• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过认知行为干预预防严重行为问题的风险:“相处之道”课程工具在一年随访时的效果

Preventing risk for significant behavior problems through a cognitive-behavioral intervention: effects of the tools for getting along curriculum at one-year follow-up.

作者信息

Smith Stephen W, Daunic Ann P, Barber Brian R, Aydin Burak, Van Loan Christopher L, Taylor Gregory G

机构信息

College of Education, University of Florida, 1403 Norman Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA,

出版信息

J Prim Prev. 2014 Oct;35(5):371-87. doi: 10.1007/s10935-014-0357-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10935-014-0357-0
PMID:25062801
Abstract

Efficient and effective social-emotional learning programs increase the likelihood of success in school for all students, and particularly for those who may develop emotional or behavior problems. In this study, we followed a sub-sample of students 1 year after their participation in a randomized controlled trial of the effects of the Tools for Getting Along (TFGA) curriculum. TFGA is a universally delivered, preventive cognitive-behavioral curricular intervention designed to improve upper elementary school students' emotional and behavioral self-regulation. To determine effects at 1-year follow-up, we assessed 720 out of the 1,296 original students across TFGA and control conditions on measures of curricular knowledge, teacher-rated executive function and behavior, and student-reported anger and social problem solving. Findings indicated a continued positive effect on curricular knowledge for students taught TFGA relative to controls. We also found significant pretest by condition interaction effects on teacher reports of skills associated with executive function, including inhibitory control and shift (cognitive flexibility), and on teacher reported internalizing and externalizing behavior. Specifically, students with poorer scores on these measures at pretest benefited from TFGA at follow-up relative to comparable students in the control condition. Finally, we found marginally significant pretest by condition interaction effects on proactive aggression, outward expressions of anger, and the executive function related skills of initiating activities and using working memory. Counter to expectations, we found negative TFGA effects on student-reported trait anger and anger control.

摘要

高效且有效的社会情感学习项目会增加所有学生在学业上取得成功的可能性,尤其是那些可能出现情绪或行为问题的学生。在本研究中,我们追踪了参与“相处工具”(TFGA)课程效果随机对照试验的学生子样本,追踪时间为他们参与试验一年后。TFGA是一种普遍实施的预防性认知行为课程干预措施,旨在提高小学高年级学生的情绪和行为自我调节能力。为了确定一年随访时的效果,我们在TFGA组和对照组的1296名原始学生中,对720名学生进行了课程知识、教师评定的执行功能和行为以及学生报告的愤怒情绪和社会问题解决能力等方面的评估。结果表明,相对于对照组,接受TFGA教学的学生在课程知识方面持续呈现积极效果。我们还发现,根据条件交互作用效应,在教师对与执行功能相关技能的报告方面存在显著的预测试差异,这些技能包括抑制控制和转换(认知灵活性),以及教师报告的内化和外化行为。具体而言,在预测试中这些指标得分较低的学生,相对于对照组中类似的学生,在随访时从TFGA中受益。最后,我们发现,根据条件交互作用效应,在主动攻击、愤怒的外在表现以及与执行功能相关的发起活动和使用工作记忆技能方面存在边缘显著差异。与预期相反,我们发现TFGA对学生报告的特质愤怒和愤怒控制有负面影响。

相似文献

1
Preventing risk for significant behavior problems through a cognitive-behavioral intervention: effects of the tools for getting along curriculum at one-year follow-up.通过认知行为干预预防严重行为问题的风险:“相处之道”课程工具在一年随访时的效果
J Prim Prev. 2014 Oct;35(5):371-87. doi: 10.1007/s10935-014-0357-0.
2
Reducing developmental risk for emotional/behavioral problems: a randomized controlled trial examining the Tools for Getting Along curriculum.降低情绪/行为问题的发育风险:一项关于“相处工具”课程的随机对照试验。
J Sch Psychol. 2012 Apr;50(2):149-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
3
Lowering Risk for Significant Behavior Problems Through Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention: Effects of the Tools for Getting Along Curriculum 2 Years Following Implementation.通过认知行为干预降低严重行为问题的风险:实施两年后“相处之道”课程工具的效果
J Prim Prev. 2019 Aug;40(4):463-482. doi: 10.1007/s10935-019-00554-3.
4
Efficacy of the social-emotional learning foundations curriculum for kindergarten and first grade students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders.社交情感学习基础课程对有情绪和行为障碍风险的幼儿园和一年级学生的疗效。
J Sch Psychol. 2021 Jun;86:78-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
5
The mediational role of neurocognition in the behavioral outcomes of a social-emotional prevention program in elementary school students: effects of the PATHS Curriculum.神经认知在小学生社会情感预防项目行为结果中的中介作用:PATHS课程的效果
Prev Sci. 2006 Mar;7(1):91-102. doi: 10.1007/s11121-005-0022-1. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
6
Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS) and elementary school aged children's aggression: results from a cluster randomized trial.促进替代思维策略(PATHS)和小学生的攻击性:一项集群随机试验的结果。
Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Sep;52(1-2):56-72. doi: 10.1007/s10464-013-9576-4.
7
How Do School-Based Prevention Programs Impact Teachers? Findings from a Randomized Trial of an Integrated Classroom Management and Social-Emotional Program.以学校为基础的预防项目如何影响教师?一项综合课堂管理与社会情感项目随机试验的结果。
Prev Sci. 2016 Apr;17(3):325-37. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0618-z.
8
Mental Health Prevention in Preschool Children: study protocol for a feasibility and acceptability randomised controlled trial of a culturally adapted version of the I Can Problem Solve (ICPS) Programme in Chile.学龄前儿童心理健康预防:智利一项针对文化适应性版本的“我能解决问题”(ICPS)计划的可行性和可接受性随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Mar 4;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3245-3.
9
Short-Term Intervention Effects of the PATHS Curriculum in Young Low-Income Children: Capitalizing on Plasticity.“路径”课程对低收入家庭幼儿的短期干预效果:利用可塑性
J Prim Prev. 2016 Dec;37(6):493-511. doi: 10.1007/s10935-016-0452-5.
10
Preventing conduct problems and improving school readiness: evaluation of the Incredible Years Teacher and Child Training Programs in high-risk schools.预防行为问题并提高入学准备能力:对高风险学校中“非凡岁月教师与儿童培训项目”的评估。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 May;49(5):471-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01861.x. Epub 2008 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Fadeout and persistence of intervention impacts on social-emotional and cognitive skills in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials.干预对儿童和青少年社会情感和认知技能的影响的淡出和持续:随机对照试验的荟萃分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2024 Oct;150(10):1207-1236. doi: 10.1037/bul0000450.
2
The Effects of Emotion Regulation Treatment on Disruptive Behavior Problems in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.情绪调节治疗对儿童破坏性行为问题的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2022 Jul;50(7):895-905. doi: 10.1007/s10802-022-00903-7. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
3
Lowering Risk for Significant Behavior Problems Through Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention: Effects of the Tools for Getting Along Curriculum 2 Years Following Implementation.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing developmental risk for emotional/behavioral problems: a randomized controlled trial examining the Tools for Getting Along curriculum.降低情绪/行为问题的发育风险:一项关于“相处工具”课程的随机对照试验。
J Sch Psychol. 2012 Apr;50(2):149-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
2
Executive functions and self-regulation.执行功能和自我调节。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Mar;16(3):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
3
Monitoring, metacognition, and executive function: elucidating the role of self-reflection in the development of self-regulation.
通过认知行为干预降低严重行为问题的风险:实施两年后“相处之道”课程工具的效果
J Prim Prev. 2019 Aug;40(4):463-482. doi: 10.1007/s10935-019-00554-3.
4
The Effectiveness of a Portuguese Elementary School Social and Emotional Learning Program.葡萄牙一所小学社会情感学习项目的成效
J Prim Prev. 2016 Oct;37(5):433-47. doi: 10.1007/s10935-016-0445-4.
5
Coping Power Adapted as Universal Prevention Program: Mid Term Effects on Children's Behavioral Difficulties and Academic Grades.作为普遍预防计划改编的应对能力:对儿童行为困难和学业成绩的中期影响。
J Prim Prev. 2016 Aug;37(4):389-401. doi: 10.1007/s10935-016-0435-6.
监测、元认知和执行功能:阐明自我反思在自我调节发展中的作用。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2011;40:379-412. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-386491-8.00010-4.
4
The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions.增强学生社会情感学习的影响:基于学校的普遍干预措施的元分析。
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):405-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.
5
The effects of a multiyear universal social-emotional learning program: The role of student and school characteristics.多年普遍的社会情感学习项目的效果:学生和学校特点的作用。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Apr;78(2):156-68. doi: 10.1037/a0018607.
6
Longitudinal relations of children's effortful control, impulsivity, and negative emotionality to their externalizing, internalizing, and co-occurring behavior problems.儿童的努力控制、冲动性和负性情绪与他们的外化、内化及共现行为问题之间的纵向关系。
Dev Psychol. 2009 Jul;45(4):988-1008. doi: 10.1037/a0016213.
7
New directions in evaluating social problem solving in childhood: early precursors and links to adolescent social competence.儿童期社会问题解决评估的新方向:早期先兆及与青少年社会能力的联系。
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2009 Spring;2009(123):51-68. doi: 10.1002/cd.235.
8
Introduction: Links between social interaction and executive function.引言:社交互动与执行功能之间的联系。
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2009 Spring;2009(123):1-15. doi: 10.1002/cd.232.
9
The Anger Expression Scale for Children: initial validation among healthy children and children with cancer.儿童愤怒表达量表:在健康儿童和癌症患儿中的初步验证
J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Jan-Feb;34(1):51-62. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn054. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
10
Anger expression in children and adolescents: a review of the empirical literature.儿童和青少年的愤怒表达:实证文献综述
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;28(4):559-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.08.001. Epub 2007 Aug 9.