Douglass Amy, Yip Kathleen, Lumanauw Debryna, Fleischman Ross J, Jordan Jaime, Tanen David A
Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance CA.
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Feb 27;3(3):243-250. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10326. eCollection 2019 Jul.
During emergency medicine (EM) training, residents are exposed to a wide spectrum of patient complaints. We sought to determine how resident clinical experience changes based on training level in relation to the patient acuity levels, chief complaints, and dispositions.
We performed a retrospective chart review of patients seen at a safety-net, academic hospital in Los Angeles from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2016. Resident postgraduate year (PGY) level and specialty, patient acuity (based on the Emergency Severity Index), chief complaint (based on one of 30 categories), and disposition were abstracted. Our primary objective was to examine the progression of EM resident experience throughout the course of training. As a secondary objective, we compared the cases seen by EM and off-service PGY-1s.
A total of 49,535 visits were examined, and of these, 32,870 (66.4%) were in the adult ED (AED) and 16,665 (33.6%) were in the pediatric ED (PED). The median acuity level was 3, and 27.4% of AED patients and 7.3% of PED patients were admitted. Data from 126 residents were analyzed. This included 94 PGY-1 residents (16 EM and 78 off-service), 16 PGY-2 EM, and 16 PGY-3 EM residents. Residents of different training levels evaluated different types of patients. Senior EM residents were more likely to care for higher-acuity patients than junior EM residents. EM PGY-3s saw higher percentages of acuity level 1 and 2 patients (2.3 and 37.8%, respectively, of their total patients) than EM PGY-1s (0.3 and 18.7%, respectively). Conversely, EM PGY-1s saw higher percentages of acuity level 4 and 5 patients (27.9 and 1.6%, respectively) compared to EM PGY-3s (10.7 and 0.7%, respectively). There was a significant linear trend for increasing acuity with training year among EM residents (p < 0.001). EM PGY-1s saw more patients than off-service PGY-1s with slightly higher acuities and admission rates.
The clinical experience of EM residents varies based on their level of training. EM residents show a progression throughout residency and are more likely to encounter higher volumes of patients with higher acuity as they progress in their training. When designing EM residency curriculums, this is a model of an EM residency program.
在急诊医学(EM)培训期间,住院医师会接触到各种各样的患者主诉。我们试图确定住院医师的临床经验如何根据培训水平的变化而与患者病情严重程度、主要主诉及处置情况相关。
我们对2015年7月1日至2016年6月30日在洛杉矶一家安全网学术医院就诊的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。提取了住院医师的研究生学年(PGY)水平和专业、患者病情严重程度(基于急诊严重程度指数)、主要主诉(基于30类中的一类)以及处置情况。我们的主要目标是研究急诊医学住院医师在整个培训过程中的经验进展。作为次要目标,我们比较了急诊医学住院医师和非急诊医学PGY-1住院医师所诊治的病例。
共检查了49535次就诊,其中32870次(66.4%)在成人急诊科(AED),16665次(33.6%)在儿科急诊科(PED)。病情严重程度中位数为3,AED患者中有27.4%、PED患者中有7.3%被收治。分析了126名住院医师的数据。其中包括94名PGY-1住院医师(16名急诊医学住院医师和78名非急诊医学住院医师)、16名PGY-2急诊医学住院医师和16名PGY-3急诊医学住院医师。不同培训水平的住院医师评估不同类型的患者。高级急诊医学住院医师比初级急诊医学住院医师更有可能照料病情更严重的患者。急诊医学PGY-3诊治的病情严重程度为1级和2级的患者比例(分别占其总患者的2.3%和37.8%)高于急诊医学PGY-1(分别为0.3%和18.7%)。相反,急诊医学PGY-1诊治的病情严重程度为四级和五级的患者比例(分别为27.9%和1.6%)高于急诊医学PGY-3(分别为10.7%和0.7%)。急诊医学住院医师中,随着培训年份增加,病情严重程度呈显著线性趋势上升(p<0.001)。急诊医学PGY-1诊治的患者比非急诊医学PGY-1多,且病情严重程度和收治率略高。
急诊医学住院医师的临床经验因其培训水平而异。急诊医学住院医师在整个住院医师培训期间经验不断进展,随着培训的推进,他们更有可能遇到更多病情更严重的患者。在设计急诊医学住院医师培训课程时,这是一个急诊医学住院医师培训项目的模型。