Suppr超能文献

多份胎盘的深度微生物分析均未发现胎盘微生物组的证据。

Deep microbial analysis of multiple placentas shows no evidence for a placental microbiome.

机构信息

Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel.

Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel.

出版信息

BJOG. 2020 Jan;127(2):159-169. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15896. Epub 2019 Aug 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To resolve the controversy regarding the presence of a microbiota in the placenta.

DESIGN

Classical and molecular microbiological study.

SETTING

All samples were collected during caesarean section.

POPULATION

A total of 28 human placentas and six murine placentas.

METHODS

All 28 human placentas were checked for 16S rRNA gene amplification products. Three locations from four selected human placentas and three 'environmental controls' for each placenta were placed in seven culture media. The four selected human placentas were further analysed using Gram stain, immunohistochemistry for bacteria, electron microscopy, and TaqMan RT-qPCR. Six placentas from three SPF mice were cut into four pieces each, and further analysed for 16S rRNA gene amplification.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Microbiological and molecular evidence of bacteria.

RESULTS

None of the placental cultures used for the full analysis, or their environmental cultures, was positive for bacterial growth. None of the other methods showed any evidence of bacteria. Immunohistochemistry showed negligible bacterial counts. None of the murine placentas showed evidence of 16S rRNA gene amplification.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support that the fetal environment in the womb is sterile. Based on the immunohistochemistry and the limit of detection of the other methods used, if a placental microbiome exists, it is of extreme low biomass, and thus its effect on clinical phenotypes is probably minor, if it exists at all.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Using several microbiological and molecular methods in parallel, we found no compelling evidence of bacteria in human and mouse placentas.

摘要

目的

解决胎盘存在微生物群的争议。

设计

经典和分子微生物学研究。

地点

所有样本均在剖宫产期间采集。

人群

共 28 个人类胎盘和 6 个鼠类胎盘。

方法

检查 28 个人类胎盘的 16S rRNA 基因扩增产物。从 4 个人类胎盘中选择的 3 个位置和每个胎盘的 3 个“环境对照”被放置在 7 种培养基中。对 4 个人类胎盘进一步进行细菌革兰氏染色、免疫组化、电子显微镜和 TaqMan RT-qPCR 分析。将 3 只 SPF 小鼠的 6 个胎盘切成每块 4 份,进一步分析 16S rRNA 基因扩增。

主要观察指标

细菌的微生物学和分子证据。

结果

未在用于全面分析的胎盘培养物或其环境培养物中发现细菌生长阳性。其他方法均未显示任何细菌证据。免疫组化显示细菌计数可忽略不计。鼠类胎盘均未显示 16S rRNA 基因扩增的证据。

结论

我们的结果支持胎儿在子宫内的环境是无菌的。根据免疫组化和其他方法的检测限,如果胎盘微生物组存在,其生物量极低,因此如果存在的话,其对临床表型的影响可能很小。

推文摘要

我们使用几种微生物学和分子方法并行研究,在人类和鼠类胎盘均未发现有说服力的细菌证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验