• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭在线灾害准备材料的读写能力需求评估。

An Evaluation of the Literacy Demands of Online Natural Disaster Preparedness Materials for Families.

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Atlanta, GA.

University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.

出版信息

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 Aug;14(4):449-458. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2019.62. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1017/dmp.2019.62
PMID:31385571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7002173/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Natural disasters are becoming increasingly common, but it is unclear whether families can comprehend and use available resources to prepare for such emergencies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the literacy demands of risk communication materials on natural disasters for US families with children.

METHODS

In January 2018, we assessed 386 online self-directed learning resources related to emergency preparedness for natural disasters using 5 literacy assessment tools. Assessment scores were compared by information source, audience type, and disaster type.

RESULTS

One-in-three websites represented government institutions, and 3/4 were written for a general audience. Nearly 1-in-5 websites did not specify a disaster type. Assessment scores suggest a mismatch between the general population's literacy levels and literacy demands of materials in the areas of readability, complexity, suitability, web usability, and overall audience appropriateness. Materials required more years of education beyond the grade level recommended by prominent health organizations. Resources for caregivers of children generally and children with special health care needs possessed lower literacy demands than materials overall, for most assessment tools.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk communication and public health agencies could better align the literacy demands of emergency preparedness materials with the literacy capabilities of the general public.

摘要

目的

自然灾害越来越频繁,但目前尚不清楚家庭是否能够理解并利用现有资源为这类突发事件做准备。本研究旨在评估针对美国家庭(有孩子)的自然灾害应急准备风险沟通材料的文化程度要求。

方法

2018 年 1 月,我们使用 5 种文化程度评估工具,对 386 个在线自学资源进行评估,这些资源与自然灾害应急准备有关。根据信息来源、受众类型和灾害类型对评估得分进行比较。

结果

三分之一的网站代表政府机构,四分之三的网站面向普通受众。近五分之一的网站没有指定灾害类型。评估得分表明,在可阅读性、复杂性、适宜性、网络可用性和总体受众适宜性等方面,材料的文化程度要求与普通民众的文化程度水平不匹配。与知名健康组织推荐的年级水平相比,材料需要超出规定年级水平的受教育年限。对于大多数评估工具来说,针对儿童照顾者的资源以及有特殊医疗需求的儿童的资源,其文化程度要求低于总体材料。

结论

风险沟通和公共卫生机构可以更好地使应急准备材料的文化程度要求与公众的文化程度能力相匹配。

相似文献

1
An Evaluation of the Literacy Demands of Online Natural Disaster Preparedness Materials for Families.家庭在线灾害准备材料的读写能力需求评估。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 Aug;14(4):449-458. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2019.62. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
2
Evaluation of online disaster and emergency preparedness resources.在线灾害与应急准备资源评估
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):438-46. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00006178.
3
An Evaluation of the Readability, Quality, and Content of Online Disaster Preparedness Materials for the Society.面向社会的在线灾难准备材料的可读性、质量和内容评估
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2024 Dec 10;18:e304. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2024.310.
4
The Relationship Between Disaster Literacy and Disaster Preparedness in Community: After Earthquake Study.社区中灾害素养与灾害准备的关系:地震后研究
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2025 Mar 6;19:e51. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2025.48.
5
Disaster Preparedness among Active Duty Personnel, Retirees, Veterans, and Dependents.现役军人、退休人员、退伍军人及其家属的灾难准备情况。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Apr;31(2):132-40. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000157. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
6
Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration.针对年龄相关性黄斑变性患者设计的在线患者教育材料评估。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01664-x.
7
The development of disaster preparedness education for public: a scoping review.公众灾害防范教育的发展:一项范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 17;25(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21664-0.
8
Lung cancer screening: assessment of health literacy and readability of online educational resources.肺癌筛查:在线教育资源的健康素养和可读性评估。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 7;18(1):1356. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6278-8.
9
Online resources for strabismus: an evaluation of readability, complexity, and suitability.斜视的在线资源:可读性、复杂性和适用性评估
Strabismus. 2025 Mar;33(1):36-43. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2024.2408029. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
10
A proposed disaster literacy model.一个提议的灾害素养模型。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014 Jun;8(3):267-275. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2014.43.

引用本文的文献

1
Communication in disasters to support families with children with medical complexity and special healthcare needs: a rapid scoping review.灾难中的沟通对支持有医疗复杂性和特殊医疗需求的儿童的家庭:快速范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 13;12:1229738. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1229738. eCollection 2024.
2
Organizational Health Literacy as a Tool for Health Equity: Application in a High-Risk Infant Follow-Up Program.组织健康素养作为促进健康公平的工具:在高危婴儿随访项目中的应用
Children (Basel). 2023 Oct 6;10(10):1658. doi: 10.3390/children10101658.
3
Children and Adolescents with Disabilities and Exposure to Disasters, Terrorism, and the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Scoping Review.残疾儿童和青少年与灾害、恐怖主义和 COVID-19 大流行的暴露:范围综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2021 Oct 13;23(12):80. doi: 10.1007/s11920-021-01295-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The Disaster Information Needs of Families of Children with Special Healthcare Needs: A Scoping Review.《有特殊医疗需求儿童家庭的灾害信息需求:范围综述》。
Health Secur. 2018 May/Jun;16(3):178-192. doi: 10.1089/hs.2018.0007. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
2
Addressing Children's Needs in Disasters: A Regional Pediatric Tabletop Exercise.应对灾害中的儿童需求:一次区域儿科桌面演练
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Oct;12(5):582-586. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2017.137. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
3
A Child's Health Is the Public's Health: Progress and Gaps in Addressing Pediatric Needs in Public Health Emergencies.儿童健康关乎公众健康:应对突发公共卫生事件中儿科需求的进展与差距
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(S2):S134-S137. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303950.
4
A Conceptual Framework for the Evaluation of Emergency Risk Communications.应急风险沟通评估的概念框架
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(S2):S208-S214. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304040.
5
The Importance of Self-Efficacy in Parental Emergency Preparedness: A Moderated Mediation Model.自我效能感在家长应急准备中的重要性:一个有调节的中介模型。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Jun;12(3):345-351. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2017.80. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
6
Ensuring the Health of Children in Disasters.保障受灾儿童的健康。
Pediatrics. 2015 Nov;136(5):e1407-17. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3112. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
7
Communicating public health preparedness information to pregnant and postpartum women: an assessment of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention web pages.向孕妇和产后妇女传达公共卫生防范信息:对疾病控制与预防中心网页的评估
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015 Apr;9(2):134-7. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2015.2.
8
A proposed disaster literacy model.一个提议的灾害素养模型。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014 Jun;8(3):267-275. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2014.43.
9
The CDC Clear Communication Index is a new evidence-based tool to prepare and review health information.美国疾病控制与预防中心清晰沟通指数是一种基于证据的新工具,用于编写和审核健康信息。
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Sep;15(5):629-37. doi: 10.1177/1524839914538969. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
10
Communications in public health emergency preparedness: a systematic review of the literature.突发公共卫生事件应急准备中的沟通:文献系统综述
Biosecur Bioterror. 2013 Sep;11(3):170-84. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2013.0038.