• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人际沟通中人际关系同步行为估计的转移熵:识别领导者或追随者。

Transfer entropy for synchronized behavior estimation of interpersonal relationships in human communication: identifying leaders or followers.

机构信息

Department of Intelligent Interaction Technology, Graduate School of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, 305-8573, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 29;9(1):10960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47525-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-47525-6
PMID:31358871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6662890/
Abstract

A person's behavioral rhythms are synchronized spontaneously and unconsciously with those of other people, which often have positive effects, such as facilitating cooperation on tasks and promoting empathy for others. Although synchronization is induced by mutual interaction, it is unclear whether both individuals have the same influence. Is there a division of roles, in which some people are leaders and some followers? To address this, we calculated the transfer entropy (TE) of behavioral rhythms in a two-person cooperative tapping task, which provides an estimate of the direction of information propagation between two systems. We used TE to identify the causal relationship between two people (leader and follower); that is, the significant differences in the TE from one partner to another and vice versa. In this study, if there was a high TE from one individual (e.g., participant A) to the other individual (e.g., participant B), we defined participant A as the leader group and B as the follower group. First, using computer simulations, the programs which tapping intervals were almost independent with or were almost same with those of the partner programs were identified as the leader or follower, respectively, thereby confirming our hypothesis. Second, based on the results of the human experiment, we identified the leader and follower in some groups. Interestingly, the leader group showed a high systemizing quotient, which is related to communication deficits in developmental disorders such as autism. The results are consistent with participants' subjective impressions of their partners. Our methods can be used to estimate the interpersonal division of roles in complex human communications.

摘要

人的行为节律会自发且无意识地与他人同步,这通常会产生积极的影响,例如促进任务合作和增进对他人的同理心。尽管同步是通过相互作用引起的,但尚不清楚两个人是否具有相同的影响力。是否存在角色分工,有些人是领导者,有些人是追随者?为了解决这个问题,我们在两人合作敲击任务中计算了行为节律的转移熵(TE),这提供了两个系统之间信息传播方向的估计。我们使用 TE 来识别两个人之间的因果关系(领导者和追随者);也就是说,从一个伙伴到另一个伙伴的 TE 存在显著差异,反之亦然。在这项研究中,如果一个人(例如参与者 A)到另一个人(例如参与者 B)的 TE 很高,我们将参与者 A 定义为领导者群体,B 定义为追随者群体。首先,通过计算机模拟,我们确定了敲击间隔几乎与伙伴程序独立或几乎相同的程序分别为领导者或追随者,从而验证了我们的假设。其次,基于人类实验的结果,我们确定了一些组中的领导者和追随者。有趣的是,领导者群体表现出较高的系统化商数,这与自闭症等发育障碍中的沟通缺陷有关。结果与参与者对其伙伴的主观印象一致。我们的方法可用于估计复杂人际交流中的角色分工。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c88a/6662890/e5fb60976865/41598_2019_47525_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c88a/6662890/c9dbb1f2ba24/41598_2019_47525_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c88a/6662890/05bb4c101a00/41598_2019_47525_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c88a/6662890/e5fb60976865/41598_2019_47525_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c88a/6662890/c9dbb1f2ba24/41598_2019_47525_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c88a/6662890/05bb4c101a00/41598_2019_47525_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c88a/6662890/e5fb60976865/41598_2019_47525_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Transfer entropy for synchronized behavior estimation of interpersonal relationships in human communication: identifying leaders or followers.人际沟通中人际关系同步行为估计的转移熵:识别领导者或追随者。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 29;9(1):10960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47525-6.
2
The physiological basis of leader-follower roles in the dyadic alternating tapping task.二元交替敲击任务中领导者-跟随者角色的生理基础。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 30;14:1232016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232016. eCollection 2023.
3
Cross-feedback with Partner Contributes to Performance Accuracy in Finger-tapping Rhythm Synchronization between One Leader and Two Followers.领导者与两位跟随者之间手指轻敲节奏同步的交叉反馈有助于提高表现准确性。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 24;9(1):7800. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43352-x.
4
Leading the follower: an fMRI investigation of dynamic cooperativity and leader-follower strategies in synchronization with an adaptive virtual partner.引导跟随者:功能磁共振成像研究自适应虚拟伙伴同步中的动态协同作用和领导-跟随策略。
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:688-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.027. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
5
Mindfulness and Leadership: Communication as a Behavioral Correlate of Leader Mindfulness and Its Effect on Follower Satisfaction.正念与领导力:沟通作为领导者正念的行为关联及其对追随者满意度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 29;10:667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00667. eCollection 2019.
6
Letting leaders spontaneously emerge yields better creative outcomes and higher leader-follower interbrain synchrony during creative group communication.让领导者自然涌现会产生更好的创意成果,并在创意团队沟通中提高领导者-追随者的大脑同步性。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 May 24;33(11):6559-6572. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac524.
7
Plasticity in leader-follower roles in human teams.人类团队中领导者-追随者角色的可塑性。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 6;7(1):14562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14851-6.
8
Leader emergence through interpersonal neural synchronization.通过人际神经同步实现领导者的出现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 7;112(14):4274-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422930112. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
9
Meta-analytic and primary investigations of the role of followers in ratings of leadership behavior in organizations.元分析和初步研究组织中领导行为评价中追随者的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jan;104(1):70-106. doi: 10.1037/apl0000345. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
Perceived interpersonal synchrony increases empathy: Insights from autism spectrum disorder.感知到的人际同步性会增强同理心:来自自闭症谱系障碍的见解。
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting existence of a hidden mediator between a pair of individual time series.检测一对个体时间序列之间隐藏中介变量的存在。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21610. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04436-z.
2
The physiological basis of leader-follower roles in the dyadic alternating tapping task.二元交替敲击任务中领导者-跟随者角色的生理基础。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 30;14:1232016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232016. eCollection 2023.
3
(Mis)align: a simple dynamic framework for modeling interpersonal coordination.(误)对齐:一个用于建模人际协调的简单动态框架。

本文引用的文献

1
The Relationship Between Head Motion Synchronization and Empathy in Unidirectional Face-to-Face Communication.单向面对面交流中头部运动同步与共情之间的关系
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 25;9:1622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01622. eCollection 2018.
2
Sensory-motor synchronization in the brain corresponds to behavioral synchronization between individuals.大脑中的感觉-运动同步对应于个体之间的行为同步。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Oct;119:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.026. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
3
Frontal theta activation during motor synchronization in autism.
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 26;13(1):18325. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41516-4.
4
Students' Learning Behaviour in Programming Education Analysis: Insights from Entropy and Community Detection.编程教育分析中学生的学习行为:来自熵和社区检测的见解
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Aug 17;25(8):1225. doi: 10.3390/e25081225.
5
Tuning in to real-time social interactions in macaques.关注猕猴的实时社交互动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 6;120(23):e2301614120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301614120. Epub 2023 May 30.
6
Head motion synchrony in unidirectional and bidirectional verbal communication.单向和双向言语交流中的头部运动同步。
PLoS One. 2023 May 24;18(5):e0286098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286098. eCollection 2023.
7
Modes of information flow in collective cohesion.集体凝聚力中的信息流模式。
Sci Adv. 2022 Feb 11;8(6):eabj1720. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj1720. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
8
Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony for Detecting Moments of Connection in Persons With Dementia: A Pilot Study.用于检测痴呆症患者情感连接时刻的人际生理同步性:一项试点研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 13;12:749710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.749710. eCollection 2021.
9
Tilting Together: An Information-Theoretic Characterization of Behavioral Roles in Rhythmic Dyadic Interaction.共同倾斜:节奏性二元互动中行为角色的信息论表征
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 May 25;14:185. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00185. eCollection 2020.
孤独症患者运动同步时额部θ波激活。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 8;7(1):15034. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14508-4.
4
Oxytocin improves synchronisation in leader-follower interaction.催产素可改善主导-跟随者互动中的同步性。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 8;6:38416. doi: 10.1038/srep38416.
5
A Duet for one.一人二重唱。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Nov;36:390-405. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
6
Transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced global propagation of transient phase resetting associated with directional information flow.经颅磁刺激诱导的与定向信息流相关的瞬态相位重设的全局传播。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 25;8:173. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00173. eCollection 2014.
7
Frontal alpha oscillations distinguish leaders from followers: multivariate decoding of mutually interacting brains.额alpha 振荡区分领导者和追随者:相互作用的大脑的多元解码。
Neuroimage. 2014 Jul 1;94:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
8
'Human paced' walking: followers adopt stride time dynamics of leaders.“人为定步速”行走:跟随者采用领导者的步幅时间动态。
Neurosci Lett. 2014 Apr 3;564:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
9
The ADaptation and Anticipation Model (ADAM) of sensorimotor synchronization.感觉运动同步的适应与预期模型(ADAM)。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 10;7:253. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00253. eCollection 2013.
10
Inter-brain synchronization during coordination of speech rhythm in human-to-human social interaction.人际间言语韵律协调中的大脑间同步性:人类社会互动中的研究
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1692. doi: 10.1038/srep01692.