• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Needles in a Haystack: Finding Qualitative and Quantitative Collaborators in Academic Medical Centers.《大海捞针:在学术医疗中心寻找定性和定量合作者》。
Acad Med. 2023 Aug 1;98(8):889-895. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005212. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Transforming the Future of Surgeon-Scientists.变革外科医生-科学家的未来。
Ann Surg. 2024 Feb 1;279(2):231-239. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006148. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
4
Facebook for scientists: requirements and services for optimizing how scientific collaborations are established.面向科学家的Facebook:优化科学合作建立方式的要求与服务。
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Aug 13;10(3):e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1047.
5
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
6
Project development teams: a novel mechanism for accelerating translational research.项目开发团队:加速转化研究的新机制。
Acad Med. 2015 Jan;90(1):40-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000528.
7
A Matrix Mentoring Model That Effectively Supports Clinical and Translational Scientists and Increases Inclusion in Biomedical Research: Lessons From the University of Utah.一种有效支持临床和转化科学家并增加生物医学研究包容性的矩阵指导模式:来自犹他大学的经验教训。
Acad Med. 2016 Apr;91(4):497-502. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001021.
8
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing partnerships for academic data science consulting and collaboration units.为学术数据科学咨询与合作单位建立合作伙伴关系。
Stat (Int Stat Inst). 2024;13(1). doi: 10.1002/sta4.644. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
2
Methods for building a staff workforce of quantitative scientists in academic health care.在学术医疗领域建立定量科学家员工队伍的方法。
Stat (Int Stat Inst). 2024 Jun;13(2). doi: 10.1002/sta4.683. Epub 2024 May 5.
3
A guide to successful management of collaborative partnerships in quantitative research: An illustration of the science of team science.定量研究中合作关系成功管理指南:团队科学之例证
Stat (Int Stat Inst). 2024 Jun;13(2). doi: 10.1002/sta4.674. Epub 2024 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Data science in clinical and translational research: Improving the health of the data to knowledge pipeline.临床与转化研究中的数据科学:改善从数据到知识的流程以增进健康。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Mar 9;5(1):e77. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.569.
2
Developing an Applied Biostatistical Sciences (ABS) network.建立一个应用生物统计学科学(ABS)网络。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul 6;5(1):e15. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.506.
3
Strategies for Success: Early-Stage Collaborating Biostatistics Faculty in an Academic Health Center.成功策略:学术健康中心的早期合作生物统计学教员
Am Stat. 2017;71(3):220-230. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1277157. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
4
Supporting researchers through full-service hotline and consultation services: Success in simplicity, customization, and staffing.通过全方位服务热线和咨询服务为研究人员提供支持:成功源于简单性、定制化和人员配备。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 10;4(1):3-7. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.428. eCollection 2020 Feb.
5
Ten Essential Practices for Developing or Reforming a Biostatistics Core for a NCI Designated Cancer Center.为国立癌症研究所指定的癌症中心建立或改革生物统计学核心的十项基本实践。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Apr 28;2(1):pky010. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky010. eCollection 2018 Jan.
6
Engaging the Community in the Dissemination, Implementation, and Improvement of Health-Related Research.让社区参与健康相关研究的传播、实施和改进。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):814-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12342. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
7
Breaking down translation barriers: investigator's perspective.打破翻译壁垒:研究者的视角
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Sep 3;6(252):252cm7. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008252.
8
Strategies for developing biostatistics resources in an academic health center.在学术医疗中心发展生物统计学资源的策略。
Acad Med. 2013 Apr;88(4):454-60. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828578ed.
9
Practice-based research--"Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap.基于实践的研究——美国国立卫生研究院路线图上的“蓝色高速公路”。
JAMA. 2007 Jan 24;297(4):403-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.4.403.
10
Breaking the translational barriers: the value of integrating biomedical informatics and translational research.打破转化障碍:整合生物医学信息学与转化研究的价值。
J Investig Med. 2005 May;53(4):192-200. doi: 10.2310/6650.2005.00402.

《大海捞针:在学术医疗中心寻找定性和定量合作者》。

Needles in a Haystack: Finding Qualitative and Quantitative Collaborators in Academic Medical Centers.

机构信息

G.-M. Pomann is assistant professor and director, Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design (BERD) Methods Core, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6324-3953 .

T. Truong is a senior biostatistician, assistant director of BERD Core, and lead BERD navigator, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5923-4037 .

出版信息

Acad Med. 2023 Aug 1;98(8):889-895. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005212. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005212
PMID:36940408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10440235/
Abstract

Translational research is a data-driven process that involves transforming scientific laboratory- and clinic-based discoveries into products and activities with real-world impact to improve individual and population health. Successful execution of translational research requires collaboration between clinical and translational science researchers, who have expertise in a wide variety of domains across the field of medicine, and qualitative and quantitative scientists, who have specialized methodologic expertise across diverse methodologic domains. While many institutions are working to build networks of these specialists, a formalized process is needed to help researchers navigate the network to find the best match and to track the navigation process to evaluate an institution's unmet collaborative needs. In 2018, a novel analytic resource navigation process was developed at Duke University to connect potential collaborators, leverage resources, and foster a community of researchers and scientists. This analytic resource navigation process can be readily adopted by other academic medical centers. The process relies on navigators with broad qualitative and quantitative methodologic knowledge, strong communication and leadership skills, and extensive collaborative experience. The essential elements of the analytic resource navigation process are as follows: (1) strong institutional knowledge of methodologic expertise and access to analytic resources, (2) deep understanding of research needs and methodologic expertise, (3) education of researchers on the role of qualitative and quantitative scientists in the research project, and (4) ongoing evaluation of the analytic resource navigation process to inform improvements. Navigators help researchers determine the type of expertise needed, search the institution to find potential collaborators with that expertise, and document the process to evaluate unmet needs. Although the navigation process can create a basis for an effective solution, some challenges remain, such as having resources to train navigators, comprehensively identifying all potential collaborators, and keeping updated information about resources as methodologists join and leave the institution.

摘要

转化研究是一个数据驱动的过程,它将科学实验室和临床基础发现转化为具有实际影响的产品和活动,以改善个体和人群的健康。转化研究的成功执行需要临床和转化科学研究人员之间的合作,他们在医学领域的各个领域都具有专业知识,以及定性和定量科学家,他们在不同的方法学领域都具有专业方法学知识。虽然许多机构都在努力建立这些专家的网络,但需要一个正式的流程来帮助研究人员在网络中找到最佳匹配,并跟踪导航过程,以评估机构未满足的合作需求。2018 年,杜克大学开发了一种新颖的分析资源导航流程,以连接潜在的合作者,利用资源,并培养研究人员和科学家社区。这种分析资源导航流程可以很容易地被其他学术医疗中心采用。该流程依赖于具有广泛定性和定量方法学知识、强大沟通和领导能力以及丰富合作经验的导航员。分析资源导航流程的基本要素如下:(1)对方法学专业知识和分析资源的深入了解,(2)对研究需求和方法学专业知识的深刻理解,(3)对研究人员进行定性和定量科学家在研究项目中的作用的教育,以及(4)对分析资源导航流程的持续评估,以提供改进信息。导航员帮助研究人员确定所需的专业知识类型,在机构内部搜索具有该专业知识的潜在合作者,并记录流程,以评估未满足的需求。尽管导航流程可以为有效的解决方案奠定基础,但仍存在一些挑战,例如培训导航员的资源、全面识别所有潜在合作者,以及随着方法学家加入和离开机构,保持资源信息的更新。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fa8/10440235/ae709555a9ce/nihms-1882074-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fa8/10440235/e6f4e8ebdf81/nihms-1882074-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fa8/10440235/ae709555a9ce/nihms-1882074-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fa8/10440235/e6f4e8ebdf81/nihms-1882074-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fa8/10440235/ae709555a9ce/nihms-1882074-f0002.jpg