• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌筛查:在线教育资源的健康素养和可读性评估。

Lung cancer screening: assessment of health literacy and readability of online educational resources.

机构信息

University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S. Wood St., CSB 915, MC 719, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.

University of Illinois College of Pharmacy, 463 Westside Research Office Bldg. 1747 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 7;18(1):1356. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6278-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-018-6278-8
PMID:30526544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6286598/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer screening can reduce mortality but can be a complex, multi-step process. Poor health literacy is associated with unfavorable outcomes and decreased use of preventative services, so it is important to address barriers to care through efficient and practical education. The readability of lung cancer screening materials for patients is unknown and may not be at the recommended 6th grade reading level set by the American Medical Association. Our goals were to: (1) measure the health literacy of a lung cancer screening population from an urban academic medical center, and (2) examine the readability of online educational materials for lung cancer screening.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cross sectional study at a single urban academic center. Health literacy was assessed using three validated screening questions. To assess the readability of educational materials, we performed a Google search using the phrase, "What is lung cancer screening?" and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) formula was used to estimate the grade level required to understand the text.

RESULTS

There were 404 patients who underwent lung cancer screening during the study period. The prevalence of inadequate/marginal health literacy was 26.7-38.0%. Fifty websites were reviewed and four were excluded from analysis because they were intended for medical providers. The mean FKGL for the 46 websites combined was 10.6 ± 2.2.

CONCLUSIONS

Low health literacy was common and is likely a barrier to appropriate education for lung cancer screening. The current online educational materials regarding lung cancer screening are written above the recommended reading level set by the American Medical Association.

摘要

背景

肺癌筛查可以降低死亡率,但过程可能较为复杂,步骤繁多。健康素养差与不良结局和预防性服务使用率降低有关,因此,通过高效实用的教育来解决护理障碍非常重要。肺癌筛查患者的材料可读性尚不清楚,可能未达到美国医学协会设定的 6 年级阅读水平。我们的目标是:(1)测量城市学术医疗中心肺癌筛查人群的健康素养,(2)检查肺癌筛查在线教育材料的可读性。

方法

我们在一家城市学术中心进行了回顾性横断面研究。使用三个经过验证的筛选问题来评估健康素养。为了评估教育材料的可读性,我们使用短语“什么是肺癌筛查?”进行了谷歌搜索,并使用弗莱什-金凯德等级(FKGL)公式来估计理解文本所需的等级水平。

结果

在研究期间,共有 404 名患者接受了肺癌筛查。健康素养不足/边缘的患病率为 26.7-38.0%。共审查了 50 个网站,其中 4 个因针对医疗提供者而被排除在分析之外。46 个网站的平均 FKGL 为 10.6±2.2。

结论

低健康素养很常见,可能是肺癌筛查适当教育的障碍。当前关于肺癌筛查的在线教育材料的书写水平高于美国医学协会设定的推荐阅读水平。

相似文献

1
Lung cancer screening: assessment of health literacy and readability of online educational resources.肺癌筛查:在线教育资源的健康素养和可读性评估。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 7;18(1):1356. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6278-8.
2
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
3
Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.基于网络的结直肠癌筛查患者教育材料的可读性、适宜性和健康内容评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
4
Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R): A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.物理医学与康复(PM&R)患者教育材料的可读性:一项比较性横断面研究。
PM R. 2020 Apr;12(4):368-373. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12230. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
5
Health Literacy: Readability of ACC/AHA Online Patient Education Material.健康素养:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会在线患者教育资料的可读性
Cardiology. 2017;138(1):36-40. doi: 10.1159/000475881. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
6
The readability of psychosocial wellness patient resources: improving surgical outcomes.心理社会健康患者资源的可读性:改善手术效果。
J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.033. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
7
Readability of online patient education materials for parents after a failed newborn hearing screen.新生儿听力筛查未通过后提供给家长的在线患者教育材料的可读性
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;125:168-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
8
Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.肺癌相关在线资源的可读性分析
J Surg Res. 2016 Nov;206(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
9
Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.在线眼科患者信息的可读性评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;131(12):1610-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5521.
10
Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website.美国运动医学学会网站上患者教育材料的可读性。
Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Nov;42(4):125-30. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.11.2099.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision Medicine in Lung Cancer Screening: A Paradigm Shift in Early Detection-Precision Screening for Lung Cancer.肺癌筛查中的精准医学:早期检测的范式转变——肺癌精准筛查
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 19;15(12):1562. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121562.
2
Association of health literacy with cancer survival: a single-centre prospective cohort study.健康素养与癌症生存率的关联:一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Oncol. 2025 Apr 2;64:499-506. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42557.
3
Improving lung cancer decision-making using a conversation tool (iDECIDE): a stepped wedge pragmatic clinical trial.使用对话工具(iDECIDE)改善肺癌决策:一项阶梯楔形实用临床试验。
Future Oncol. 2025 Apr;21(9):1045-1056. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2475733. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
4
Hospital-to-Home Transitions for Lung Cancer Patients-A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Professionals' Experiences.肺癌患者从医院到家庭的过渡——对医护人员经历的定性研究
Nurs Open. 2025 Feb;12(2):e70143. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70143.
5
A study protocol for a mixed-method environmental scan of contextual factors that influence lung cancer screening adherence.一项关于影响肺癌筛查依从性的背景因素的混合方法环境扫描的研究方案。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Nov 6;5(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00658-w.
6
The Use of Podcasts as Patient Preparation for Hospital Visits-An Interview Study Exploring Patients' Experiences.Podcasts 用于患者就诊前准备的使用情况:一项探索患者体验的访谈研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;21(6):746. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060746.
7
Social and Biological Determinants in Lung Cancer Disparity.肺癌差异中的社会和生物学决定因素。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 31;16(3):612. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030612.
8
Evaluation of the usability, content, readability and cultural appropriateness of online alcohol and other drugs resources for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples in New South Wales, Australia.评价澳大利亚新南威尔士州针对原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的在线酒精和其他药物资源的可用性、内容、可读性和文化适宜性。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 10;13(5):e069756. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069756.
9
Impact of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force lung cancer screening update on drivers of disparities in screening eligibility.美国预防服务工作组肺癌筛查更新对筛查资格差异驱动因素的影响。
Cancer Med. 2023 Feb;12(4):4647-4654. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5066. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
10
Readability Assessment of HPV Vaccination and Cervical Cancer Information: A Systematic Scoping Review.人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种与宫颈癌信息的可读性评估:一项系统性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Sep 22;9(10):1246. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9101246.

本文引用的文献

1
Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines: How Readable Are Internet-Based Patient Education Resources?肺癌筛查指南:基于互联网的患者教育资源的可读性如何?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jul;211(1):W42-W46. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19042. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
2
Opinions, practice patterns, and perceived barriers to lung cancer screening among attending and resident primary care physicians.在职和住院初级保健医生对肺癌筛查的看法、实践模式及感知到的障碍。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2018 Jan 22;10:189-195. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S143152. eCollection 2017.
3
Screening for Lung Cancer: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.肺癌筛查:CHEST 指南和专家小组报告。
Chest. 2018 Apr;153(4):954-985. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
4
Pulmonary Nodules: A Small Problem for Many, Severe Distress for Some, and How to Communicate About It.肺部结节:对许多人来说是小问题,对一些人来说却是严重困扰,以及如何对此进行沟通。
Chest. 2018 Apr;153(4):1004-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
5
An Assessment of Primary Care and Pulmonary Provider Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening.初级保健和肺部提供者对肺癌筛查的看法评估。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Jan;15(1):69-75. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201705-392OC.
6
A qualitative analysis of smokers' perceptions about lung cancer screening.吸烟者对肺癌筛查认知的定性分析
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 21;17(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4496-0.
7
Barriers to Clinical Trial Enrollment in Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Cancer.癌症种族和少数民族患者临床试验入组的障碍
Cancer Control. 2016 Oct;23(4):327-337. doi: 10.1177/107327481602300404.
8
Impact of a Lung Cancer Screening Counseling and Shared Decision-Making Visit.肺癌筛查咨询与共同决策就诊的影响
Chest. 2017 Mar;151(3):572-578. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.027. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
9
Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. A Qualitative Study.初级保健提供者和患者对肺癌筛查的看法。定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Nov;13(11):1977-1982. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-286OC.
10
Patients' Attitudes Regarding Lung Cancer Screening and Decision Aids. A Survey and Focus Group Study.患者对肺癌筛查和决策辅助工具的态度。一项调查和焦点小组研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Nov;13(11):1992-2001. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-289OC.