Suppr超能文献

基于活动的安全与质量资金:针对以护理为重点的卫生服务成果研究的问题与方向的政策讨论。

Activity-based funding for safety and quality: A policy discussion of issues and directions for nursing-focused health services outcomes research.

作者信息

Heslop Liza

机构信息

Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Pract. 2019 Oct;25(5):e12775. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12775. Epub 2019 Aug 15.

Abstract

AIMS

A discussion of the implications and opportunities arising from the Commonwealth of Australia health care reform agenda; linking pricing with quality, with particular reference to directions for nursing-focused health services outcomes research directed to improve the safety and quality of health care practices.

BACKGROUND

National activity-based funding in Australia is a policy-focused development. As the relationship between cost and quality becomes apparent, the role of clinicians and their contribution to high quality care has become a pressing issue for leadership, teaching, and research.

DESIGN

Discussion paper DATA SOURCES: This paper is based on seven years' experience as a member of a Commonwealth of Australia statutory committee-the Clinical Advisory Committee of the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority-and is supported by relevant literature and theory.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

To date, unravelling the linkage, especially causal relationships, between direct care nursing and patient safety outcomes has not been well established. New activity-based funding data elements developed for national implementation in Australia provide accessible and meaningful standardised data for measurement of never events, hospital-acquired complications, and preventable readmissions.

摘要

目的

探讨澳大利亚联邦医疗保健改革议程所带来的影响和机遇;将定价与质量相联系,特别提及以护理为重点的卫生服务成果研究方向,旨在提高医疗保健实践的安全性和质量。

背景

澳大利亚基于活动的国家资金是一项以政策为重点的发展举措。随着成本与质量之间的关系日益明显,临床医生的角色及其对高质量护理的贡献已成为领导力、教学和研究方面的紧迫问题。

设计

讨论文件

数据来源

本文基于作为澳大利亚联邦法定委员会——独立医院定价局临床咨询委员会成员的七年经验,并得到相关文献和理论的支持。

对护理的启示

迄今为止,直接护理与患者安全结果之间的联系,尤其是因果关系,尚未得到充分确立。为在澳大利亚全国实施而开发的基于活动的新资金数据元素,为衡量不良事件、医院获得性并发症和可预防的再入院提供了可获取且有意义的标准化数据。

相似文献

4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Costs associated with adverse events among acute patients.急性病患者不良事件的相关费用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 13;17(1):651. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2605-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验