Child Study Center.
Division of Social and Behavioral Research, National Institute on Aging.
Dev Psychol. 2019 Oct;55(10):2203-2218. doi: 10.1037/dev0000780. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
Epidemiological evidence links exposure to early life adversities-such as childhood maltreatment-with impaired health and well-being in adulthood. Since these effects are usually unrecognized or untreated in childhood, preventive and remediating interventions in adults are needed. Our focus on adulthood prompted three major questions. First, does our increased understanding of mechanisms accounting for the long-term effects of early life adversities help delineate underlying dimensions that underscore key similarities and differences among these adversities? Second, can adults accurately report on adversities they experienced in childhood? Third, can we identify malleable risk processes in adulthood that might be targets for preventive intervention? Supported by the National Institute on Aging, the U.K. Economic and Social and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councils, a network of researchers in human and animal development addressed these questions through meetings and literature review. A small number of dimensions may adequately distinguish among a range of co-occurring childhood adversities. Widely used adult ascertainments of childhood adversity are poorly related to prospective ascertainment. Strategies for preventive interventions should be aimed both at adults who were actually exposed to adversity as well as those who recall adversity, but the targeted risk processes may be different. Now is an opportune time to support research on adult interventions based on unfolding research on critical periods of sensitivity to adversity in fetal and child development, on improved understanding of risk mechanisms that may persist across the life span, and on new insights on enhancing neuroplasticity in adults. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
流行病学证据表明,暴露于早期生活逆境中,如儿童期虐待,会导致成年后健康和幸福感受损。由于这些影响在儿童期通常未被识别或未得到治疗,因此需要在成年人中进行预防和补救干预。我们对成年人的关注引发了三个主要问题。首先,我们对解释早期生活逆境长期影响的机制的理解增加,是否有助于描绘出突显这些逆境之间关键相似性和差异性的潜在维度?其次,成年人能否准确报告他们在儿童时期经历的逆境?第三,我们能否确定成年人中可改变的风险过程,这些过程可能是预防干预的目标?在国家老龄化研究所、英国经济和社会研究委员会以及生物技术和生物科学研究理事会的支持下,一个由人类和动物发展方面的研究人员组成的网络通过会议和文献综述来解决这些问题。少数几个维度可能足以区分一系列同时发生的儿童逆境。广泛使用的成人逆境确定方法与前瞻性确定方法相关性较差。预防干预策略应针对实际经历过逆境的成年人以及那些回忆起逆境的成年人,但目标风险过程可能不同。现在是支持基于胎儿和儿童发展中对逆境敏感性的关键时期研究、对可能贯穿整个生命周期的风险机制的理解以及对增强成年人神经可塑性的新见解的成人干预研究的恰当时机。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。