• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的首次经验。

First Experience of Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan.

作者信息

Kagiyama Koutaro, Ueno Takafumi, Mitsutake Yoshiaki, Yamaji Kazunori, Ishimatsu Takashi, Sasaki Ken-Ichiro, Fukumoto Yoshihiro

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;58(23):3415-3419. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3272-19. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.3272-19
PMID:31366804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6928489/
Abstract

In 2018, the CorPath GRX system (Corindus) was approved for use in Japan, marking the introduction of the first robotic-assisted system for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the country. The present report describes the first experience of robotic-assisted PCI for four coronary lesions in two cases in a single center. All procedures succeeded without any complications, although one procedure was converted to manual PCI by the operator's decision. Post-marketing surveillance to assess the impact of this novel system on both Japanese patients and physicians is currently ongoing in Japan.

摘要

2018年,CorPath GRX系统(Corindus公司)在日本获批使用,标志着该国首个用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的机器人辅助系统问世。本报告描述了在单一中心对两例患者的四个冠状动脉病变进行机器人辅助PCI的首例经验。所有手术均成功完成,无任何并发症,不过有一例手术经操作者决定转为手动PCI。目前日本正在进行上市后监测,以评估这一新型系统对日本患者和医生的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cb0/6928489/ad341f045c41/1349-7235-58-3415-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cb0/6928489/dbdb98514ac2/1349-7235-58-3415-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cb0/6928489/18609385654c/1349-7235-58-3415-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cb0/6928489/ad341f045c41/1349-7235-58-3415-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cb0/6928489/dbdb98514ac2/1349-7235-58-3415-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cb0/6928489/18609385654c/1349-7235-58-3415-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cb0/6928489/ad341f045c41/1349-7235-58-3415-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
First Experience of Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan.日本机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的首次经验。
Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;58(23):3415-3419. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3272-19. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
2
Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center.成功将机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入系统引入日本临床实践:单中心首年调查。
Heart Vessels. 2021 Jul;36(7):955-964. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01782-6. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
3
Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion.机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:部分手动辅助或手动转换的原因。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jul;19(5 Pt A):526-531. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
4
Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report.一种新型第二代机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入系统的安全性和可行性:首例人体报告
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Apr;30(4):152-156. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
5
Robotic Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Initial Australian Experience.机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:澳大利亚初步经验。
Heart Lung Circ. 2024 Apr;33(4):493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.01.019. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
6
Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Concept, Data, and Clinical Application.机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:概念、数据及临床应用
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2019 Apr;8(2):149-159. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2018.11.005. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
7
Complication during robotic-PCI: Iatrogenic guiding catheter dissection.机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的并发症:医源性导引导管夹层。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Apr;99(5):1526-1528. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30107. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
8
Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.机器人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和可行性:PRECISE(经皮机器人增强冠状动脉介入治疗)研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 16;61(15):1596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.045.
9
Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through Transradial Approach: Experience in 4 Patients with Complex Lesions.经桡动脉入路机器人辅助冠状动脉介入治疗:4 例复杂病变患者的经验。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2020 Apr 1;47(2):144-148. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-17-6350.
10
Longitudinal Geographic Miss (LGM) in Robotic Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.机器人辅助与手动经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的纵向地理误差(LGM)
J Interv Cardiol. 2015 Oct;28(5):449-55. doi: 10.1111/joic.12231.

引用本文的文献

1
Simulation-Based Training in Aortic Aneurysm Surgery: Toward a New Educational Standard.基于模拟的腹主动脉瘤手术培训:迈向新的教育标准。
Cureus. 2025 Aug 8;17(8):e89611. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89611. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Periprocedural and 30-day outcomes of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention used in the intravascular imaging guidance.在血管内影像指导下使用机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的围手术期和 30 天结果。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2023 Jan;38(1):39-48. doi: 10.1007/s12928-022-00864-0. Epub 2022 May 5.
3
Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in the COVID-19 pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report.一种新型第二代机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入系统的安全性和可行性:首例人体报告
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Apr;30(4):152-156. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
2
Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion.机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:部分手动辅助或手动转换的原因。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jul;19(5 Pt A):526-531. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
3
Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在 COVID-19 大流行期间。
J Cardiol. 2022 Apr;79(4):455-459. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
4
Remote Surgery Using a Neuroendovascular Intervention Support Robot Equipped with a Sensing Function: Experimental Verification.使用配备传感功能的神经血管介入支持机器人进行远程手术:实验验证
Asian J Neurosurg. 2021 May 28;16(2):363-366. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_77_21. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗复杂冠状动脉病变的安全性和可行性研究:CORA-PCI 研究结果(复杂机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul 10;10(13):1320-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.050.
4
Impact of Institutional and Operator Volume on Short-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report From the Japanese Nationwide Registry.机构和术者量对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗短期结局的影响:来自日本全国登记的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May 8;10(9):918-927. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.015.
5
A randomized trial evaluating everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB Japan.在冠状动脉疾病患者中评估依维莫司洗脱 Absorb 生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架的随机试验:ABSORB 日本。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 14;36(47):3332-42. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv435. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
6
The impact of precise robotic lesion length measurement on stent length selection: ramifications for stent savings.精确的机器人病变长度测量对支架长度选择的影响:对节省支架的意义。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Sep;16(6):348-50. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
7
Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach.与传统手动方法相比的机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 Jul;26(7):318-21.
8
Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.机器人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和可行性:PRECISE(经皮机器人增强冠状动脉介入治疗)研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 16;61(15):1596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.045.
9
Brain tumours among interventional cardiologists: a cause for alarm? Report of four new cases from two cities and a review of the literature.介入心脏病学家中的脑肿瘤:值得警惕吗?来自两个城市的 4 个新病例报告及文献复习。
EuroIntervention. 2012 Jan;7(9):1081-6. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I9A172.
10
Radiation cataract risk in interventional cardiology personnel.介入心脏病学人员的辐射性白内障风险。
Radiat Res. 2010 Oct;174(4):490-5. doi: 10.1667/RR2207.1.