Suppr超能文献

《CAHPS 癌症护理调查的开发与测试》。

Development and Testing of the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey.

机构信息

Abt Associates, Durham, NC.

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2019 Nov;15(11):e969-e978. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00039. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Cancer Care Survey is a systematic assessment of health care experiences of patients with cancer. It supports comparisons among all cancer treatment settings and modalities.

METHODS

Formative research included 16 focus groups with patients receiving treatment and family members; advice from a panel of oncology and quality improvement experts; and interviews with stakeholders representing oncology associations, accredited cancer centers, and community oncology practices. We conducted cognitive tests of the instrument and field tests at six cancer centers and four community oncology practices, after which the survey was finalized and obtained the CAHPS trademark.

RESULTS

The survey includes 56 questions that form six core composite measures (Getting Timely Care; Supporting Patient Self-Management; Available to Provide Care and Information; Provider Communication; Care Coordination; and Courteous Office Staff); two single-item measures of family participation in care and interpreter services; and two global ratings of cancer care and the treatment team. Sixteen additional items form three supplemental composite measures: Shared Decision-Making, Keeping Patients Informed, and Access to Care.

CONCLUSION

Mail-only, mail-telephone mixed-mode, and Web-mail mixed-mode data collection methods are recommended. The questionnaires and instructions for use are free and available in English and Spanish on the CAHPS Website (www.ahrq.gov/cahps).

摘要

目的

医疗保健提供者和系统的患者评估(CAHPS)癌症护理调查是对癌症患者的医疗保健体验进行系统评估。它支持所有癌症治疗环境和方式之间的比较。

方法

形成性研究包括 16 个患者接受治疗和家属的焦点小组;来自肿瘤学和质量改进专家小组的建议;以及代表肿瘤学协会、认证癌症中心和社区肿瘤学实践的利益相关者的访谈。我们对该仪器进行了认知测试,并在六个癌症中心和四个社区肿瘤学实践中进行了现场测试,之后完成了调查并获得了 CAHPS 商标。

结果

该调查包括 56 个问题,形成了六个核心综合衡量标准(及时获得护理;支持患者自我管理;随时提供护理和信息;提供者沟通;护理协调;以及礼貌的办公室工作人员);两个关于家庭参与护理和口译服务的单项衡量标准;以及对癌症护理和治疗团队的两项总体评价。另外 16 项形成了三个补充综合衡量标准:共同决策、让患者了解情况和获得护理。

结论

建议使用仅邮寄、邮寄-电话混合模式和网络邮件混合模式进行数据收集。问卷和使用说明是免费的,可在 CAHPS 网站(www.ahrq.gov/cahps)上获得英语和西班牙语版本。

相似文献

1
Development and Testing of the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey.《CAHPS 癌症护理调查的开发与测试》。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Nov;15(11):e969-e978. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00039. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
9
Development of and field test results for the CAHPS PCMH Survey.CAHPS PCMH 调查的开发和现场测试结果。
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S2-10. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182610aba.
10
Special issues in assessing care of Medicaid recipients.评估医疗补助受助人护理情况的特殊问题。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS79-88. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00009.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
How much is lost in using single items?使用单件物品会损失多少?
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Nov;27(11):1402-3. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2182-6.
2
Triple-negative breast cancer.三阴性乳腺癌
Curr Opin Oncol. 2008 Nov;20(6):614-20. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e328312efba.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验