The Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands.
Ghent Univ. Hospital, Belgium.
J Biomed Opt. 2019 Jul;24(7):1-12. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.7.075002.
For the validation of optical diagnostic technologies, experimental results need to be benchmarked against the gold standard. Currently, the gold standard for tissue characterization is assessment of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections by a pathologist. When processing tissue into H&E sections, the shape of the tissue deforms with respect to the initial shape when it was optically measured. We demonstrate the importance of accounting for these tissue deformations when correlating optical measurement with routinely acquired histopathology. We propose a method to register the tissue in the H&E sections to the optical measurements, which corrects for these tissue deformations. We compare the registered H&E sections to H&E sections that were registered with an algorithm that does not account for tissue deformations by evaluating both the shape and the composition of the tissue and using microcomputer tomography data as an independent measure. The proposed method, which did account for tissue deformations, was more accurate than the method that did not account for tissue deformations. These results emphasize the need for a registration method that accounts for tissue deformations, such as the method presented in this study, which can aid in validating optical techniques for clinical use.
为了验证光学诊断技术,实验结果需要与金标准进行基准测试。目前,组织特征的金标准是由病理学家评估苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色切片。在将组织加工成 H&E 切片时,组织相对于初始形状发生变形,而初始形状是在光学测量时获得的。我们证明了在将光学测量与常规获得的组织病理学相关联时,考虑这些组织变形的重要性。我们提出了一种将 H&E 切片中的组织与光学测量进行配准的方法,该方法可纠正这些组织变形。我们通过评估组织的形状和组成并使用微机断层扫描数据作为独立的测量方法,将注册后的 H&E 切片与未考虑组织变形的算法注册后的 H&E 切片进行比较。考虑到组织变形的方法比不考虑组织变形的方法更准确。这些结果强调了需要一种注册方法来考虑组织变形,例如本研究中提出的方法,该方法可以帮助验证用于临床的光学技术。