Faculty of Health Science, School of Public Health, Curtin University GPO Box U1987, Perth Western 6845, Australia.
College of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5000, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 1;16(15):2749. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152749.
Inadequate social protection, stagnant wages, unemployment, and homelessness are associated with Australian household food insecurity. Little is known about the recipients of food charity and whether their needs are being met. This cross-sectional study of 101 food charity recipients in Perth, Western Australia, measured food security, weight status, sociodemographic characteristics and food acquisition practices. Seventy-nine percent were male, aged 21-79 years, 90% were unemployed, 87% received social assistance payments, and 38% were homeless. Ninety-one percent were food insecure, 80% with hunger, and 56% had gone a day or more without eating in the previous week. Fifty-seven percent had used food charity for ≥1 year, and, of those, 7.5 years was the mode. Charitable services were the main food source in the previous week, however 76% used multiple sources. Begging for money for food (36%), begging for food (32%), stealing food or beverages (34%), and taking food from bins (28%) was commonplace. The omnipresence and chronicity of food insecurity, reliance on social security payments, and risky food acquisition suggest that both the social protection and charitable food systems are failing. Urgent reforms are needed to address the determinants of food insecurity (e.g., increased social assistance payments, employment and housing support) and the adequacy, appropriateness and effectiveness of food charity.
社会保障不足、工资停滞、失业和无家可归与澳大利亚家庭的粮食不安全有关。人们对食品慈善机构的受助者知之甚少,也不知道他们的需求是否得到了满足。本研究对西澳大利亚州珀斯的 101 名食品慈善机构受助者进行了横断面研究,测量了粮食安全、体重状况、社会人口特征和粮食获取行为。79%为男性,年龄在 21-79 岁之间,90%失业,87%领取社会救助金,38%无家可归。91%的人粮食不安全,80%有饥饿感,56%在上周有一天或以上没有进食。57%的人使用食品慈善机构≥1 年,其中 7.5 年为模式。慈善服务是前一周的主要食物来源,但 76%的人使用多种来源。讨钱买食物(36%)、讨食物(32%)、偷食物或饮料(34%)和从垃圾桶里拿食物(28%)是很常见的。粮食不安全的普遍存在和长期性、对社会保障金的依赖以及危险的粮食获取方式表明,社会保障和慈善食品系统都存在失败。需要进行紧急改革,以解决粮食不安全的决定因素(例如,增加社会援助金、就业和住房支持)以及食品慈善的充足性、适当性和有效性。