• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依恋取向指导领导判断的转移:文化很重要。

Attachment Orientations Guide the Transfer of Leadership Judgments: Culture Matters.

机构信息

emlyon business school, France.

Maynooth University, Ireland.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;46(4):525-546. doi: 10.1177/0146167219865514. Epub 2019 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1177/0146167219865514
PMID:31354050
Abstract

Two experiments tested the role of global and relationship-specific attachment orientations in leader transference, a social-cognitive process in which mental representations of past leaders are associated with the evaluations of new, similar leaders. Individuals scoring higher on anxious attachment were more likely to hold high just treatment expectations of new leaders who were similar to their previous leaders. Conversely, avoidant individuals evaluated new similar leaders low on just treatment expectations and perceived them as less effective. Relationship-specific attachment orientations predicted transfer of behavioral judgments of just treatment, while global attachment orientations predicted transfer of perceived leader effectiveness. These effects were moderated by culture. In two collectivistic cultures (Greece and India), avoidant individuals demonstrated low just treatment expectations of their new similar leader. In an individualistic culture (United States), avoidant participants showed high behavioral expectations of their new, similar, leader. The results inform emerging views on relational social-cognitive processes in leader-follower interactions.

摘要

两个实验测试了全球和关系特定的依恋取向在领导转移中的作用,领导转移是一种社会认知过程,其中过去领导者的心理表征与对新的、相似的领导者的评价相关联。在焦虑依恋得分较高的个体中,他们更有可能对与前任领导者相似的新领导者持有高度的公正待遇期望。相反,回避型个体对新的相似领导者的公正待遇期望较低,并认为他们的效率较低。关系特定的依恋取向预测公正待遇行为判断的转移,而全球依恋取向预测感知到的领导者有效性的转移。这些影响受到文化的调节。在两个集体主义文化(希腊和印度)中,回避型个体对他们新的相似领导者的公正待遇期望较低。在个人主义文化(美国)中,回避型参与者对他们新的、相似的领导者表现出高度的行为期望。研究结果为领导-下属互动中的关系社会认知过程的新兴观点提供了信息。

相似文献

1
Attachment Orientations Guide the Transfer of Leadership Judgments: Culture Matters.依恋取向指导领导判断的转移:文化很重要。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;46(4):525-546. doi: 10.1177/0146167219865514. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
2
The influence of leadership style on subordinates' attachment to the leader.领导风格对下属对领导者的依恋的影响。
Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E62. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.67.
3
From Ideal to Real: Attachment Orientations Guide Preference for an Autonomous Leadership Style.从理想到现实:依恋取向指导对自主领导风格的偏好。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 21;13:728343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.728343. eCollection 2022.
4
The impact of previous leaders on the evaluation of new leaders: an alternative to prototype matching.前任领导者对新领导者评价的影响:原型匹配的一种替代方式。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1683-95. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1683.
5
Attachment and leadership: review and new insights.依附关系与领导力:回顾与新见解。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Feb;25:157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
6
Leaders as attachment figures: leaders' attachment orientations predict leadership-related mental representations and followers' performance and mental health.作为依恋对象的领导者:领导者的依恋取向预测与领导相关的心理表征、追随者的绩效和心理健康。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Oct;93(4):632-50. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.632.
7
How to avoid others and influence people: Attachment orientations predict leader prototypicality in ad hoc teams.如何避免他人影响:临时性团队中依恋取向预测领导者典型性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Oct;230:103742. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103742. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
8
Reliance on leaders and social institutions: an attachment perspective.对领导者和社会机构的依赖:一种依恋视角。
Attach Hum Dev. 2007 Mar;9(1):73-93. doi: 10.1080/14616730601151466.
9
Ostracism and attachment orientation: Avoidants are less affected in both individualistic and collectivistic cultures.排斥与依恋取向:在个人主义和集体主义文化中,回避型个体受影响较小。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2016 Mar;55(1):162-81. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12122. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
10
Calibrating Use of Emotion Regulation Strategies to the Relationship Context: An Attachment Perspective.根据依恋视角校准情绪调节策略在关系情境中的运用
J Pers. 2016 Jun;84(3):369-80. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12165. Epub 2015 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the global attachment model: domain- and relationship-specific attachment models at work and their functions.超越全球依恋模型:工作场所中特定领域和特定关系的依恋模型及其功能。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 18;14:1158992. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1158992. eCollection 2023.
2
Time After Time: Attachment Orientations and Impression Formation in Initial and Longer-Term Team Interactions.一次又一次:初始及长期团队互动中的依恋取向与印象形成
Front Psychol. 2022 May 30;13:882162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882162. eCollection 2022.
3
Don't Go Chasing Narcissists: A Relational-Based and Multiverse Perspective on Leader Narcissism and Follower Engagement Using a Machine Learning Approach.
勿追自恋者:基于关系和多宇宙视角的领导自恋与追随者投入的机器学习研究
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jul;49(7):1130-1147. doi: 10.1177/01461672221094976. Epub 2022 May 27.
4
From Ideal to Real: Attachment Orientations Guide Preference for an Autonomous Leadership Style.从理想到现实:依恋取向指导对自主领导风格的偏好。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 21;13:728343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.728343. eCollection 2022.
5
Don't you tweet me badly: Anxiety contagion between leaders and followers in computer-mediated communication during COVID-19.不要在推特上给我发不好的内容:新冠疫情期间计算机中介交流中领导与下属间的焦虑传染。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 4;17(3):e0264444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264444. eCollection 2022.
6
I Need a Doctor, Call Me a Doctor: Attachment and the Evaluation of General Practitioners before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.我需要医生,叫医生来:COVID-19 大流行前后全科医生的依恋和评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 26;18(15):7914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157914.
7
Highly Recommended? How Relation-Specific Attachment Styles Bias Customers Willingness to Recommend.强烈推荐?关系特定的依恋风格如何影响顾客的推荐意愿。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 10;11:1311. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01311. eCollection 2020.