Kuhlmann Emily Hope, Conrad Amy Lynn
Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Mar;57(3):310-320. doi: 10.1177/1055665619867015. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
To examine word reading performance between boys with isolated cleft lip and/or palate (iCL/P), unaffected average reading (uAR), and unaffected impaired reading (uIR), using the dual-route model.
Case/control study.
University children's hospital.
Males, between the ages of 8 to 11 years, with iCL/P (n = 26), uIR (n = 33), or uAR (n = 28).
Single word reading and achievement were evaluated. Analyses of variance and analyses of covariance evaluated group differences in achievement. Medical records were reviewed for iCL/P participants for audiology and speech history. Spearman ρ correlations were calculated between hearing, speech, and reading achievement for the iCL/P group.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Reading performance was evaluated using select subscales from the and the .
Participants with iCL/P had higher than expected rates of reading impairment, differing across cleft type (0% iCL, 50% isolated cleft lip and palate [iCLP], 71.4% isolated cleft palate only [iCP]). On measures of word reading accuracy, iCL/P participants outscored uIR participants, with uAR participants scoring the highest. This pattern was specific to nonlexical reading tasks. Participants in the uAR and iCL/P groups outscored uIR participants on lexical tasks, with no significant differences between uAR and iCL/P. Evaluation of speech and hearing revealed no significant relationship to single word reading or achievement measures in the iCL/P group.
Boys with iCL/P are at a higher risk of reading impairments, particularly within the iCP subset. Regular screening should be encouraged, with skills from lexical and nonlexical routes assessed.
运用双通道模型,研究单纯唇裂和/或腭裂(iCL/P)男孩、未受影响的正常阅读者(uAR)以及未受影响的阅读障碍者(uIR)之间的单词阅读表现。
病例对照研究。
大学儿童医院。
年龄在8至11岁之间的男性,包括iCL/P患者(n = 26)、uIR患者(n = 33)或uAR患者(n = 28)。
评估单字阅读和学业成绩。方差分析和协方差分析评估学业成绩的组间差异。查阅iCL/P参与者的病历,了解其听力和言语史。计算iCL/P组听力、言语和阅读成绩之间的Spearman ρ相关性。
使用[具体量表名称1]和[具体量表名称2]的选定子量表评估阅读表现。
iCL/P参与者的阅读障碍发生率高于预期,不同腭裂类型存在差异(单纯唇裂为0%,单纯唇腭裂[iCLP]为50%,仅单纯腭裂[iCP]为71.4%)。在单词阅读准确性测量中,iCL/P参与者得分高于uIR参与者,uAR参与者得分最高。这种模式特定于非词汇阅读任务。在词汇任务中,uAR组和iCL/P组参与者得分高于uIR参与者,uAR组和iCL/P组之间无显著差异。对言语和听力的评估显示,iCL/P组中言语和听力与单字阅读或学业成绩测量无显著关系。
iCL/P男孩存在阅读障碍的风险更高,尤其是在iCP亚组中。应鼓励进行定期筛查,评估词汇和非词汇途径的技能。