Roell Mareike, Mahler Hubert, Lienhard Johannes, Gehring Dominic, Gollhofer Albert, Roecker Kai
Institute of Sports and Sports Science (IfSS), Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Schwarzwaldstraße 175, 79117 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Sport-Club Freiburg e.V., Schwarzwaldstraße 193, 79117 Freiburg, Germany.
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Aug 7;19(16):3458. doi: 10.3390/s19163458.
The aim of this study was to determine possible influences, including data processing and sport-specific demands, on the validity of acceleration measures by an inertial measurement unit (IMU) in indoor environments. IMU outputs were compared to a three-dimensional (3D) motion analysis (MA) system and processed with two sensor fusion algorithms (Kalman filter, KF; Complementary filter, CF) at temporal resolutions of 100, 10, and 5 Hz. Athletes performed six team sport-specific movements whilst wearing a single IMU. Mean and peak acceleration magnitudes were analyzed. Over all trials ( = 1093), KF data overestimated MA resultant acceleration by 0.42 ± 0.31 m∙s for mean and 4.18 ± 3.68 m∙s for peak values, while CF processing showed errors of up to 0.57 ± 0.41 m∙s and -2.31 ± 2.25 m∙s, respectively. Resampling to 5 Hz decreased the absolute error by about 14% for mean and 56% for peak values. Still, higher acceleration magnitudes led to a large increase in error. These results indicate that IMUs can be used for assessing accelerations in indoor team sports with acceptable means. Application of a CF and resampling to 5 Hz is recommended. High-acceleration magnitudes impair validity to a large degree and should be interpreted with caution.
本研究的目的是确定包括数据处理和特定运动需求在内的可能影响因素,对室内环境中惯性测量单元(IMU)加速度测量有效性的影响。将IMU输出与三维(3D)运动分析(MA)系统进行比较,并使用两种传感器融合算法(卡尔曼滤波器,KF;互补滤波器,CF)在100、10和5Hz的时间分辨率下进行处理。运动员在佩戴单个IMU的情况下进行六项团队运动特定动作。分析了平均加速度和峰值加速度大小。在所有试验(n = 1093)中,KF数据平均高估MA合成加速度0.42±0.31m∙s,峰值高估4.18±3.68m∙s,而CF处理的误差分别高达0.57±0.41m∙s和 -2.31±2.25m∙s。重采样到5Hz后,平均误差绝对值降低约14%,峰值误差降低56%。然而,更高的加速度大小会导致误差大幅增加。这些结果表明,IMU可用于以可接受的方式评估室内团队运动中的加速度。建议应用CF并重采样到5Hz。高加速度大小在很大程度上会损害有效性,应谨慎解释。