Suppr超能文献

血液透析中不安腿综合征诊断的筛查问题

Screening questions for the diagnosis of restless legs syndrome in hemodialysis.

作者信息

Collister David, Rodrigues Jennifer C, Mazzetti Andrea, Salisbury Kelsi, Morosin Laura, Rabbat Christian, Brimble K Scott, Walsh Michael

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Kidney J. 2018 Dec 24;12(4):559-563. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfy129. eCollection 2019 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is common in end-stage renal disease and is associated with reduced health-related quality of life. Simple and accurate screening instruments are needed since RLS is underdiagnosed and treatable. We examined the operating characteristics of screening questions and a disease-specific measurement tool for the diagnosis of RLS in hemodialysis.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of prevalent adult hemodialysis patients in Hamilton, Canada. The diagnosis of RLS was made using the 2012 Revised International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) criteria. All participants received three screening instruments: (i) a single screening question for RLS derived from a nondialysis population; (ii) a single question from the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS); and (iii) the IRLSSG Rating Scale (IRLS). All instruments were compared with the reference standard using logistic regression from which receiver operating characteristics curves were generated. Cutoffs associated with maximum performance were identified.

RESULTS

We recruited 50 participants with a mean (SD) age of 64 (12.4) years, of whom 52% were male and 92% were on three times weekly hemodialysis. Using the reference standard, 14 (28%) had a diagnosis of RLS. The single screening question for RLS had an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.72 with a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 58.3%. An ESAS cutoff of ≥1 had the highest AUROC at 0.65 with a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 56%. An IRLS cutoff of ≥20 had the highest AUROC at 0.75 with a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 81%.

CONCLUSION

IRLS had better specificity than the single question or ESAS for the diagnosis of RLS.

摘要

背景

不安腿综合征(RLS)在终末期肾病中很常见,且与健康相关生活质量下降有关。由于RLS诊断不足且可治疗,因此需要简单准确的筛查工具。我们研究了用于血液透析中RLS诊断的筛查问题和疾病特异性测量工具的操作特征。

方法

我们对加拿大汉密尔顿的成年血液透析患者进行了一项队列研究。采用2012年修订的国际不安腿综合征研究组(IRLSSG)标准对RLS进行诊断。所有参与者都接受了三种筛查工具:(i)一个源自非透析人群的RLS单筛问题;(ii)埃德蒙顿症状评估系统(ESAS)中的一个问题;(iii)IRLSSG评分量表(IRLS)。使用逻辑回归将所有工具与参考标准进行比较,从中生成受试者操作特征曲线。确定与最佳性能相关的临界值。

结果

我们招募了50名参与者,平均(标准差)年龄为64(12.4)岁,其中52%为男性,92%每周进行三次血液透析。根据参考标准,14名(28%)被诊断为RLS。RLS的单筛问题在受试者操作曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.72,敏感性为85.7%,特异性为58.3%。ESAS临界值≥1时AUROC最高,为0.65,敏感性为79%,特异性为56%。IRLS临界值≥20时AUROC最高,为0.75,敏感性为71%,特异性为81%。

结论

在RLS诊断方面,IRLS比单筛问题或ESAS具有更好的特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验