Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3311-3320. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06778-6. Epub 2021 May 7.
The quality of end-of-life (EOL) care in the USA remains suboptimal, with significant variations in care by race and across disease subgroups. Patient-provider communication may contribute to racial and disease-specific variations in EOL care outcomes.
We examined racial disparities in EOL care, by disease group (cancer vs. non-cancer), and assessed whether racial differences in patient-provider communication accounted for observed disparities.
Retrospective cohort study using the 2001-2015 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results - Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems data linked with Medicare claims (SEER-CAHPS). We employed stratified propensity score matching and modified Poisson regression analyses, adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics PARTICIPANTS: Black and White Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with cancer (N=2000) or without cancer (N=11,524).
End-of-life care measures included hospice use, inpatient hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, and emergency department (ED) visits, during the 90 days prior to death.
When considering all conditions together (cancer + non-cancer), Black beneficiaries were 26% less likely than their Whites counterparts to enroll in hospice (adjusted risk ratio [ARR]: 0.74, 95%CI: 0.66-0.83). Among beneficiaries without cancer, Black beneficiaries had a 32% lower likelihood of enrolling in hospice (ARR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.59-0.79). There was no racial difference in hospice enrollment among cancer patients. Black beneficiaries were also at increased risk for ED use (ARR: 1.12, 95%CI: 1.01-1.26). Patient-provider communication did not explain racial disparities in hospice or ED use. There were no racial differences in hospitalizations or ICU admissions.
We observed racial disparities in hospice use and ED visits in the 90 days prior to death among Medicare beneficiaries; however, hospice disparities were largely driven by patients without cancer. Condition-specific differences in palliative care integration at the end-of-life may partly account for variations in EOL care disparities across disease groups.
美国的临终关怀质量仍然不尽如人意,不同种族之间以及不同疾病亚组之间的护理差异显著。医患沟通可能是导致临终关怀结局在种族和疾病方面存在差异的原因之一。
我们研究了按疾病类型(癌症与非癌症)划分的临终关怀方面的种族差异,并评估了患者与医生沟通方面的种族差异是否导致了观察到的差异。
这是一项使用 2001-2015 年监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估(SEER-CAHPS)数据与医疗保险索赔数据进行链接的回顾性队列研究。我们采用分层倾向评分匹配和修正泊松回归分析,调整了临床和人口统计学特征。
65 岁及以上的黑人和白人医疗保险受益人,患有癌症(N=2000)或无癌症(N=11524)。
在死亡前 90 天内,临终关怀措施包括使用临终关怀、住院、重症监护病房(ICU)入住和急诊部(ED)就诊。
当综合考虑所有疾病时(癌症+非癌症),黑人受益人的临终关怀注册率比白人低 26%(调整后的风险比[ARR]:0.74,95%CI:0.66-0.83)。在没有癌症的受益人群中,黑人受益人的临终关怀注册率低 32%(ARR:0.68,95%CI:0.59-0.79)。癌症患者的临终关怀注册率没有种族差异。黑人受益人的 ED 使用风险也更高(ARR:1.12,95%CI:1.01-1.26)。医患沟通并不能解释临终关怀或 ED 使用方面的种族差异。住院和 ICU 入院方面没有种族差异。
我们观察到医疗保险受益人的临终关怀使用和死亡前 90 天内的 ED 使用存在种族差异;然而,临终关怀方面的差异主要是由没有癌症的患者驱动的。临终关怀阶段姑息治疗整合的具体差异可能部分解释了不同疾病组之间临终关怀差异的原因。