• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国城市在线约会市场的结构。

Structure of Online Dating Markets in U.S. Cities.

作者信息

Bruch Elizabeth E, Newman M E J

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Center for the Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan, and Santa Fe Institute.

Department of Physics and Center for the Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan, and Santa Fe Institute.

出版信息

Sociol Sci. 2019;6:219-234. doi: 10.15195/v6.a9. Epub 2019 Apr 2.

DOI:10.15195/v6.a9
PMID:31363485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6666423/
Abstract

We study the structure of heterosexual dating markets in the United States through an analysis of the interactions of several million users of a large online dating website, applying recently developed network analysis methods to the pattern of messages exchanged among users. Our analysis shows that the strongest driver of romantic interaction at the national level is simple geographic proximity, but at the local level, other demographic factors come into play. We find that dating markets in each city are partitioned into submarkets along lines of age and ethnicity. Sex ratio varies widely between submarkets, with younger submarkets having more men and fewer women than older ones. There is also a noticeable tendency for minorities, especially women, to be younger than the average in older submarkets, and our analysis reveals how this kind of racial stratification arises through the messaging decisions of both men and women. Our study illustrates how network techniques applied to online interactions can reveal the aggregate effects of individual behavior on social structure.

摘要

我们通过分析一家大型在线约会网站数百万用户的互动情况,运用最近开发的网络分析方法来研究美国异性约会市场的结构,这些方法适用于用户之间交换信息的模式。我们的分析表明,在全国范围内,浪漫互动的最强驱动力是简单的地理接近度,但在地方层面,其他人口因素也会发挥作用。我们发现,每个城市的约会市场都按照年龄和种族划分成子市场。子市场之间的性别比例差异很大,较年轻的子市场男性比女性多,而较年长的子市场则相反。少数族裔,尤其是女性,在较年长的子市场中明显有比平均年龄更年轻的趋势,我们的分析揭示了这种种族分层是如何通过男性和女性双方的信息传递决策产生的。我们的研究说明了应用于在线互动的网络技术如何能够揭示个体行为对社会结构的总体影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/6666423/108c2614b423/nihms-1038473-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/6666423/fcb4c1689913/nihms-1038473-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/6666423/a5887805b62e/nihms-1038473-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/6666423/70fbd03e7db0/nihms-1038473-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/6666423/108c2614b423/nihms-1038473-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/6666423/fcb4c1689913/nihms-1038473-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/6666423/a5887805b62e/nihms-1038473-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/6666423/70fbd03e7db0/nihms-1038473-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e13c/6666423/108c2614b423/nihms-1038473-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Structure of Online Dating Markets in U.S. Cities.美国城市在线约会市场的结构。
Sociol Sci. 2019;6:219-234. doi: 10.15195/v6.a9. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
2
Aspirational pursuit of mates in online dating markets.在网络约会市场中对伴侣的理想化追求。
Sci Adv. 2018 Aug 8;4(8):eaap9815. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aap9815. eCollection 2018 Aug.
3
Mind, Body and Boundaries: Self-Presentation on the Nordic LGBTQ Online Dating Scene.心灵、身体与界限:北欧 LGBTQ 在线约会场景中的自我呈现
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 10;10:2770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02770. eCollection 2019.
4
Do Global Cities Enable Global Views? Using Twitter to Quantify the Level of Geographical Awareness of U.S. Cities.全球城市能带来全球视野吗?利用推特量化美国城市的地理认知水平。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 13;10(7):e0132464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132464. eCollection 2015.
5
Who visits online dating sites? Exploring some characteristics of online daters.哪些人会访问在线约会网站?探索在线约会者的一些特征。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007 Dec;10(6):849-52. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9941.
6
Google for Sexual Relationships: Mixed-Methods Study on Digital Flirting and Online Dating Among Adolescent Youth and Young Adults.谷歌与性关系:关于青少年和青年数字调情与在线约会的混合方法研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 May 16;5(2):e10695. doi: 10.2196/10695.
7
"Where Have All the Good Men Gone?" Gendered Interactions in Online Dating.“所有优秀男人都去哪儿了?”在线约会中的性别互动
J Marriage Fam. 2014 Apr 1;76(2):387-410. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12072.
8
eHealth Search Patterns: A Comparison of Private and Public Health Care Markets Using Online Panel Data.电子健康搜索模式:使用在线面板数据对私营和公共医疗保健市场的比较
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 13;19(4):e117. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6739.
9
Exploring the Relationship Between Online Social Network Site Usage and the Impact on Quality of Life for Older and Younger Users: An Interaction Analysis.探究在线社交网站使用与对老年和年轻用户生活质量影响之间的关系:一项交互分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 29;18(9):e245. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5377.
10
Motives and Concerns Associated with Geosocial Networking App Usage: An Exploratory Study Among Heterosexual College Students in the United States.与社交地理网络应用程序使用相关的动机和关注点:美国异性恋大学生的探索性研究。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Apr;21(4):268-275. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0309.

引用本文的文献

1
Classed Pathways to Marriage: Hometown Ties, College Networks, and Life after Graduation.婚姻的分类途径:家乡纽带、大学人脉与毕业后的生活。
J Marriage Fam. 2021 Aug;83(4):1004-1019. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12747. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
2
The Network Structure of Occupations: Fragmentation, Differentiation, and Contagion.职业的网络结构:碎片化、差异化与传染性。
AJS. 2022 Mar;127(5):1551-1601. doi: 10.1086/719407.
3
Sex Differences in Attention and Attitude Toward Infant and Sexual Images.对婴儿和性相关图像的注意力及态度方面的性别差异。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Nov;52(8):3291-3299. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02676-6. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
4
Is Dating Behavior in Digital Contexts Driven by Evolutionary Programs? A Selective Review.数字环境中的约会行为是由进化程序驱动的吗?选择性综述。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 28;13:678439. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.678439. eCollection 2022.
5
Internet access and partnership formation in the United States.互联网接入与美国的伙伴关系形成。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2022 Nov;76(3):427-445. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2021.1999485. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
6
Online activity of mosques and Muslims in the Netherlands: A study of Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and Twitter.荷兰清真寺和穆斯林的在线活动:对 Facebook、Instagram、YouTube 和 Twitter 的研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254881. eCollection 2021.
7
A guide to choosing and implementing reference models for social network analysis.社会网络分析参考模型选择与实施指南
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Dec;96(6):2716-2734. doi: 10.1111/brv.12775. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
8
Do Local Sex Ratios Approximate Subjective Partner Markets? : Evidence from the German Family Panel.本地性别比例是否接近主观的伴侣市场?:来自德国家庭面板的证据。
Hum Nat. 2021 Jun;32(2):406-433. doi: 10.1007/s12110-021-09397-6. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
9
Location inference for hidden population with online text analysis.基于在线文本分析的隐匿人群定位推断。
Int J Health Geogr. 2020 Dec 9;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12942-020-00245-x.
10
Network Evolution of a Large Online MSM Dating Community: 2005-2018.大型在线男男性行为者交友社区的网络演化:2005-2018 年。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 6;16(22):4322. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224322.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Connectedness: Measurement, Determinants, and Effects.社会联系:测量、决定因素及影响
J Econ Perspect. 2018;32(3):259-80.
2
Extracting multistage screening rules from online dating activity data.从在线约会活动数据中提取多阶段筛选规则。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 20;113(38):10530-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522494113. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
3
A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks.人工网络中社区检测算法的比较分析
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 1;6:30750. doi: 10.1038/srep30750.
4
Assortative mating without assortative preference.无择偶偏好的选型交配。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 12;112(19):5974-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504811112. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
5
Trends in ages at key reproductive transitions in the United States, 1951-2010.美国关键生殖期年龄趋势,1951-2010 年。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 May-Jun;24(3):e271-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
6
The limits of racial prejudice.种族偏见的界限。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 19;110(47):18814-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308501110. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
7
Asymptotic analysis of the stochastic block model for modular networks and its algorithmic applications.模块化网络随机块模型的渐近分析及其算法应用。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Dec;84(6 Pt 2):066106. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.066106. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
8
TOO MANY MEN? SEX RATIOS AND WOMEN'S PARTNERING BEHAVIOR IN CHINA.男性过多?中国的性别比例与女性的择偶行为
Soc Forces. 2011 Sep;90(1):247-267. doi: 10.1093/sf/90.1.247.
9
Stochastic blockmodels and community structure in networks.网络中的随机块模型与社区结构
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Jan;83(1 Pt 2):016107. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.016107. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
10
Earnings Inequality and the Changing Association between Spouses' Earnings.收入不平等与配偶收入之间不断变化的关联。
AJS. 2010 Mar 1;115(5):1524-1557. doi: 10.1086/651373.