Center for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Japan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Feb;35(2):225-232. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14825. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
It is unclear how adding an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent to immunomodulator (IM) treatment, as a step-up strategy, affects long-term outcomes in ulcerative colitis. This retrospective study investigated persistence associated with biologic anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents combined with IMs versus biologic monotherapy in patients with ulcerative colitis.
This was a longitudinal cohort study of patients in the Japan Medical Data Center claims database who had been newly prescribed infliximab or adalimumab as induction (completed) and maintenance (2010-2016). Biologic persistence (i.e. no switch/discontinuation during maintenance) was compared among patients prescribed biologic monotherapy (Bio) and those prescribed a biologic combined with an IM, as step-up (Bio + prior IM) or simultaneously (Bio + IM).
Three hundred and sixty-nine eligible patients were analyzed (233, 78, and 58 in the Bio, Bio + prior IM, and Bio + IM subgroups, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed a lower probability of nonpersistence during maintenance for infliximab-treated patients in the Bio + prior IM versus Bio subgroup (hazard ratio: 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.99; P = 0.045). No such effect was seen in adalimumab-treated patients (P = 0.222) or in the overall population (P = 0.398). The probability of nonpersistence during maintenance in the Bio + IM subgroup was not significantly different from that in the Bio subgroup in either the biologic subpopulation or in the overall population.
Adding infliximab to an existing IM results in a lower probability of nonpersistence compared with infliximab monotherapy in ulcerative colitis patients. This effect is not seen in adalimumab-treated patients.
尚不清楚在溃疡性结肠炎患者中,作为升级策略,加用肿瘤坏死因子-α拮抗剂(anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent)联合免疫调节剂(immunomodulator,IM)治疗对长期结局的影响。本回顾性研究调查了在溃疡性结肠炎患者中,与生物性肿瘤坏死因子-α拮抗剂单药治疗相比,生物性肿瘤坏死因子-α拮抗剂联合 IM 治疗的药物持续使用情况。
这是一项在日本医疗数据中心索赔数据库中进行的纵向队列研究,纳入了新处方英夫利昔单抗或阿达木单抗进行诱导(完成)和维持(2010-2016 年)的患者。比较了生物性单药治疗(Bio)、生物性联合 IM 治疗(作为升级治疗策略:Bio+先前的 IM;或同时治疗:Bio+IM)患者的生物性药物持续使用(即维持期无转换/停药)情况。
共纳入 369 例符合条件的患者(Bio 组 233 例,Bio+先前的 IM 组 78 例,Bio+IM 组 58 例)。多变量分析显示,与 Bio 组相比,在英夫利昔单抗治疗的患者中,Bio+先前的 IM 组维持期非持续治疗的可能性较低(风险比:0.53;95%置信区间:0.29-0.99;P=0.045)。阿达木单抗治疗的患者(P=0.222)或总体人群(P=0.398)中未观察到这种效果。在生物制剂亚组或总体人群中,Bio+IM 组的维持期非持续治疗的可能性与 Bio 组无显著差异。
与英夫利昔单抗单药治疗相比,在溃疡性结肠炎患者中加用英夫利昔单抗联合现有 IM 治疗可降低非持续治疗的可能性。这一效果在阿达木单抗治疗的患者中并未见到。