• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient information sources when facing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.患者在面对腹主动脉瘤修复时的信息来源。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;71(2):497-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.460. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
2
Factors associated with preference of choice of aortic aneurysm repair in the PReference for Open Versus Endovascular repair of AAA (PROVE-AAA) study.与 PROVE-AAA 研究中腹主动脉瘤修复选择偏好相关的因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;76(6):1556-1564. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.06.018. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
3
Laparoscopic surgery for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复的腹腔镜手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD012302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012302.pub2.
4
Impact of surgeon and hospital experience on outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in New York State.外科医生和医院经验对纽约州腹主动脉瘤修复手术结果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):728-734.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.115. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
5
The Impact of Work Status and Age in Choosing Type of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.工作状态和年龄对腹主动脉瘤修复类型选择的影响
J Surg Res. 2022 Jul;275:149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.12.036. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
6
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: an evidence-based analysis.腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2002;2(1):1-46. Epub 2002 Mar 1.
7
Informed consent for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: assessing variations in surgeon opinion through a national survey.腹主动脉瘤修复的知情同意:通过全国性调查评估外科医生意见的差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Feb;47(2):287-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.050.
8
The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.血管外科学会治疗腹主动脉瘤患者的实践指南。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):2-77.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044.
9
Mortality after endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the elderly.老年患者腹主动脉瘤血管内修复与开放修复后的死亡率
J Surg Res. 2017 Jul;215:153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.03.061. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
10
Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair by a multidisciplinary team: lessons learned and six-year clinical update.多学科团队进行的血管内主动脉瘤修复:经验教训及六年临床进展
Cardiovasc J S Afr. 2005 Jan-Feb;16(1):36-47.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the role of AI chatbots in patient education for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison of ChatGPT and conventional resources.评估人工智能聊天机器人在腹主动脉瘤患者教育中的作用:ChatGPT与传统资源的比较
ANZ J Surg. 2025 Apr;95(4):784-788. doi: 10.1111/ans.70053. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
2
One-year results of an eHealth intervention on anxiety in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: randomized clinical trial.一项针对腹主动脉瘤手术患者焦虑状况的电子健康干预措施的一年期结果:随机临床试验
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae144.
3
Performance of ChatGPT in providing patient information about upper tract urothelial carcinoma.ChatGPT在提供上尿路尿路上皮癌患者信息方面的表现。
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2024;28(2):172-181. doi: 10.5114/wo.2024.141567. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Design of the PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) Trial.腹主动脉瘤开放手术与血管腔内修复术偏好性研究(PROVE - AAA)试验的设计
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 May;65:247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.02.034. Epub 2019 May 8.
2
Improving informed consent in cardiac surgery by enhancing preoperative education.通过加强术前教育来改善心脏外科手术中的知情同意。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Dec;101(12):2047-2053. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
3
What Did You Google? Describing Online Health Information Search Patterns of ED patients and Their Relationship with Final Diagnoses.你在谷歌上搜索了什么?描述急诊患者的在线健康信息搜索模式及其与最终诊断的关系。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;18(5):928-936. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.5.34108. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
4
Use of Online Health Information by Geriatric and Adult Emergency Department Patients: Access, Understanding, and Trust.老年和成年急诊科患者对在线健康信息的使用:获取、理解与信任。
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;24(7):796-802. doi: 10.1111/acem.13207. Epub 2017 May 29.
5
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
6
Variations in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Care: A Report From the International Consortium of Vascular Registries.腹主动脉瘤治疗的差异:来自国际血管注册机构联盟的报告。
Circulation. 2016 Dec 13;134(24):1948-1958. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024870. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
7
Shared Decision Making and Choice for Elective Surgical Care: A Systematic Review.选择性外科护理的共同决策与选择:一项系统综述
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar;154(3):405-20. doi: 10.1177/0194599815620558. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
8
Long-Term Outcomes of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Medicare Population.医疗保险人群腹主动脉瘤的长期转归
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 23;373(4):328-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405778.
9
The Effect of Primary Care Provider Turnover on Patient Experience of Care and Ambulatory Quality of Care.基层医疗服务提供者人员流动对患者就医体验和门诊医疗质量的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1157-62. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1853.
10
Access to care and use of the Internet to search for health information: results from the US National Health Interview Survey.获得医疗服务及使用互联网搜索健康信息:美国国家健康访谈调查结果
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 29;17(4):e106. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4126.

患者在面对腹主动脉瘤修复时的信息来源。

Patient information sources when facing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vt; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.

Department of Surgery and VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vt.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;71(2):497-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.460. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.460
PMID:31353272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10767985/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Shared medical decision making is most important when there are competing options for repair such as in treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We sought to understand the sources of patients' pre-existing knowledge about AAA to better inform treating physicians about patients' needs for preoperative counseling.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter survey of patients facing AAA repair at 20 Veterans Affairs hospitals across the United States as part of the Preferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of AAA study. A validated survey instrument was administered to examine the sources of information available and commonly used by patients to learn about their repair options. The survey was administered by study personnel before the patient had any interaction with the vascular surgeon because survey data were collected before the vascular clinic visit.

RESULTS

Preliminary analysis of data from 99 patients showed that our cohort was primarily male (99%) and elderly (mean age 73 years). Patients commonly had a history of hypertension (86%), prior myocardial infarction (32%), diabetes (32%), and were overweight (58%). Patients arrived at their surgeon's office appointment with limited information. A majority of patients (52%) reported that they had not talked to their primary care physician at all about their options for AAA repair, and one-half (50%) reported that their view of the different surgical options had not been influenced by anyone. Slightly less than one-half of patients reported that they did not receive any information about open surgical aneurysm repair and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (41% and 37%, respectively). Few patients indicated using the internet as their main source of information about open surgical aneurysm repair and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (10% and 11%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients are commonly referred for AAA repair having little to no information regarding AAA pathology or repair options. Fewer than one in five patients searched the internet or had accessed other sources of information on their own. Most vascular surgeons should assume that patients will present to their first vascular surgery appointment with minimal understanding of the treatment options available to them.

摘要

目的

当存在相互竞争的修复方案时,例如在治疗腹主动脉瘤(AAA)时,共享医疗决策最为重要。我们试图了解患者对 AAA 的预先存在的知识来源,以便更好地告知治疗医生患者对术前咨询的需求。

方法

我们在美国 20 家退伍军人事务医院进行了一项多中心调查,调查对象为面临 AAA 修复的患者,该调查是“AAA 开放修复与血管内修复偏好研究”的一部分。我们采用了经过验证的调查工具来检查患者获取其修复方案的信息来源和常用信息来源。在患者与血管外科医生进行任何交流之前,由研究人员对患者进行调查,因为调查数据是在血管科就诊之前收集的。

结果

对 99 例患者数据的初步分析表明,我们的研究对象主要为男性(99%)和老年人(平均年龄 73 岁)。患者普遍有高血压病史(86%)、既往心肌梗死(32%)、糖尿病(32%)和超重(58%)。患者就诊时仅掌握有限的信息。大多数患者(52%)报告说他们根本没有与初级保健医生谈论过 AAA 修复的选择,并且有一半(50%)的患者表示,他们对不同手术方案的看法没有受到任何人的影响。略少于一半的患者报告说他们没有收到任何关于开放手术动脉瘤修复和血管内主动脉瘤修复的信息(分别为 41%和 37%)。很少有患者表示他们没有将互联网作为获取开放手术动脉瘤修复和血管内主动脉瘤修复的主要信息来源(分别为 10%和 11%)。

结论

患者通常被转诊进行 AAA 修复,但对 AAA 病理或修复方案几乎没有了解。不到五分之一的患者会上网搜索或自行获取其他信息来源。大多数血管外科医生应假定患者在首次就诊时对可提供的治疗方案仅有很少或几乎没有了解。