Feinberg Todd E, Mallatt Jon
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Psychiatry and Neurology, New York, NY, United States.
The University of Washington WWAMI Medical Education Program at The University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 31;10:1686. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01686. eCollection 2019.
While life in general can be explained by the mechanisms of physics, chemistry, and biology, to many scientists and philosophers, it appears that when it comes to explaining consciousness, there is what the philosopher Joseph Levine called an "explanatory gap" between the physical brain and subjective experiences. Here, we deduce the living and neural features behind primary consciousness within a naturalistic biological framework, identify which animal taxa have these features (the vertebrates, arthropods, and cephalopod molluscs), then reconstruct when consciousness first evolved and consider its adaptive value. We theorize that consciousness is based on all the complex system features of life, plus even more complex features of elaborate brains. We argue that the main reason why the explanatory gap between the brain and experience has been so refractory to scientific explanation is that it arises from both life and from varied and diverse brains and brain regions, so bridging the gap requires a complex, multifactorial account that includes the great of consciousness, its that stems from embodied life, and the special neural features that make consciousness in nature.
虽然一般的生命现象可以用物理、化学和生物学机制来解释,但对许多科学家和哲学家来说,在解释意识时,似乎正如哲学家约瑟夫·莱文所说,在物理大脑和主观体验之间存在一个“解释鸿沟”。在此,我们在自然主义生物学框架内推导初级意识背后的生命和神经特征,确定哪些动物类群具有这些特征(脊椎动物、节肢动物和头足类软体动物),然后重构意识最初进化的时间并考虑其适应性价值。我们提出理论,认为意识基于生命的所有复杂系统特征,再加上复杂大脑的更复杂特征。我们认为大脑与体验之间的解释鸿沟一直如此难以用科学解释的主要原因在于,它既源于生命,也源于多样的大脑和脑区,因此弥合这一鸿沟需要一个复杂的、多因素的解释,其中包括意识的广度、源于具身生命的意识深度,以及使意识在本质上具有独特性的特殊神经特征。