• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从理想到现实:依恋取向指导对自主领导风格的偏好。

From Ideal to Real: Attachment Orientations Guide Preference for an Autonomous Leadership Style.

作者信息

Gruda Dritjon, Kafetsios Konstantinos

机构信息

School of Business, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.

Palacky University, Olomouc, Czechia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 21;13:728343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.728343. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.728343
PMID:35264995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8899504/
Abstract

Autonomy is a key characteristic of attachment relations that varies as a function of attachment orientations and is also a key personality characteristic of leadership perceptions. In the presented research, we reasoned that the relationship between attachment and autonomy-related preference for specific leaders and leadership behavior would be a function of individuals' insecure attachment strategies. We tested our hypotheses in two studies. Study 1 used Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) modeling to test expectations based on a cross-sectional design, while Study 2 utilized a vignette-based experimental design. We find that anxious individuals attributed less positive evaluations to an autonomous leadership style (Study 1), while avoidant persons attributed higher leader competence to an autonomous leader description (Study 2). Compared to less anxious participants, highly anxious participants attributed lower competence to the autonomous leader description. By examining how individual differences in attachment orientations can indirectly influence the ideal leader categorization process, the present set of studies lends support to the importance of attachment orientations and related working models in leader perception and contribute to the literature on leader-follower fit. Using a survey and experimental approach, we examine how followers' attachment schemas can shape the leader influence process, specifically concerning a preference for an autonomous leadership style.

摘要

自主性是依恋关系的一个关键特征,它会随着依恋取向的变化而变化,同时也是领导力认知的一个关键人格特征。在本研究中,我们推断,依恋与对特定领导者和领导行为的自主性相关偏好之间的关系将是个体不安全依恋策略的函数。我们在两项研究中检验了我们的假设。研究1使用多指标多原因(MIMIC)模型,基于横断面设计来检验预期,而研究2采用基于 vignette 的实验设计。我们发现,焦虑个体对自主领导风格的积极评价较低(研究1),而回避型个体将更高的领导者能力归因于自主领导者描述(研究2)。与焦虑程度较低的参与者相比,高度焦虑的参与者将自主领导者描述的能力归因得更低。通过研究依恋取向的个体差异如何间接影响理想领导者的分类过程,本系列研究支持了依恋取向和相关工作模型在领导者认知中的重要性,并为领导 - 下属匹配的文献做出了贡献。我们使用调查和实验方法,研究追随者的依恋模式如何塑造领导者影响过程,特别是关于对自主领导风格的偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0521/8899504/85ca562de10f/fpsyg-13-728343-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0521/8899504/d33ead9148c6/fpsyg-13-728343-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0521/8899504/85ca562de10f/fpsyg-13-728343-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0521/8899504/d33ead9148c6/fpsyg-13-728343-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0521/8899504/85ca562de10f/fpsyg-13-728343-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
From Ideal to Real: Attachment Orientations Guide Preference for an Autonomous Leadership Style.从理想到现实:依恋取向指导对自主领导风格的偏好。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 21;13:728343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.728343. eCollection 2022.
2
Attachment Orientations Guide the Transfer of Leadership Judgments: Culture Matters.依恋取向指导领导判断的转移:文化很重要。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;46(4):525-546. doi: 10.1177/0146167219865514. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
3
Attachment and leadership: review and new insights.依附关系与领导力:回顾与新见解。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Feb;25:157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
4
How to avoid others and influence people: Attachment orientations predict leader prototypicality in ad hoc teams.如何避免他人影响:临时性团队中依恋取向预测领导者典型性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Oct;230:103742. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103742. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
5
The influence of leader-follower cognitive style congruence on organizational citizenship behaviors and the mediating role of trust.领导-下属认知风格一致性对组织公民行为的影响及信任的中介作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Aug;238:103964. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103964. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
The influence of leadership style on subordinates' attachment to the leader.领导风格对下属对领导者的依恋的影响。
Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E62. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.67.
7
Integrating Implicit Leadership Theories, Leader-Member Exchange, Self-Efficacy, and Attachment Theory to Predict Job Performance.整合内隐领导理论、领导-成员交换理论、自我效能感和依恋理论以预测工作绩效。
Psychol Rep. 2019 Jun;122(3):1117-1144. doi: 10.1177/0033294118773400. Epub 2018 May 15.
8
Meta-analytic and primary investigations of the role of followers in ratings of leadership behavior in organizations.元分析和初步研究组织中领导行为评价中追随者的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jan;104(1):70-106. doi: 10.1037/apl0000345. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
9
How and When Does Visionary Leadership Promote Followers' Taking Charge? The Roles of Inclusion of Leader in Self and Future Orientation.有远见的领导力如何以及何时促进追随者主动负责?领导者自我包容和未来导向的作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Jul 28;15:1917-1929. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S366939. eCollection 2022.
10
Mindfulness and Leadership: Communication as a Behavioral Correlate of Leader Mindfulness and Its Effect on Follower Satisfaction.正念与领导力:沟通作为领导者正念的行为关联及其对追随者满意度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 29;10:667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00667. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Time After Time: Attachment Orientations and Impression Formation in Initial and Longer-Term Team Interactions.一次又一次:初始及长期团队互动中的依恋取向与印象形成
Front Psychol. 2022 May 30;13:882162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882162. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
I Need a Doctor, Call Me a Doctor: Attachment and the Evaluation of General Practitioners before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.我需要医生,叫医生来:COVID-19 大流行前后全科医生的依恋和评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 26;18(15):7914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157914.
2
Attachment Orientations Guide the Transfer of Leadership Judgments: Culture Matters.依恋取向指导领导判断的转移:文化很重要。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;46(4):525-546. doi: 10.1177/0146167219865514. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
3
Probing Interactions in Fixed and Multilevel Regression: Inferential and Graphical Techniques.
探究固定效应和多层回归中的交互作用:推断和图形技术。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2005;40(3):373-400. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4003_5.
4
Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations.成人依恋风格是分类的还是维度的?一般和关系特定依恋取向的分类分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Aug;109(2):354-68. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000027. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
5
Attachment at (not to) work: applying attachment theory to explain individual behavior in organizations.工作中的依附(而非不依附):运用依附理论解释组织中的个体行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jan;96(1):169-82. doi: 10.1037/a0020372.
6
Illustration of MIMIC-Model DIF Testing with the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality.使用非适应性和适应性人格量表对MIMIC模型差异项目功能测试的说明。
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2009;31(4):320-330. doi: 10.1007/s10862-008-9118-9.
7
Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: evidence from experimental and observational studies.依恋的工作模式塑造了社会支持的认知:来自实验和观察研究的证据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Sep;87(3):363-83. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.363.
8
Attachment theory and group processes: the association between attachment style and group-related representations, goals, memories, and functioning.依恋理论与群体过程:依恋风格与群体相关表征、目标、记忆及功能之间的关联。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jun;84(6):1220-35. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1220.
9
Prediction of peer-rated adult hostility from autonomy struggles in adolescent-family interactions.从青少年与家庭互动中的自主性冲突预测同伴评定的成人敌意。
Dev Psychopathol. 2002 Winter;14(1):123-37. doi: 10.1017/s0954579402001074.
10
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.结构模型中的比较拟合指数。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.