Research Center for Computer Science and Information Technology, Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Bul. Krste Misirkov 2, 1000, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Research Center for Computer Science and Information Technology, Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Bul. Krste Misirkov 2, 1000, Skopje, North Macedonia.
J Neurosci Methods. 2019 Oct 1;326:108373. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108373. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
Standard segmentation of high-contrast electron micrographs (EM) identifies myelin accurately but does not translate easily into measurements of individual axons and their myelin, even in cross-sections of parallel fibers. We describe automated segmentation and measurement of each myelinated axon and its sheath in EMs of arbitrarily oriented human white matter from autopsies.
Preliminary segmentation of myelin, axons and background by machine learning, using selected filters, precedes automated correction of systematic errors. Final segmentation is done by a deep neural network (DNN). Automated measurement of each putative fiber rejects measures encountering pre-defined artifacts and excludes fibers failing to satisfy pre-defined conditions.
Improved segmentation of three sets of 30 annotated images each (two sets from human prefrontal white matter and one from human optic nerve) is achieved with a DNN trained only with a subset of the first set from prefrontal white matter. Total number of myelinated axons identified by the DNN differed from expert segmentation by 0.2%, 2.9%, and -5.1%, respectively. G-ratios differed by 2.96%, 0.74% and 2.83%. Intraclass correlation coefficients between DNN and annotated segmentation were mostly >0.9, indicating nearly interchangeable performance.
COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Measurement-oriented studies of arbitrarily oriented fibers from central white matter are rare. Published methods are typically applied to cross-sections of fascicles and measure aggregated areas of myelin sheaths and axons, allowing estimation only of average g-ratio.
Automated segmentation and measurement of axons and myelin is complex. We report a feasible approach that has so far proven comparable to manual segmentation.
标准的高对比度电子显微镜 (EM) 分割方法可以准确地识别髓鞘,但在平行纤维的横截面中,它不容易转化为对单个轴突及其髓鞘的测量。我们描述了一种自动化的分割和测量方法,可以在尸检中任意方向的人类大脑白质的 EM 中对每个有髓轴突及其鞘进行分割和测量。
使用选定的滤波器,通过机器学习对髓鞘、轴突和背景进行初步分割,然后自动纠正系统误差。最终的分割是通过深度神经网络 (DNN) 完成的。对每个假定纤维的自动测量会拒绝遇到预定义伪影的测量值,并排除不符合预定义条件的纤维。
通过仅使用来自前额叶白质的第一组子集训练的 DNN,对三组各 30 张注释图像(两组来自人类前额叶白质,一组来自人类视神经)进行了改进的分割。DNN 识别的有髓轴突总数与专家分割相差 0.2%、2.9%和-5.1%。G-比分别相差 2.96%、0.74%和 2.83%。DNN 和注释分割之间的组内相关系数大多大于 0.9,表明性能几乎可以互换。
对来自中枢白质的任意方向纤维的面向测量的研究很少。已发表的方法通常应用于束的横截面,测量髓鞘和轴突的聚合面积,只能估计平均 G-比。
轴突和髓鞘的自动分割和测量非常复杂。我们报告了一种可行的方法,迄今为止,该方法已被证明可与手动分割相媲美。