Suppr超能文献

如何对残疾儿童遭受暴力问题进行高质量研究:关键的伦理、测量和研究原则。

How to conduct good quality research on violence against children with disabilities: key ethical, measurement, and research principles.

机构信息

Gender Violence and Health Centre, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, 15, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.

International Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 17;19(1):1133. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7456-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately one billion children experience violence every year. Violence against children is an urgent global public health concern and violation of children's rights. It is also a risk factor for serious negative health and social outcomes and is therefore addressed within the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Children with disabilities, who make up one in 20 children worldwide, are particularly vulnerable to violence although good quality data are lacking on causes and means of prevention of violence against children with disabilities. Key challenges exist in the measurement of disability and violence, which in part explains the dearth in evidence. IMPROVING RESEARCH ON VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES: This paper provides guidance on how to conduct good quality, ethical, and inclusive research on violence against children with disabilities, particularly in low-income settings. The lack of an international agreed 'gold standard' frustrates efforts to measure violence across settings and time. Careful consideration must be given to the design of survey tools. Qualitative and participatory research methods also offer important opportunities to explore children's subjective understanding and experiences of violence. Challenges also exist around the measurement of disability. Disability may be measured by asking directly about disability, through self-reported functioning, or through the presence of impairments or health conditions. These approaches have strengths and limitations and should build on what children are able to do and include appropriate adaptations for specific impairments where necessary. Ethical research also requires adherence to ethical guidelines and approvals, obtaining informed consent, appropriate child protection responses, and careful consideration of interviewer-related issues including their selection, training, and welfare. Key methodological gaps remain - how to include children with severe communication challenges in research; how to respond in instances of weak child protection systems; designing sampling procedures that adequately represent children with disabilities in large-scale violence surveys; and determining how best to ask about violence safely in large-scale surveys and monitoring data. This paper further advocates for the dissemination of research results in inclusive and accessible formats.

CONCLUSION

With careful planning, challenges in collecting data on disability and violence can be overcome to generate evidence in this neglected area.

摘要

背景

全球约有 10 亿儿童每年遭受暴力侵害。暴力侵害儿童是一项紧迫的全球公共卫生关切和儿童权利侵犯问题。它也是严重负面健康和社会后果的一个风险因素,因此在可持续发展目标(SDGs)中得到了处理。全球范围内,每 20 名儿童中就有 1 名残疾儿童,他们尤其容易遭受暴力侵害,尽管残疾儿童遭受暴力的原因和预防手段方面缺乏高质量数据。在残疾和暴力的衡量方面存在着主要挑战,这在一定程度上解释了证据不足的原因。改善残疾儿童暴力问题的研究:本文就如何在残疾儿童暴力问题方面开展高质量、符合伦理且包容的研究提供了指导,特别是在低收入环境下。缺乏国际公认的“黄金标准”,使得在不同环境和时间下衡量暴力行为的工作变得举步维艰。必须仔细考虑调查工具的设计。定性和参与性研究方法也为探索儿童对暴力的主观理解和体验提供了重要机会。残疾的衡量也存在挑战。残疾可以通过直接询问残疾情况、通过自我报告的功能,或通过存在损伤或健康状况来衡量。这些方法各有优势和局限性,应该基于儿童的实际能力,并在必要时针对特定损伤进行适当调整。伦理研究还需要遵守伦理准则和批准、获得知情同意、适当的儿童保护应对措施,并仔细考虑与访谈者相关的问题,包括他们的选择、培训和福利。关键的方法学差距仍然存在——如何让严重沟通障碍的儿童参与研究;如何应对儿童保护系统薄弱的情况;设计充分代表大规模暴力调查中残疾儿童的抽样程序;以及确定如何在大规模调查和监测数据中安全地询问暴力问题。本文进一步主张以包容和可访问的格式传播研究结果。

结论

通过精心规划,可以克服在残疾和暴力数据收集方面的挑战,从而在这一被忽视的领域产生证据。

相似文献

5
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Ethical considerations for disability-inclusive gender-based violence research: Reflections from a South African qualitative case study.
Glob Public Health. 2019 May;14(5):737-749. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1542015. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
10
"A child who is hidden has no rights": Responses to violence against children with disabilities.
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Mar;89:58-69. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.024. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The development and testing of a module on child functioning for identifying children with disabilities on surveys. I: Background.
Disabil Health J. 2018 Oct;11(4):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
2
The development and testing of a module on child functioning for identifying children with disabilities on surveys. III: Field testing.
Disabil Health J. 2018 Oct;11(4):510-518. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
4
Reporting suspected abuse or neglect in research involving children.
J Med Ethics. 2018 Aug;44(8):555-559. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104452. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
5
Youth self-report of child maltreatment in representative surveys: a systematic review.
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2018 Feb;38(2):37-54. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.38.2.01.
6
Poverty and disability in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 21;12(12):e0189996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189996. eCollection 2017.
7
Measuring child functioning: the Unicef/ Washington Group Module.
Salud Publica Mex. 2017 Jul-Aug;59(4):485-487. doi: 10.21149/8962.
10
Collecting data on violence against children and young people: need for a universal standard.
Int Health. 2016 May;8(3):159-61. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihw009. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验