Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mol Oncol. 2019 Nov;13(11):2361-2374. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12550. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
In metastatic colorectal cancer, RAS and BRAF mutations cause resistance to anti-EGFR therapies, such as cetuximab. Heterogeneity in RAS and BRAF mutations might explain nonresponse in a subset of patients receiving cetuximab. Analyzing mutations in plasma-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could provide a more comprehensive overview of the mutational landscape as compared to analyses of primary and/or metastatic tumor tissue. Therefore, this prospective multicenter study followed 34 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were tissue-tested as RAS wild-type (exons 2-4) during routine work-up and received third-line cetuximab monotherapy. BRAF mutation status was also tested but did not exclude patients from therapy. At baseline and upon disease progression, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was isolated for targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). At 8 weeks, we determined that patients had benefited from treatment. NGS of cfDNA identified three patients with RAS mutations not detected in tumor tissue during routine work-up. Another six patients had a BRAF or rare RAS mutation in ctDNA and/or tumor tissue. Relative to patients without mutations in RAS/BRAF, patients with mutations at baseline had shorter progression-free survival [1.8 versus 4.9 months (P < 0.001)] and overall survival [3.1 versus 9.4 months (P = 0.001)]. In patients with clinical benefit (progressive disease after 8 weeks), ctDNA testing revealed previously undetected mutations in RAS/BRAF (71%) and EGFR (47%), which often emerged polyclonally. Our results indicate that baseline NGS of ctDNA can identify additional RAS mutation carriers, which could improve patient selection for anti-EGFR therapies. Acquired resistance, in patients with initial treatment benefit, is mainly explained by polyclonal emergence of RAS, BRAF, and EGFR mutations in ctDNA.
在转移性结直肠癌中,RAS 和 BRAF 突变导致抗 EGFR 治疗(如西妥昔单抗)耐药。RAS 和 BRAF 突变的异质性可能解释了一部分接受西妥昔单抗治疗的患者无反应的原因。分析血浆衍生循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)中的突变可以比分析原发性和/或转移性肿瘤组织提供更全面的突变景观概述。因此,这项前瞻性多中心研究跟踪了 34 名转移性结直肠癌患者,这些患者在常规工作中被组织检测为 RAS 野生型(外显子 2-4),并接受了三线西妥昔单抗单药治疗。BRAF 突变状态也进行了检测,但并未将患者排除在治疗之外。在基线和疾病进展时,分离无细胞 DNA(cfDNA)进行靶向下一代测序(NGS)。在 8 周时,我们确定患者受益于治疗。cfDNA 的 NGS 鉴定了 3 名在常规工作中未在肿瘤组织中检测到 RAS 突变的患者。另外 6 名患者在 ctDNA 和/或肿瘤组织中存在 BRAF 或罕见 RAS 突变。与基线无 RAS/BRAF 突变的患者相比,基线时有突变的患者无进展生存期更短[1.8 个月与 4.9 个月(P<0.001)]和总生存期[3.1 个月与 9.4 个月(P=0.001)]。在有临床获益的患者(8 周后疾病进展)中,ctDNA 检测显示 RAS/BRAF(71%)和 EGFR(47%)的先前未检测到的突变,这些突变通常呈多克隆出现。我们的结果表明,基线 ctDNA 的 NGS 可以识别出额外的 RAS 突变携带者,这可以改善患者对 EGFR 治疗的选择。初始治疗获益的患者获得性耐药主要归因于 ctDNA 中 RAS、BRAF 和 EGFR 突变的多克隆出现。