• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数据评估:一种系统设计和实施重新利用临床数据质量评估的实用流程。

DataGauge: A Practical Process for Systematically Designing and Implementing Quality Assessments of Repurposed Clinical Data.

作者信息

Diaz-Garelli Jose-Franck, Bernstam Elmer V, Lee MinJae, Hwang Kevin O, Rahbar Mohammad H, Johnson Todd R

机构信息

Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest School of Medicine, US.

School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, US.

出版信息

EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Jul 25;7(1):32. doi: 10.5334/egems.286.

DOI:10.5334/egems.286
PMID:31367649
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6659577/
Abstract

The well-known hazards of repurposing data make Data Quality (DQ) assessment a vital step towards ensuring valid results regardless of analytical methods. However, there is no systematic process to implement DQ assessments for secondary uses of clinical data. This paper presents DataGauge, a systematic process for designing and implementing DQ assessments to evaluate repurposed data for a specific secondary use. DataGauge is composed of five steps: (1) Define information needs, (2) Develop a formal Data Needs Model (DNM), (3) Use the DNM and DQ theory to develop goal-specific DQ assessment requirements, (4) Extract DNM-specified data, and (5) Evaluate according to DQ requirements. DataGauge's main contribution is integrating general DQ theory and DQ assessment methods into a systematic process. This process supports the integration and practical implementation of existing Electronic Health Record-specific DQ assessment guidelines. DataGauge also provides an initial theory-based guidance framework that ties the DNM to DQ testing methods for each DQ dimension to aid the design of DQ assessments. This framework can be augmented with existing DQ guidelines to enable systematic assessment. DataGauge sets the stage for future systematic DQ assessment research by defining an assessment process, capable of adapting to a broad range of clinical datasets and secondary uses. Defining DataGauge sets the stage for new research directions such as DQ theory integration, DQ requirements portability research, DQ assessment tool development and DQ assessment tool usability.

摘要

数据再利用的诸多已知风险使得数据质量(DQ)评估成为确保无论采用何种分析方法都能得出有效结果的关键步骤。然而,对于临床数据的二次利用,目前尚无实施DQ评估的系统流程。本文介绍了DataGauge,这是一种用于设计和实施DQ评估的系统流程,旨在评估用于特定二次利用的再利用数据。DataGauge由五个步骤组成:(1)定义信息需求,(2)开发正式的数据需求模型(DNM),(3)使用DNM和DQ理论制定针对特定目标的DQ评估要求,(4)提取DNM指定的数据,以及(5)根据DQ要求进行评估。DataGauge的主要贡献在于将通用的DQ理论和DQ评估方法整合到一个系统流程中。该流程支持现有针对电子健康记录的DQ评估指南的整合与实际应用。DataGauge还提供了一个基于理论的初始指导框架,将DNM与每个DQ维度的DQ测试方法联系起来,以辅助DQ评估的设计。通过结合现有的DQ指南,可以增强这个框架以实现系统评估。DataGauge通过定义一个能够适应广泛临床数据集和二次利用的评估流程,为未来系统的DQ评估研究奠定了基础。定义DataGauge为新的研究方向奠定了基础,如DQ理论整合、DQ要求可移植性研究、DQ评估工具开发和DQ评估工具可用性研究。

相似文献

1
DataGauge: A Practical Process for Systematically Designing and Implementing Quality Assessments of Repurposed Clinical Data.数据评估:一种系统设计和实施重新利用临床数据质量评估的实用流程。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Jul 25;7(1):32. doi: 10.5334/egems.286.
2
A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data.电子健康记录数据二次使用的统一数据质量评估术语和框架。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Sep 11;4(1):1244. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1244. eCollection 2016.
3
Developing a Data Quality Standard Primer for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment from Electronic Health Record Data Using the DataGauge Process.利用 DataGauge 流程从电子健康记录数据中开发心血管风险评估数据质量标准入门。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:388-397. eCollection 2021.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Rare Diseases in Hospital Information Systems-An Interoperable Methodology for Distributed Data Quality Assessments.医院信息系统中的罕见病——分布式数据质量评估的可互操作方法。
Methods Inf Med. 2023 Sep;62(3-04):71-89. doi: 10.1055/a-2006-1018. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
6
Data Quality-Driven Improvement in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review.数据驱动的医疗质量改进:系统文献回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 22;26:e57615. doi: 10.2196/57615.
7
Assessing the practice of data quality evaluation in a national clinical data research network through a systematic scoping review in the era of real-world data.在真实世界数据时代,通过系统的范围综述评估国家临床数据研究网络中的数据质量评估实践。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Dec 9;27(12):1999-2010. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa245.
8
Moving Towards an EHR Data Quality Framework: The MIRACUM Approach.迈向电子健康记录数据质量框架:MIRACUM方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Sep 3;267:247-253. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190834.
9
Initializing a hospital-wide data quality program. The AP-HP experience.启动全院范围的数据质量计划。AP-HP 的经验。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Nov;181:104804. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Data quality assessment in healthcare, dimensions, methods and tools: a systematic review.医疗保健中的数据质量评估:维度、方法与工具——一项系统综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03136-y.
2
A Standardized Guideline for Assessing Extracted Electronic Health Records Cohorts: A Scoping Review.评估提取的电子健康记录队列的标准化指南:一项范围综述。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2025 Jun 10;2025:527-536. eCollection 2025.
3
Challenges for Data Quality in the Clinical Data Life Cycle: Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
DQ-v: A Database-Agnostic Framework for Exploring Variability in Electronic Health Record Data Across Time and Site Location.DQ-v:一个与数据库无关的框架,用于探索电子健康记录数据随时间和地点的变异性。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 May 10;5(1):3. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1277.
2
A Data Quality Assessment Guideline for Electronic Health Record Data Reuse.电子健康记录数据复用的数据质量评估指南
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Sep 4;5(1):14. doi: 10.5334/egems.218.
3
A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data.
临床数据生命周期中数据质量面临的挑战:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 23;27:e60709. doi: 10.2196/60709.
4
Assessing ICD Data Quality and Its Impact on DRG Payments: Evidence from a Women and Children Special Hospital in China.评估ICD数据质量及其对DRG支付的影响:来自中国一家妇幼专科医院的证据。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2024 Jun 1;21(2):1b. eCollection 2024 Summer-Fall.
5
Investigation on the preferences for data quality assessment indicators of electronic health records: user-oriented perspective.电子健康记录数据质量评估指标的偏好调查:以用户为导向的视角
JAMIA Open. 2024 Dec 11;7(4):ooae142. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae142. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Systematic data quality assessment of electronic health record data to evaluate study-specific fitness: Report from the PRESERVE research study.电子健康记录数据的系统数据质量评估以评估特定研究适用性:PRESERVE研究报告
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Jun 27;3(6):e0000527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000527. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
An active human role is essential in big data-led decisions and data-intensive science.在大数据驱动的决策和数据密集型科学中,人的积极作用至关重要。
F1000Res. 2021 Nov 8;10:1127. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.73876.1. eCollection 2021.
8
Targeted Data Quality Analysis for a Clinical Decision Support System for SIRS Detection in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.针对危重症儿科患者 SIRS 检测的临床决策支持系统的数据质量分析
Methods Inf Med. 2023 Jun;62(S 01):e1-e9. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1760238. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
9
Rare Diseases in Hospital Information Systems-An Interoperable Methodology for Distributed Data Quality Assessments.医院信息系统中的罕见病——分布式数据质量评估的可互操作方法。
Methods Inf Med. 2023 Sep;62(3-04):71-89. doi: 10.1055/a-2006-1018. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
10
Developing a Data Quality Standard Primer for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment from Electronic Health Record Data Using the DataGauge Process.利用 DataGauge 流程从电子健康记录数据中开发心血管风险评估数据质量标准入门。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:388-397. eCollection 2021.
电子健康记录数据二次使用的统一数据质量评估术语和框架。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Sep 11;4(1):1244. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1244. eCollection 2016.
4
Quality of EHR data extractions for studies of preterm birth in a tertiary care center: guidelines for obtaining reliable data.三级医疗中心早产研究中电子健康记录(EHR)数据提取的质量:获取可靠数据的指南
BMC Pediatr. 2016 Apr 29;16:59. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0592-z.
5
Data quality assessment framework to assess electronic medical record data for use in research.用于评估电子病历数据以供研究使用的数据质量评估框架。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jun;90:40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
6
Application of An Ontology for Characterizing Data Quality For a Secondary Use of EHR Data.一种用于表征电子健康记录(EHR)数据二次使用的数据质量的本体的应用。
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Feb 10;7(1):69-88. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-08-RA-0107. eCollection 2016.
7
A Data Quality Ontology for the Secondary Use of EHR Data.用于电子健康记录(EHR)数据二次利用的数据质量本体论。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:1937-46. eCollection 2015.
8
Rediscovering drug side effects: the impact of analytical assumptions on the detection of associations in EHR data.重新发现药物副作用:分析假设对电子健康记录(EHR)数据中关联检测的影响。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2015 Mar 25;2015:51-5. eCollection 2015.
9
Transparent reporting of data quality in distributed data networks.分布式数据网络中数据质量的透明报告。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015 Mar 23;3(1):1052. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1052. eCollection 2015.
10
Reuse of clinical data.临床数据的再利用。
Yearb Med Inform. 2014 Aug 15;9(1):52-4. doi: 10.15265/IY-2014-0013.