Suppr超能文献

采用锝-二乙三胺五乙酸门控法测量的肾小球滤过率不受图像采集过早或延迟启动的显著影响。

Glomerular filtration rate measured by Tc-DTPA Gates method is not significantly affected by the premature or delayed initiation of image acquisition.

作者信息

Ma Guangyu, Shao Mingzhe, Xu Baixuan, Tian Jiahe, Chen Yingmao

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 Jun;9(6):1103-1109. doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.06.14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to examine the effect of non-synchronization of the radiotracer injection and image acquisition on estimates of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the Gates' method.

METHODS

A total of 218 volunteers were selected as the research subjects. Two-sample method (GFR) and Tc-DTPA dynamic renal imaging (GFR) were used for determination of the GFR. We took GFR as the reference method, and then took the peak time of blood perfusion phase as the new time origin to ensure that all patients were unified on the time-radioactivity count rate curve. We moved the radioactivity curve on 9 time points to simulate premature (+20/+15/+10/+5 seconds), synchronous (0 seconds), and delayed (-20/-15/-10/-5 seconds) image acquisition in relation to the completion of tracer injection; we then acquired 9 GFR. The correlation and consistency of GFR and GFR were analyzed. Variance analysis compared the differences between different GFR.

RESULTS

All 9 GFR had good correlation with GFR. GFR and GFR derived from -5, -10 and -15 s had the best correlation (r=0.827, P<0.01). The consistency between GFR derived from +20 s and GFR was the worst, and GFR derived from -15 s and GFR was the best. There were no significant differences between the 9 GFR.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-synchronization of the radiotracer injection and image acquisition has no significant effect on the estimates of the GFR if the premature or delayed time between image acquisition and tracer injection is not more than 20 seconds.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨放射性示踪剂注射与图像采集不同步对Gates法估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)的影响。

方法

选取218名志愿者作为研究对象。采用双样本法(GFR)和Tc-DTPA动态肾显像(GFR)测定GFR。以GFR作为参考方法,然后以血流灌注相的峰值时间作为新的时间原点,确保所有患者在时间-放射性计数率曲线上统一。将放射性曲线在9个时间点上移动,以模拟相对于示踪剂注射完成的过早(+20/+15/+10/+5秒)、同步(0秒)和延迟(-20/-15/-10/-5秒)图像采集;然后获取9个GFR。分析GFR与GFR的相关性和一致性。方差分析比较不同GFR之间的差异。

结果

所有9个GFR与GFR均具有良好的相关性。-5、-10和-15秒时得出的GFR与GFR相关性最佳(r=0.827,P<0.01)。+20秒时得出的GFR与GFR之间的一致性最差,-15秒时得出的GFR与GFR之间的一致性最佳。9个GFR之间无显著差异。

结论

如果图像采集与示踪剂注射之间的过早或延迟时间不超过20秒,放射性示踪剂注射与图像采集不同步对GFR估算无显著影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验