• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与严重尿路感染风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for Severe Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (C.V.D., S.S., D.K., M.F., A.T., E.P.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 20;171(4):248-256. doi: 10.7326/M18-3136. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

DOI:10.7326/M18-3136
PMID:31357213
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6989379/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior studies evaluating risk for severe urinary tract infections (UTIs) with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have reported conflicting findings.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether patients initiating use of SGLT-2 inhibitors were at increased risk for severe UTI events compared with those initiating use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1) agonists.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING

2 large, U.S.-based databases of commercial claims (March 2013 to September 2015).

PARTICIPANTS

Within each database, 2 cohorts were created and matched 1:1 on propensity score. Patients were aged 18 years or older, had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and were initiating use of SGLT-2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors (cohort 1) or GLP-1 agonists (cohort 2).

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was a severe UTI event, defined as a hospitalization for primary UTI, sepsis with UTI, or pyelonephritis; the secondary outcome was outpatient UTI treated with antibiotics. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated in each propensity score-matched cohort, with adjustment for more than 90 baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

After 1:1 matching on propensity score, 123 752 patients were identified in cohort 1 and 111 978 in cohort 2 in the 2 databases. In cohort 1, persons newly receiving SGLT-2 inhibitors had 61 severe UTI events (incidence rate [IR] per 1000 person-years, 1.76), compared with 57 events in the DPP-4 inhibitor group (IR, 1.77) (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.41]). In cohort 2, those receiving SGLT-2 inhibitors had 73 events (IR, 2.15), compared with 87 events in the GLP-1 agonist group (IR, 2.96) (HR, 0.72 [CI, 0.53 to 0.99]). Findings were robust across sensitivity analyses; within several subgroups of age, sex, and frailty; and for canagliflozin and dapagliflozin individually. In addition, SGLT-2 inhibitors were not associated with increased risk for outpatient UTIs (cohort 1: HR, 0.96 [CI, 0.89 to 1.04]; cohort 2: HR, 0.91 [CI, 0.84 to 0.99]).

LIMITATION

Generalizability of the study findings may be limited to patients with commercial insurance.

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort of patients seen in routine clinical practice, risk for severe and nonsevere UTI events among those initiating SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy was similar to that among patients initiating treatment with other second-line antidiabetic medications.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics.

摘要

背景

先前评估钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2(SGLT-2)抑制剂治疗严重尿路感染(UTI)风险的研究结果存在矛盾。

目的

评估与起始使用二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂或胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体(GLP-1)激动剂相比,起始使用 SGLT-2 抑制剂的患者发生严重 UTI 事件的风险是否增加。

设计

基于人群的队列研究。

设置

2 个美国大型商业索赔数据库(2013 年 3 月至 2015 年 9 月)。

参与者

在每个数据库中,创建了 2 个队列,并按倾向评分进行 1:1 匹配。患者年龄≥18 岁,患有 2 型糖尿病,起始使用 SGLT-2 抑制剂与 DPP-4 抑制剂(队列 1)或 GLP-1 激动剂(队列 2)。

测量

主要结局是严重 UTI 事件,定义为因原发性 UTI、UTI 合并败血症或肾盂肾炎住院治疗;次要结局是门诊使用抗生素治疗的 UTI。在每个倾向评分匹配的队列中,使用调整了 90 多项基线特征的风险比(HR)进行估计。

结果

在 2 个数据库中,1:1 倾向评分匹配后,队列 1 中确定了 123752 例患者,队列 2 中确定了 111978 例患者。在队列 1 中,新接受 SGLT-2 抑制剂治疗的患者发生 61 例严重 UTI 事件(发病率[IR]为每 1000 人年 1.76),而 DPP-4 抑制剂组为 57 例事件(IR,1.77)(HR,0.98[95%CI,0.68 至 1.41])。在队列 2 中,接受 SGLT-2 抑制剂治疗的患者发生 73 例事件(IR,2.15),而 GLP-1 激动剂组为 87 例事件(IR,2.96)(HR,0.72[CI,0.53 至 0.99])。敏感性分析结果稳健;在年龄、性别和脆弱性等多个亚组中;对于坎格列净和达格列净分别进行分析。此外,SGLT-2 抑制剂与门诊 UTI 风险增加无关(队列 1:HR,0.96[CI,0.89 至 1.04];队列 2:HR,0.91[CI,0.84 至 0.99])。

局限性

研究结果的推广性可能仅限于有商业保险的患者。

结论

在常规临床实践中观察到的大型患者队列中,起始 SGLT-2 抑制剂治疗的患者与起始使用其他二线抗糖尿病药物治疗的患者发生严重和非严重 UTI 事件的风险相似。

主要资金来源

布莱根妇女医院,药物流行病学和药物经济学部。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3344/6989379/2c0883338432/nihms-1046584-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3344/6989379/2c0883338432/nihms-1046584-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3344/6989379/2c0883338432/nihms-1046584-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for Severe Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Cohort Study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与严重尿路感染风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 20;171(4):248-256. doi: 10.7326/M18-3136. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and DPP-4 inhibitors and risk of hyperkalemia among people with type 2 diabetes in clinical practice: population based cohort study.在临床实践中,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂与 2 型糖尿病患者高钾血症风险的关系:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2024 Jun 26;385:e078483. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078483.
3
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Urinary Tract Infections: A Propensity Score-matched Population-based Cohort Study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与尿路感染:基于倾向评分匹配的人群队列研究。
Can J Diabetes. 2022 Jun;46(4):392-403.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
4
A population-based cohort defined risk of hyperkalemia after initiating SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP1 receptor agonists or DPP-4 inhibitors to patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.一项基于人群的队列研究确定了慢性肾脏病合并2型糖尿病患者开始使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT-2)抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽1(GLP1)受体激动剂或二肽基肽酶4(DPP-4)抑制剂后发生高钾血症的风险。
Kidney Int. 2024 Mar;105(3):618-628. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.11.025. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
5
Fracture Risk After Initiation of Use of Canagliflozin: A Cohort Study.使用卡格列净后骨折风险:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Feb 5;170(3):155-163. doi: 10.7326/M18-0567. Epub 2019 Jan 1.
6
Concomitant Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Overactive Bladder Drugs and the Risk of Urinary Tract Infection.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与膀胱过度活动症药物联合使用与尿路感染风险。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 May;115(5):1132-1140. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3182. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
7
Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Initiating First-Line Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes With Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Versus Metformin : A Cohort Study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二甲双胍作为二线治疗药物起始治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管结局:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jul;175(7):927-937. doi: 10.7326/M21-4012. Epub 2022 May 24.
8
Risk of genital and urinary tract infections associated with SGLT-2 inhibitors as an add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A retrospective cohort study in Korea.在韩国,对 2 型糖尿病患者采用 SGLT-2 抑制剂作为二甲双胍的附加治疗与生殖和泌尿道感染风险的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2022 Feb;10(1):e00910. doi: 10.1002/prp2.910.
9
Association Between Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Lower Extremity Amputation Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病患者中钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与下肢截肢之间的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1190-1198. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3034.
10
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for Diabetic Ketoacidosis : A Multicenter Cohort Study.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与糖尿病酮症酸中毒风险:一项多中心队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 15;173(6):417-425. doi: 10.7326/M20-0289. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
[Frailty and pharmacotherapy].[衰弱与药物治疗]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s00108-025-01980-8.
2
Impact of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Post-Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Infection and Prognosis.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂对膀胱肿瘤经尿道切除术后感染及预后的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 20;15(14):1824. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15141824.
3
Risk factors of urinary tract infections with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in heart failure.心力衰竭患者使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂发生尿路感染的危险因素。

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative risk of genital infections associated with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂相关生殖器感染的比较风险。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Feb;21(2):434-438. doi: 10.1111/dom.13531. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
2
Validation of a Claims-Based Frailty Index Against Physical Performance and Adverse Health Outcomes in the Health and Retirement Study.基于索赔的衰弱指数对健康与退休研究中身体表现和不良健康结果的验证。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Jul 12;74(8):1271-1276. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly197.
3
SGLT-2 inhibitors and the risk of infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 11;104(28):e43245. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043245.
4
The Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Patients with Anticancer Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂用于抗癌治疗患者的疗效与安全性:队列研究的荟萃分析
Glob Heart. 2025 Jun 16;20(1):53. doi: 10.5334/gh.1440. eCollection 2025.
5
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter Inhibition in Acute Heart Failure: An In-Depth Review.急性心力衰竭中钠葡萄糖协同转运蛋白抑制作用:深入综述
CJC Open. 2024 Dec 27;7(4):380-389. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.12.008. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients with Urogenital Malformations and Urinary Diversions: Risks, Benefits, and Clinical Considerations.患有泌尿生殖系统畸形和尿路改道患者使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂:风险、益处及临床考量
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 20;61(5):921. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050921.
7
Continuous-Time Causal Inference With Marked Point Process Weights: An Example on Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporters 2 Inhibitor Medications and Urinary Tract Infection.具有标记点过程权重的连续时间因果推断:以钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂药物与尿路感染为例
Stat Med. 2025 May;44(10-12):e70102. doi: 10.1002/sim.70102.
8
Risk of Urinary Tract Infections with Sodium-Glucose Transport Protein-2 Inhibitors in Subpopulations with Abnormal Genitourinary Pathology.患有泌尿生殖系统病理异常亚群中使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂发生尿路感染的风险
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 Apr 11;20(6):820-828. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000687.
9
Efficacy and safety of 11 sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors at different dosages in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients inadequately controlled with metformin: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.11种不同剂量钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂用于二甲双胍控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 26;15(2):e088687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088687.
10
Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) for pediatric kidney disease: the future is near.用于儿科肾脏疾病的钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i):未来已近在咫尺。
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jan 30;13:1521425. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1521425. eCollection 2025.
SGLT-2 抑制剂与感染风险:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2018 May;55(5):503-514. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1116-0. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
4
Cardiovascular outcomes associated with canagliflozin versus other non-gliflozin antidiabetic drugs: population based cohort study.卡格列净与其他非格列净类抗糖尿病药物相关的心血管结局:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2018 Feb 6;360:k119. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k119.
5
Measuring Frailty in Medicare Data: Development and Validation of a Claims-Based Frailty Index.在 Medicare 数据中测量虚弱程度:基于索赔的虚弱指数的开发和验证。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Jun 14;73(7):980-987. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx229.
6
Claims-based studies of oral glucose-lowering medications can achieve balance in critical clinical variables only observed in electronic health records.基于索赔的口服降血糖药物研究仅能在电子健康记录中观察到关键临床变量的平衡。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Apr;20(4):974-984. doi: 10.1111/dom.13184. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
7
Use of SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes and risk of infection: Analysis using general practice records from the NPS MedicineWise MedicineInsight program.使用 SGLT2 抑制剂治疗糖尿病和感染风险:来自 NPS MedicineWise MedicineInsight 计划的全科医生记录分析。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;130:180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
8
Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes.卡格列净与 2 型糖尿病的心血管和肾脏事件。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):644-657. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
9
Lower Risk of Heart Failure and Death in Patients Initiated on Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Versus Other Glucose-Lowering Drugs: The CVD-REAL Study (Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiovascular Outcomes in New Users of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors).与其他降糖药物相比,起始使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂的患者发生心力衰竭和死亡的风险更低:CVD-REAL研究(钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂新使用者心血管结局的比较有效性)
Circulation. 2017 Jul 18;136(3):249-259. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029190. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
A Propensity-score-based Fine Stratification Approach for Confounding Adjustment When Exposure Is Infrequent.一种基于倾向评分的精细分层方法,用于在暴露不频繁时进行混杂因素调整。
Epidemiology. 2017 Mar;28(2):249-257. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000595.