University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen.
University of Essex.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019 Dec;90(4):609-618. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1640840. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
: To study the pacing behavior and performance of novice youth exercisers in a controlled laboratory setting. : Ten healthy participants (seven male, three female, 15.8 ± 1.0 years) completed four, 2-km trials on a Velotron cycling ergometer. Visit 1 was a familiarization trial. Visits 2 to 4 involved the following conditions, in randomized order: no opponent (NO), a virtual opponent (starting slow and finishing fast) (OP-SLOWFAST), and a virtual opponent (starting fast and finishing slow) (OP-FASTSLOW). Repeated measurement ANOVAs ( < .05) were used to examine differences in both pacing behavior and also performance related to power output, finishing- and split times, and RPE between the four successive visits and the three conditions. Expected performance outcome was measured using a questionnaire. : Power output increased (F = 5.651, = .004, η = .386) and finishing time decreased (F = 9.972, < .001, η = .526) between visit 1 and visits 2, 3 and 4. In comparison of the first and second visit, the difference between expected finish time and actual finishing time decreased by 66.2%, regardless of condition. The only significant difference observed in RPE score was reported at the 500 m point, where RPE was higher during visit 1 compared to visits 3 and 4, and during visit 2 compared to visit 4 ( < .05). No differences in pacing behavior, performance, or RPE were found between conditions ( > .05). : Performance was improved by an increase in experience after one visit, parallel with the ability to anticipate future workload.
: 研究新手青年锻炼者在受控实验室环境中的配速行为和表现。 : 10 名健康参与者(7 名男性,3 名女性,15.8±1.0 岁)在 Velotron 自行车测功机上完成了四次 2 公里的试验。第 1 次访问是熟悉阶段。第 2 至 4 次访问涉及以下条件,按随机顺序进行:无对手(NO)、虚拟对手(开始慢,结束快)(OP-SLOWFAST)和虚拟对手(开始快,结束慢)(OP-FASTSLOW)。重复测量方差分析( <.05)用于检查四次连续访问和三种条件之间的配速行为以及与功率输出、完成时间和分段时间以及 RPE 相关的性能差异。使用问卷测量预期的表现结果。 : 功率输出在访问 1 和访问 2、3 和 4 之间增加(F=5.651, <.001,η=.526),完成时间减少(F=9.972, <.001,η=.386)。与第一次和第二次访问相比,无论条件如何,期望的完成时间和实际完成时间之间的差异减少了 66.2%。唯一观察到的 RPE 得分的显著差异是在 500 米点报告的,与访问 3 和 4 相比,访问 1 的 RPE 更高,与访问 4 相比,访问 2 的 RPE 更高( <.05)。在配速行为、性能或 RPE 方面,条件之间没有差异( >.05)。 : 一次访问后经验的增加提高了表现,同时也提高了预测未来工作量的能力。