Suppr超能文献

老年医疗保险受益人在入住临终关怀后经常继续使用获益有限的药物。

Older Medicare Beneficiaries Frequently Continue Medications with Limited Benefit Following Hospice Admission.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Oct;34(10):2029-2037. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05152-x. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of medications not relieving symptoms or maximizing quality of life should be minimized following hospice enrollment.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the frequency of and predictive factors for continuation of medications with limited benefit after hospice admission among those admitted for cancer- and non-cancer-related causes.

DESIGN

Cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked database.

PATIENTS

Medicare Part D-enrolled beneficiaries 66 years and older who were admitted to and died under hospice care between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2013 (N = 70,035).

MAIN MEASURES

Patients were followed from hospice enrollment through death for Part D dispensing of limited benefit medications (LBMs) they had used in the 6 months prior to hospice admission, including anti-hyperlipidemics, anti-hypertensives, oral anti-diabetics, anti-platelets, anti-dementia medications, anti-osteoporotic medications, and proton pump inhibitors. The proportion of patients continuing an LBM after hospice admission was evaluated. Adjusted relative risks (RRs) were estimated for factors associated with LBM continuation.

KEY RESULTS

Overall, 29.8% and 30.5% of patients admitted to hospice for a cancer- and non-cancer-related cause, respectively, continued at least one LBM after hospice admission. Anti-dementia medications were continued most frequently (29.3%) while anti-osteoporotic medications were continued least often (14.1%). Compared to home hospice, LBM continuation was greater in hospice patients residing in skilled nursing (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.20-1.29), non-skilled nursing (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.25-1.32), and assisted living facilities (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.24-1.32). Patients with hospice stays ≥ 180 days were more likely to continue at least one LBM compared to those with stays of 1 week or less (RR 13.11, 95% CI 12.25-14.02).

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of Medicare hospice beneficiaries continued to receive LBMs following hospice enrollment. Providers should evaluate the necessity of continuing non-palliative medications at the end of life through a careful, patient-centric consideration of their potential risks and benefits.

摘要

背景

在注册临终关怀后,应尽量减少使用不能缓解症状或最大限度提高生活质量的药物。

目的

评估癌症和非癌症相关原因导致的临终关怀入院患者在入院后继续使用有限受益药物(LBM)的频率和预测因素。

设计

使用监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险关联数据库的队列研究。

患者

2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日期间,接受并在临终关怀下死亡的 66 岁及以上的 Medicare Part D 参保受益人均纳入本研究(N=70035)。

主要措施

从临终关怀登记开始,对患者进行为期 6 个月的有限受益药物(LBM)的处方配药随访,这些药物是他们在临终关怀入院前 6 个月内使用的,包括降脂药、抗高血压药、口服抗糖尿病药、抗血小板药、抗痴呆药、抗骨质疏松药和质子泵抑制剂。评估患者在临终关怀入院后继续使用 LBM 的比例。对与 LBM 持续相关的因素进行调整相对风险(RR)估计。

主要结果

总体而言,分别有 29.8%和 30.5%的癌症和非癌症相关原因导致的临终关怀入院患者在入院后继续至少一种 LBM。抗痴呆药的使用率最高(29.3%),而抗骨质疏松药的使用率最低(14.1%)。与家庭临终关怀相比,在疗养院(RR 1.25,95%CI 1.20-1.29)、非疗养院(RR 1.29,95%CI 1.25-1.32)和辅助生活设施(RR 1.28,95%CI 1.24-1.32)的临终关怀患者中,LBM 持续使用的可能性更大。与入住时间为 1 周或更短的患者相比,入住时间≥180 天的患者更有可能继续至少使用一种 LBM(RR 13.11,95%CI 12.25-14.02)。

结论

相当一部分 Medicare 临终关怀受益人的临终关怀登记后继续接受 LBM。医生应通过仔细、以患者为中心的方式评估非姑息治疗药物在生命末期的必要性,充分考虑其潜在的风险和获益。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Methodological Challenges for Epidemiologic Studies of Deprescribing at the End of Life.临终减药流行病学研究的方法学挑战
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2021 Sep;8(3):116-129. doi: 10.1007/s40471-021-00264-7. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
7
Medication Use Quality and Safety in Older Adults: 2019 Update.老年人用药质量和安全:2019 更新版。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Feb;69(2):336-341. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17018. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

3
Blood Pressure Trajectories in the 20 Years Before Death.死亡前 20 年的血压轨迹。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):93-99. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7023.
9
Deprescribing in Frail Older People: A Randomised Controlled Trial.老年体弱患者的减药治疗:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 4;11(3):e0149984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149984. eCollection 2016.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验