• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Text messaging to engage friends/family in diabetes self-management support: acceptability and potential to address disparities.短信互动以促使朋友/家人参与糖尿病自我管理支持:可接受性以及解决差异的潜力。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):1099-1108. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz091.
2
User Engagement Among Diverse Adults in a 12-Month Text Message-Delivered Diabetes Support Intervention: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.12 个月短信传递式糖尿病支持干预中不同成年人的用户参与度:一项随机对照试验的结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 21;8(7):e17534. doi: 10.2196/17534.
3
Rationale, design, and recruitment outcomes for the Family/Friend Activation to Motivate Self-care (FAMS) 2.0 randomized controlled trial among adults with type 2 diabetes and their support persons.家庭/朋友激活促进自我护理(FAMS)2.0 随机对照试验的理由、设计和招募结果,该试验针对的是 2 型糖尿病患者及其支持人员。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Nov;122:106956. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106956. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
4
Effect of Mobile Phone Text Messaging Self-Management Support for Patients With Diabetes or Coronary Heart Disease in a Chronic Disease Management Program (SupportMe) on Blood Pressure: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.慢性病管理项目中手机短信自我管理支持对糖尿病或冠心病患者血压的影响(SupportMe):实用随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 16;25:e38275. doi: 10.2196/38275.
5
Mobile Phone Support for Diabetes Self-Care Among Diverse Adults: Protocol for a Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.针对不同成年人糖尿病自我护理的手机支持:一项三臂随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Apr 10;7(4):e92. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9443.
6
Mixed-Methods Randomized Evaluation of FAMS: A Mobile Phone-Delivered Intervention to Improve Family/Friend Involvement in Adults' Type 2 Diabetes Self-Care.FAMS 的混合方法随机评估:一项通过手机提供的干预措施,以改善家庭/朋友对成年人 2 型糖尿病自我护理的参与。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;55(2):165-178. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa041.
7
The Design, Usability, and Feasibility of a Family-Focused Diabetes Self-Care Support mHealth Intervention for Diverse, Low-Income Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.针对不同的低收入2型糖尿病成年患者的以家庭为中心的糖尿病自我护理支持移动健康干预措施的设计、可用性和可行性
J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:7586385. doi: 10.1155/2016/7586385. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
8
Phone Messaging to Prompt Physical Activity and Social Support Among Low-Income Latino Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Pilot Study.通过电话短信促进低收入拉丁裔2型糖尿病患者的身体活动和社会支持:一项随机试点研究。
JMIR Diabetes. 2017 Jun 6;2(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.7063.
9
The Goldilocks Dilemma on Balancing User Response and Reflection in mHealth Interventions: Observational Study. Goldilocks 困境:在移动健康干预中平衡用户反应和反思:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 19;12:e47632. doi: 10.2196/47632.
10
British South Asian Patients' Perspectives on the Relevance and Acceptability of Mobile Health Text Messaging to Support Medication Adherence for Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Study.英国南亚患者对移动健康短信支持 2 型糖尿病药物依从性的相关性和可接受性的看法:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 20;8(4):e15789. doi: 10.2196/15789.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in access to and use of diabetes technologies and therapeutics: a narrative review.糖尿病技术与治疗方法在获取和使用方面的差异:一项叙述性综述
Diabetologia. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s00125-025-06494-4.
2
Sequential monitoring using the Second Generation P-Value with Type I error controlled by monitoring frequency.使用第二代P值进行序贯监测,通过监测频率控制I型错误。
Am Stat. 2025;79(1):50-60. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2024.2356109. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Racial Disparities in Selected Complications and Comorbidities among People with Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病患者特定并发症和合并症中的种族差异。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 17;12(8):846. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12080846.
4
Significance of fostering the mental health of patients with diabetes through critical time intervention.通过关键时期干预促进糖尿病患者心理健康的意义。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Dec 26;11(36):8486-8497. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i36.8486.
5
Prerandomization withdrawals from a Type 2 diabetes self-care support intervention trial are associated with lack of available support person coparticipant.2型糖尿病自我护理支持干预试验中随机分组前退出与缺乏可参与的支持人员共同参与有关。
Chronic Illn. 2025 Mar;21(1):105-114. doi: 10.1177/17423953231203734. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
6
Dyadic digital health interventions: Their rationale and implementation.二元数字健康干预措施:其基本原理与实施
Procedia Comput Sci. 2022;206:183-194. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.097. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
7
Effectiveness of the Family Portal Function on the Lilly Connected Care Program (LCCP) for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching.家庭门户功能在 Lilly 互联护理计划(LCCP)对 2 型糖尿病患者中的有效性:基于倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 5;9(2):e25122. doi: 10.2196/25122.
8
Integrating family and friend support, information technology, and diabetes education in community-centric diabetes self-management.以社区为中心的糖尿病自我管理中整合家庭和朋友支持、信息技术和糖尿病教育。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Feb 15;28(2):261-275. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa223.
9
Mixed-Methods Randomized Evaluation of FAMS: A Mobile Phone-Delivered Intervention to Improve Family/Friend Involvement in Adults' Type 2 Diabetes Self-Care.FAMS 的混合方法随机评估:一项通过手机提供的干预措施,以改善家庭/朋友对成年人 2 型糖尿病自我护理的参与。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;55(2):165-178. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa041.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing helpful and harmful family and friend involvement in adults' type 2 diabetes self-management.评估家庭和朋友对成年人 2 型糖尿病自我管理的有益和有害影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jul;102(7):1380-1388. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.027. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
2
Good intentions are not enough: how informatics interventions can worsen inequality.好心未必有好报:信息学干预措施如何加剧不平等。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Aug 1;25(8):1080-1088. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy052.
3
Mobile Phone Support for Diabetes Self-Care Among Diverse Adults: Protocol for a Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.针对不同成年人糖尿病自我护理的手机支持:一项三臂随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Apr 10;7(4):e92. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9443.
4
Using Mobile Health to Improve Social Support for Low-Income Latino Patients with Diabetes: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of the Feasibility Trial of TExT-MED + FANS.利用移动医疗改善低收入拉丁裔糖尿病患者的社会支持:TExT-MED+FANS 可行性试验的混合方法分析。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Jan;20(1):39-48. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0198. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
5
Are participants concerned about privacy and security when using short message service to report product adherence in a rectal microbicide trial?参与者在使用短信报告直肠杀微生物剂试验产品依从性时是否担心隐私和安全问题?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Apr 1;25(4):393-400. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx081.
6
Should there be an app for that? The case for text messaging in mHealth interventions.有针对那个的应用程序吗?移动健康干预中短信服务的情况。
J Intern Med. 2018 Feb;283(2):212-213. doi: 10.1111/joim.12687. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
7
Dulce Digital: An mHealth SMS-Based Intervention Improves Glycemic Control in Hispanics With Type 2 Diabetes.甜蜜数字:基于移动医疗短信的干预措施改善了 2 型糖尿病西班牙裔患者的血糖控制。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Oct;40(10):1349-1355. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0230. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the short version of the Personal Diabetes Questionnaire to assess dietary behaviors and exercise in patients with type 2 diabetes.用于评估2型糖尿病患者饮食行为和运动情况的简化版个人糖尿病问卷的心理测量学评价
Eat Behav. 2017 Aug;26:182-188. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
9
Do health information technology self-management interventions improve glycemic control in medically underserved adults with diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.健康信息技术自我管理干预措施能否改善医疗服务不足的成年糖尿病患者的血糖控制?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;24(5):1024-1035. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx025.
10
Patient portals and broadband internet inequality.患者门户网站与宽带互联网不平等
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;24(5):927-932. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx020.

短信互动以促使朋友/家人参与糖尿病自我管理支持:可接受性以及解决差异的潜力。

Text messaging to engage friends/family in diabetes self-management support: acceptability and potential to address disparities.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):1099-1108. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz091.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocz091
PMID:31403688
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6748809/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Explore acceptability of engaging family/friends in patients' type 2 diabetes (T2D) self-management using text messaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants (N = 123) recruited from primary care clinics for a larger trial evaluating mobile phone support for T2D completed self-report measures and a hemoglobin A1c test and then had the option to invite an adult support person to receive text messages. We examined characteristics and reasons of participants who did/did not invite a support person, responses to the invitation, and feedback from patients and support persons.

RESULTS

Participants were 55.9 ± 10.1 years old, 55% female, 53% minority, and 54% disadvantaged (low income, less than high school degree/GED, uninsured, and/or homeless). Participants who invited a support person (48%) were slightly younger, more likely to be partnered, and reported more depressive symptoms and more emergency department visits in the year prior to study enrollment as compared to participants who did not (all p <.05). Participants' reasons for inviting a support person included needing help and seeing benefits of engaging others, while reasons for not inviting a support person included concerns about being a "burden" and support person's ability or desire to text. Support persons reported the texts increased awareness, created dialogue, and improved their own health behaviors.

DISCUSSION

Patients inviting a support person had higher need and thus may stand to benefit most. Most support persons were open to engagement via text messages.

CONCLUSION

Across race and socioeconomic status, text messaging may engage support persons to increase health-related support-particularly for patients with higher levels of need.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02409329.

摘要

目的

探索使用短信让家人/朋友参与 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者自我管理的可接受性。

材料与方法

参与者(N=123)从初级保健诊所招募参加一项评估手机支持 T2D 的更大规模试验,他们完成了自我报告措施和血红蛋白 A1c 测试,然后可以选择邀请一名成年支持人员接收短信。我们检查了邀请支持人员的参与者和不邀请支持人员的参与者的特征和原因、对邀请的反应以及患者和支持人员的反馈。

结果

参与者的年龄为 55.9±10.1 岁,55%为女性,53%为少数民族,54%为弱势群体(低收入、未完成高中学业/普通教育发展证书、没有保险和/或无家可归)。与未邀请支持人员的参与者相比,邀请支持人员的参与者(48%)年龄稍小,更有可能有伴侣,并且在研究入组前一年报告更多的抑郁症状和更多的急诊就诊(所有 p<0.05)。参与者邀请支持人员的原因包括需要帮助和看到让他人参与的好处,而不邀请支持人员的原因包括担心成为“负担”以及支持人员的能力或意愿发送短信。支持人员报告说,短信增加了意识,创造了对话,并改善了他们自己的健康行为。

讨论

邀请支持人员的患者需求更高,因此可能受益最大。大多数支持人员愿意通过短信参与。

结论

跨越种族和社会经济地位,短信可能会让支持人员参与进来,增加与健康相关的支持——特别是对需求较高的患者。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02409329。