García-Grimau Elena, De la Vega Ricardo, Casado Arturo
Department of Physical Education, Sport and Human Movement, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Spanish Agency for Health Protection in Sport, Madrid, Spain.
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Mar 11;4:842959. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.842959. eCollection 2022.
Coaches strongly influence athletes' attitudes toward doping and can shape athlete's beliefs, behaviors, and decisions to be for or against doping. Coached-centered studies examining multiple factors affecting coaches' doping attitudes and behavior are scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze for the first-time attitudes toward doping in athletics coaches using the Sport Drug Control Model (SDCM) as a theoretical framework. A secondary aim was to determine the factors in the model predicting attitude and susceptibility toward doping. A cross-sectional study was carried out using a sample consisting of 201 Spanish athletics competitive level coaches from whom 11.4% were female. Participants completed a cross-sectional online survey. Structural equation modeling showed a good fitness of the SDCM. Positive attitudes toward doping predicted high susceptibility to doping (β = 0.39, < 0.001). Moral disengagement (β = 0.58, < 0.001), descriptive norms (β = 0.42, = 0.001), ego-oriented goals (β = 0.34, < 0.05), and self-efficacy to refrain from doping (β = 0.26, < 0.05) displayed a significant influence on attitudes toward doping. Self-reported doping prevalence in coaches was 4.5%. These variables should be considered when designing anti-doping research projects and educational programs aiming at modifying coaches' attitudes toward doping. It is recommended to focus more efforts on coaches, without putting aside the athletes, and therefore turn coaches into reliable doping prevention factors. To this end, it is necessary to enhance scientific research and then develop, implement, and promote more educational programs targeting coaches, on a mandatory basis while covering the specific needs of coaches so that they can perform their role as anti-doping educators in an effective, committed, and proactive manner.
教练对运动员对待使用兴奋剂的态度有很大影响,并且能够塑造运动员支持或反对使用兴奋剂的信念、行为和决定。以教练为中心、研究影响教练使用兴奋剂态度和行为的多个因素的研究很少。本研究的目的是首次以运动药物控制模型(SDCM)为理论框架,分析田径教练对使用兴奋剂的态度。第二个目的是确定该模型中预测对使用兴奋剂的态度和易感性的因素。采用横断面研究,样本包括201名西班牙田径竞技水平教练,其中11.4%为女性。参与者完成了一项横断面在线调查。结构方程模型显示SDCM拟合良好。对使用兴奋剂的积极态度预示着对使用兴奋剂的高易感性(β = 0.39,P < 0.001)。道德推脱(β = 0.58,P < 0.001)、描述性规范(β = 0.42,P = 0.001)、自我导向目标(β = 0.34,P < 0.05)和克制使用兴奋剂的自我效能感(β = 0.26,P < 0.05)对使用兴奋剂的态度有显著影响。教练自我报告的使用兴奋剂流行率为4.5%。在设计旨在改变教练对使用兴奋剂态度的反兴奋剂研究项目和教育计划时,应考虑这些变量。建议在不忽视运动员的情况下,更多地关注教练,从而将教练转变为可靠的反兴奋剂预防因素。为此,有必要加强科学研究,然后制定、实施和推广更多针对教练的教育计划,在强制实施的同时满足教练的特定需求,以便他们能够以有效、尽责和积极主动的方式履行反兴奋剂教育者的职责。