• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一次又一次:初始及长期团队互动中的依恋取向与印象形成

Time After Time: Attachment Orientations and Impression Formation in Initial and Longer-Term Team Interactions.

作者信息

Gruda Dritjon, Berrios Raul Antonio, Kafetsios Konstantinos G, McCleskey Jim Allen

机构信息

School of Business, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.

Facultad de Administración y Economía, Universidad de Santiago, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 May 30;13:882162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882162. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882162
PMID:35707646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9190780/
Abstract

If securely attached individuals typically exhibit more desirable attributes, can insecure individuals be perceived positively when working in teams despite their interpersonal disadvantages? In an exploratory study, using both a vignette based experimental research design ( = 636) and a round-robin study of professionals working on a team task for nine consecutive weeks ( = 648), we examined the evolving impressions of insecurely attached individuals over time. We find that while anxiously attached individuals are perceived more positively in initial interactions, this initial positive effect for anxious attachment disappeared over time as individuals within teams gained more relational knowledge about their team members. We also found a stable and negative effect of avoidant attachment. We discuss possible reasons for the temporal underpinnings of this effect and compare our findings to previous literature.

摘要

如果安全型依恋的个体通常表现出更理想的特质,那么不安全型个体尽管存在人际劣势,但在团队合作时会被给予积极评价吗?在一项探索性研究中,我们采用基于 vignette 的实验研究设计(n = 636)以及对连续九周从事团队任务的专业人员进行的循环赛研究(n = 648),考察了不安全型依恋个体的印象随时间的变化。我们发现,虽然焦虑型依恋个体在初始互动中被给予更积极的评价,但随着团队成员对彼此有了更多关系方面的了解,焦虑型依恋的这种初始积极效应会随时间消失。我们还发现了回避型依恋的稳定负面效应。我们讨论了这种效应的时间基础的可能原因,并将我们的研究结果与以往文献进行了比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/092d/9190780/fc7f3f47edbc/fpsyg-13-882162-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/092d/9190780/fc7f3f47edbc/fpsyg-13-882162-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/092d/9190780/fc7f3f47edbc/fpsyg-13-882162-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Time After Time: Attachment Orientations and Impression Formation in Initial and Longer-Term Team Interactions.一次又一次:初始及长期团队互动中的依恋取向与印象形成
Front Psychol. 2022 May 30;13:882162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882162. eCollection 2022.
2
How to avoid others and influence people: Attachment orientations predict leader prototypicality in ad hoc teams.如何避免他人影响:临时性团队中依恋取向预测领导者典型性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Oct;230:103742. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103742. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
3
The Attachment Paradox: How Can So Many of Us (the Insecure Ones) Have No Adaptive Advantages?依附悖论:为什么我们这么多人(不自信的人)没有适应优势?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;5(2):123-41. doi: 10.1177/1745691610362349.
4
Not "capitalizing" on social capitalization interactions: the role of attachment insecurity.未能充分利用社交资本互动:依恋不安全感的作用。
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Feb;25(1):77-85. doi: 10.1037/a0021876.
5
Attachment style and individual differences in leadership perceptions and emergence.
J Soc Psychol. 2006 Apr;146(2):165-82. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.146.2.165-182.
6
Attention focus and self-touch in toddlers: The moderating effect of attachment security.幼儿的注意力聚焦与自我触摸:依恋安全性的调节作用。
Infant Behav Dev. 2017 Aug;48(Pt B):114-123. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
7
Facing danger: how do people behave in times of need? The case of adult attachment styles.直面危险:人们在危难时刻如何表现?成人依恋模式的案例研究。
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 10;5:1452. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01452. eCollection 2014.
8
Too Insecure to Be a Leader: The Role of Attachment in Leadership Emergence.因过于缺乏安全感而无法成为领导者:依恋关系在领导力形成中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 17;11:571401. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571401. eCollection 2020.
9
[Attachment security and quality of life in atopic dermatitis].[特应性皮炎中的依恋安全性与生活质量]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2004 Aug;54(8):330-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828302.
10
Neuroscience of human social interactions and adult attachment style.人类社会互动与成人依恋风格的神经科学
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 17;6:212. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00212. eCollection 2012.

本文引用的文献

1
From Ideal to Real: Attachment Orientations Guide Preference for an Autonomous Leadership Style.从理想到现实:依恋取向指导对自主领导风格的偏好。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 21;13:728343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.728343. eCollection 2022.
2
Don't you tweet me badly: Anxiety contagion between leaders and followers in computer-mediated communication during COVID-19.不要在推特上给我发不好的内容:新冠疫情期间计算机中介交流中领导与下属间的焦虑传染。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 4;17(3):e0264444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264444. eCollection 2022.
3
All about that trait: Examining extraversion and state anxiety during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic using a machine learning approach.
关于那个特质:使用机器学习方法研究新冠疫情期间的外向性和状态焦虑。
Pers Individ Dif. 2022 Apr;188:111461. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111461. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
4
I Need a Doctor, Call Me a Doctor: Attachment and the Evaluation of General Practitioners before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.我需要医生,叫医生来:COVID-19 大流行前后全科医生的依恋和评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 26;18(15):7914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157914.
5
The security-seeking impulse and the unification of attachment and culture.寻求安全感的冲动与依恋和文化的统一。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Oct;127(5):778-791. doi: 10.1037/rev0000194. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
6
Attachment Orientations Guide the Transfer of Leadership Judgments: Culture Matters.依恋取向指导领导判断的转移:文化很重要。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;46(4):525-546. doi: 10.1177/0146167219865514. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
7
Attachment and leadership: review and new insights.依附关系与领导力:回顾与新见解。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Feb;25:157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
8
Tackling Longitudinal Round-Robin Data: A Social Relations Growth Model.解决纵向轮次数据问题:社会关系增长模型。
Psychometrika. 2017 Dec;82(4):1162-1181. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9546-5. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
9
Processing Information about Support Exchanges in Close Relationships: The Role of a Knowledge Structure.处理亲密关系中支持性交流的信息:知识结构的作用。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 29;7:259. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00259. eCollection 2016.
10
Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations.成人依恋风格是分类的还是维度的?一般和关系特定依恋取向的分类分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Aug;109(2):354-68. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000027. Epub 2015 Jan 5.