• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过认知行为干预降低严重行为问题的风险:实施两年后“相处之道”课程工具的效果

Lowering Risk for Significant Behavior Problems Through Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention: Effects of the Tools for Getting Along Curriculum 2 Years Following Implementation.

作者信息

Daunic Ann P, Smith Stephen W, Aydin Burak, Barber Brian

机构信息

University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

RTE University, Rize, Turkey.

出版信息

J Prim Prev. 2019 Aug;40(4):463-482. doi: 10.1007/s10935-019-00554-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10935-019-00554-3
PMID:31363945
Abstract

To address the needs of students at risk for significant behavior problems, educators need efficient, effective, and feasible preventive classroom interventions that increase students' ability to regulate their own behavior. Tools for Getting Along is a universally delivered cognitive-behavioral curriculum designed to address early emotional and behavioral risk among fourth and fifth grade students within the general classroom setting. We used latent growth model statistical methodology to investigate the effects of Tools for Getting Along 2 years following treatment cessation on students who evidenced baseline risk relative to peers. We followed an average of 455 students across measure-specific baseline risk groups at pretest, posttest, 1-year post-treatment, and 2-years post-treatment. Growth models fit data for four (behavior regulation, metacognition, aggression, and behavioral adjustment) of the eight factors used to assess emotional and behavioral outcomes. Findings indicated a long-term positive treatment effect for students at baseline risk on behavior regulation and general behavioral adjustment. We discuss how findings related to long-term treatment benefits add to prior research on Tools for Getting Along and to the evaluation of preventive treatment effects on emotional and behavioral risk over time.

摘要

为满足有严重行为问题风险的学生的需求,教育工作者需要高效、有效且可行的预防性课堂干预措施,以提高学生自我行为调节的能力。《相处之道》是一门面向全体学生的认知行为课程,旨在解决普通课堂环境中四、五年级学生早期的情绪和行为风险问题。我们使用潜在增长模型统计方法,研究了停止治疗两年后,《相处之道》对相对于同龄人有基线风险的学生的影响。我们在测试前、测试后、治疗后1年和治疗后2年,对平均455名跨特定测量基线风险组的学生进行了跟踪。增长模型拟合了用于评估情绪和行为结果的八个因素中的四个(行为调节、元认知、攻击性和行为调整)的数据。研究结果表明,基线有风险的学生在行为调节和总体行为调整方面有长期的积极治疗效果。我们讨论了与长期治疗益处相关的研究结果如何补充先前关于《相处之道》的研究,以及如何随时间推移评估预防性治疗对情绪和行为风险的效果。

相似文献

1
Lowering Risk for Significant Behavior Problems Through Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention: Effects of the Tools for Getting Along Curriculum 2 Years Following Implementation.通过认知行为干预降低严重行为问题的风险:实施两年后“相处之道”课程工具的效果
J Prim Prev. 2019 Aug;40(4):463-482. doi: 10.1007/s10935-019-00554-3.
2
Reducing developmental risk for emotional/behavioral problems: a randomized controlled trial examining the Tools for Getting Along curriculum.降低情绪/行为问题的发育风险:一项关于“相处工具”课程的随机对照试验。
J Sch Psychol. 2012 Apr;50(2):149-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
3
Preventing risk for significant behavior problems through a cognitive-behavioral intervention: effects of the tools for getting along curriculum at one-year follow-up.通过认知行为干预预防严重行为问题的风险:“相处之道”课程工具在一年随访时的效果
J Prim Prev. 2014 Oct;35(5):371-87. doi: 10.1007/s10935-014-0357-0.
4
Variation in Response to Evidence-Based Group Preventive Intervention for Disruptive Behavior Problems: A View from 938 Coping Power Sessions.基于证据的团体预防干预措施对破坏性行为问题的反应变化:来自 938 次应对力量课程的观点。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 Oct;45(7):1271-1284. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0252-7.
5
Examining Effectiveness of Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Externalizing and Internalizing Disorders in Urban Schools.考察团体认知行为疗法对城市学校外化性和内化性障碍的有效性。
Behav Modif. 2016 Jul;40(4):611-39. doi: 10.1177/0145445516631093. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
6
How do collective student behavior and other classroom contextual factors relate to teachers' implementation of an evidence-based intervention? A multilevel structural equation model.集体学生行为和其他课堂背景因素如何与教师实施基于证据的干预措施相关?多层次结构方程模型。
Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Dec;31(5):1827-1835. doi: 10.1017/S095457941900097X.
7
Results of a model AIDS prevention program for high school students in the Philippines.菲律宾针对高中生的艾滋病预防示范项目成果。
AIDS. 1995 Jul;9 Suppl 1:S7-13.
8
The effectiveness of Rock and Water in improving students' socio-emotional adjustment and social safety: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.岩-水疗法对改善学生社会情感调整和社会安全的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychol. 2018 Jul 25;6(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40359-018-0247-y.
9
Evaluating the real-world effectiveness of a cognitive behavior therapy-based transdiagnostic program for emotional problems in children in a regular school setting.评估认知行为疗法为基础的针对儿童情绪问题的跨诊断方案在常规学校环境中的真实世界疗效。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 15;253:357-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.036. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
10
Acceptability and student outcomes of a violence prevention curriculum.一项预防暴力课程的可接受性及学生学习成果
J Prim Prev. 2005 Sep;26(5):401-18. doi: 10.1007/s10935-005-0002-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Intervention of Sports on Adolescent Health Risk Behavior.人工智能在运动干预青少年健康风险行为中的应用。
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 Apr 11;2022:1594108. doi: 10.1155/2022/1594108. eCollection 2022.
2
The Effects of Emotion Regulation Treatment on Disruptive Behavior Problems in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.情绪调节治疗对儿童破坏性行为问题的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2022 Jul;50(7):895-905. doi: 10.1007/s10802-022-00903-7. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Promoting Positive Youth Development Through School-Based Social and Emotional Learning Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Follow-Up Effects.通过基于学校的社会和情绪学习干预促进青少年积极发展:随访效果的元分析。
Child Dev. 2017 Jul;88(4):1156-1171. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12864.
2
The Consequences of Ignoring Variability in Measurement Occasions Within Data Collection Waves in Latent Growth Models.潜在增长模型中忽视数据收集波次内测量时机变异性的后果。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2014 Mar-Apr;49(2):149-60. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.887901.
3
Preventing risk for significant behavior problems through a cognitive-behavioral intervention: effects of the tools for getting along curriculum at one-year follow-up.
通过认知行为干预预防严重行为问题的风险:“相处之道”课程工具在一年随访时的效果
J Prim Prev. 2014 Oct;35(5):371-87. doi: 10.1007/s10935-014-0357-0.
4
The development of metacognitive ability in adolescence.青少年元认知能力的发展。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Mar;22(1):264-71. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
5
Three year follow-up of coping power intervention effects: evidence of neighborhood moderation?应对能力干预效果的三年随访:有邻里调节作用的证据吗?
Prev Sci. 2013 Aug;14(4):364-76. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0295-0.
6
Reducing developmental risk for emotional/behavioral problems: a randomized controlled trial examining the Tools for Getting Along curriculum.降低情绪/行为问题的发育风险:一项关于“相处工具”课程的随机对照试验。
J Sch Psychol. 2012 Apr;50(2):149-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
7
Growth modeling with nonignorable dropout: alternative analyses of the STAR*D antidepressant trial.采用不可忽视缺失数据的生长模型:STAR*D 抗抑郁试验的替代分析。
Psychol Methods. 2011 Mar;16(1):17-33. doi: 10.1037/a0022634.
8
A developmental perspective on executive function.从发展的角度看执行功能。
Child Dev. 2010 Nov-Dec;81(6):1641-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x.
9
School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: update of a meta-analysis.针对攻击性行为和破坏性行为的校本干预措施:一项荟萃分析的更新
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Aug;33(2 Suppl):S130-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.011.
10
Effectiveness of universal school-based programs to prevent violent and aggressive behavior: a systematic review.基于学校的通用项目预防暴力和攻击行为的有效性:一项系统综述。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Aug;33(2 Suppl):S114-29. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.012.