些猪后来与生长缓慢猪、来自其他组的延迟猪以及康复的病猪/受伤猪混合。确定了四种管理BW变化的策略:i)提前断奶(第1组);ii)延迟生长缓慢猪的断奶(第3组和第4组);iii)根据体重重新分级猪栏(第2a、2b和2c亚组),以及iv)延迟生长缓慢猪进入下一个生产阶段(来自所有组的几头猪)。与其他策略下的猪相比,延迟猪在屠宰时出现心包炎、胸膜炎和地方性肺炎样病变的比例更高。

结论

实施了多种管理措施以尽量减少生产周期中的BW变化。然而,创建了几个猪群,扰乱了AIAO管理。仅在保证最佳动物健康和福利的特定情况下才应进行提前断奶。延迟生长缓慢猪的断奶以及延迟猪进入下一个生产阶段可能会对动物健康产生负面影响,应予以避免。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a954/7798213/b0274fc755df/40813_2021_190_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验